NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data in the database contains a single benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER and no benchmark entries for the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. This asymmetry makes a direct score-to-score comparison impossible. The RTX 5070 SUPER achieved a score of 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, a result that places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database, based on average scores, are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662, the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645. The RTX 5070 SUPER leads the Quadro K1100M by 1 percent, the GT 1030 by 1.1 percent, the Arc Pro B50 by 1.1 percent, and the GT 440 by 1.7 percent. These deltas are narrow, indicating that the RTX 5070 SUPER’s measured score sits within a tight cluster of much older and lower-tier products in the database’s ranking.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its percentile placement is 50, though this figure is derived from the absence of data rather than from any measured performance. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison cannot be resolved through benchmark output. The data simply shows one product with a single measurable result and another product with no results at all. Any statement about relative performance must rely on the architectural and specification differences presented in the database, not on direct numerical benchmarks.

What the data does show is that the RTX 5070 SUPER’s single score, while modest in the absolute context of the database, is internally consistent across its nearest rivals. The spread from the top rival to the bottom rival is only 19 points, which suggests that the benchmark environment for this particular test produces tightly grouped results for GPUs in this performance tier. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, with no score, cannot be placed into that grouping or any other.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply at the architectural level. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip built on Ada Lovelace. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, so the process node is identical. The transistor counts differ considerably: the RTX 5070 SUPER integrates 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 integrates 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, yielding a density of 121.1 million per mm². The embedded part therefore has a larger die, more transistors, and a slightly higher transistor density.

Clock speeds also separate the two. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 runs at a 930 MHz base and a 1680 MHz boost. The desktop card is substantially faster on paper in clock terms, with a boost clock that is roughly 49 percent higher than the embedded part’s boost figure. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 5070 SUPER operates at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The effective data rate favors the RTX 5070 SUPER, but the raw memory clock is higher on the embedded part.

The compute resources move in the opposite direction. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 50 ray tracing cores, and 200 tensor cores. In every one of these counts, the embedded Ada part has more hardware. The FP32 throughput is nearly identical: the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS, and the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS, a difference of about 1.7 percent in favor of the embedded part. FP16 throughput is listed at the same values for both, at a 1:1 ratio with FP32.

The memory subsystems also differ. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, producing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, producing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The desktop card offers more capacity and higher bandwidth, but the embedded part uses a wider bus with an older memory type. The RTX 5070 SUPER also has a higher pixel rate at 201.0 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s, while the texture rate is slightly higher on the embedded part at 510.7 GTexel/s versus 502.4 GTexel/s.

Where Each One Wins

The data supports distinct use-case advantages for each product, though the absence of benchmarks for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 means these conclusions rest on specifications rather than measured scores. The RTX 5070 SUPER wins on memory capacity, bandwidth, and clock speed. Its 18 GB frame buffer exceeds the 16 GB of the embedded part, and its 672.0 GB/s bandwidth is 96 GB/s higher. The boost clock of 2512 MHz is far above the embedded part’s 1680 MHz, which typically translates into higher frame rates in latency-sensitive workloads where single-threaded draw calls and fixed-function throughput dominate. The RTX 5070 SUPER also carries a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which doubles the per-lane bandwidth of the embedded part’s PCIe 4.0 x16 connection.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 counters with raw compute resource counts. It has 52 percent more shading units, 52 percent more texture mapping units, 40 percent more ROPs, 52 percent more ray tracing cores, and 52 percent more tensor cores than the RTX 5070 SUPER. Its FP32 output of 32.69 TFLOPS edges out the RTX 5070 SUPER’s 32.15 TFLOPS. For workloads that scale with shader count, ray tracing core count, or tensor core count, the embedded part holds a structural advantage despite its lower clocks. The larger die and higher transistor count also suggest more headroom for compute-heavy tasks, though the database does not provide a measured score to confirm this.

The power envelope separates the two in practical deployment terms. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a TDP of 150 W and uses no external power connector, with a slot width of IGP. The embedded part is designed for portable or integrated environments where power draw and physical footprint are constrained. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot card with specific dimensions of 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, whereas the embedded part lists no dimensions and relies on the host device for display outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has a boost clock of 2512 MHz, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a boost clock of 1680 MHz.

Q: What are the memory capacities and types?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 9728 shading units, compared to 6400 on the RTX 5070 SUPER.

Q: Is there a benchmark score for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, and its average benchmark score is zero. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a single recorded score of 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a TDP of 150 W and uses no external power connector.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 45,900 million transistors, compared to 31,100 million on the RTX 5070 SUPER.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification field in the database.

• Chip: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip.
• Architecture: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses Ada Lovelace.
• Transistors: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 31,100 million transistors; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 45,900 million.
• Die Size: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a 263 mm² die; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a 379 mm² die.
• Transistor Density: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 118.3 million transistors per mm²; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 121.1 million per mm².
• Base Clock: The RTX 5070 SUPER runs at 2325 MHz; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 runs at 930 MHz.
• Boost Clock: The RTX 5070 SUPER runs at 2512 MHz; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 runs at 1680 MHz.
• Memory Clock: The RTX 5070 SUPER operates at 1750 MHz with a 28 Gbps effective rate; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 operates at 2250 MHz with an 18 Gbps effective rate.
• Memory Size: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB.
• Memory Type: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses GDDR7; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses GDDR6.
• Memory Bus Width: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses a 192-bit bus; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses a 256-bit bus.
• Memory Bandwidth: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 672.0 GB/s; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 576.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 9728.
• Texture Mapping Units: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 200; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 304.
• ROPs: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 80; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 112.
• Ray Tracing Cores: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 50; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 76.
• Tensor Cores: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 200; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 304.
• Pixel Rate: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 201.0 GPixel/s; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 188.2 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 502.4 GTexel/s; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 510.7 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Throughput: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS.
• FP16 Throughput: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS.
• TDP: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a TDP of 150 W.
• Slot Width: The RTX 5070 SUPER is dual-slot; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is IGP.
• Power Connectors: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 1x 16-pin; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses none.
• Bus Interface: The RTX 5070 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.
• Display Outputs: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is portable device dependent.
• Release Date: The RTX 5070 SUPER is dated 2025-12-31; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is dated 2023-03-20.
• Predecessor: The RTX 5070 SUPER lists none; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 lists Ampere-MW.
• Successor: The RTX 5070 SUPER lists none; the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 lists Blackwell-MW.