NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

The Verdict

The database places the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its nearest rivals, NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% behind), and Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% behind), all sit within a narrow 1.7% window of the RTX 5070 SUPER's score. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average at zero and its percentile at 50, which is a positional artifact rather than a performance result.

For the RTX 5070 SUPER, the data shows a desktop-oriented card with an active production status, a dual-slot cooler, a 16-pin power connector, and a 275 W power draw. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, a 50 W power draw, and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The verdict is straightforward: the RTX 5070 SUPER is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark data, so any performance conclusion must rest on its recorded score and rival comparisons. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation's role is defined by its embedded, low-power design, not by competitive gaming or workstation benchmarks in this database.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share a 5 nm TSMC fabrication process but otherwise diverge sharply in chip design. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture. Transistor counts differ substantially: the GB205 packs 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, while the AD107 has 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. Transistor density is nearly identical, at 118.3 million per mm² for the GB205 and 118.9 million per mm² for the AD107.

The RTX 5070 SUPER carries 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It also has 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER's shading unit count is more than double that of the embedded part, and its tensor core count is likewise more than double.

Memory configurations are dramatically different. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, for 256.0 GB/s. Clock speeds also favor the RTX 5070 SUPER: its base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost of 2512 MHz, versus 1530 MHz base and 2010 MHz boost for the embedded card. Memory clocks are 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5070 SUPER and 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation.

The bus interface differs as well: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 SUPER, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the embedded card. Display outputs for the RTX 5070 SUPER include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation's outputs are portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation's predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has no listed predecessor or successor. The embedded card's generation field lists "Ada-MW" with a line break, indicating a mobile workstation lineage.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins on every measurable performance metric in the database. Its pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s versus 96.48 GPixel/s for the embedded card. Texture rate stands at 502.4 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 32.15 TFLOPS versus 12.35 TFLOPS, and FP16 is likewise 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 12.35 TFLOPS (1:1). The RTX 5070 SUPER's memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s is 2.6 times the embedded card's 256.0 GB/s. Its 18 GB frame buffer is more than double the 8 GB of the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation wins on power efficiency and physical integration. Its 50 W power draw is one-sixth of the RTX 5070 SUPER's 275 W. It uses no power connectors and occupies an IGP slot width, whereas the RTX 5070 SUPER is dual-slot and requires a 16-pin connector. The embedded card's release date of March 2023 predates the RTX 5070 SUPER's December 2025 release, which may indicate a longer field history. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is also the only one with a listed predecessor (Ampere-MW) and successor (Blackwell-MW), indicating an established product line.

In terms of raw benchmark presence, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the clear winner with a 2690 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark entries, so the database shows no wins for it in head-to-head tests. The wins tally stands at zero for both cards in the head-to-head section, because no shared test exists.

FAQ

Q: What is the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark score?

A: The database records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with an average score of 2664, which is 1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 scores 2662 (1.1% behind), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 2660 (1.1% behind). The NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 scores 2645, 1.7% behind.

Q: Does the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, so its average benchmark score is zero.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a 275 W power draw, is dual-slot, and uses one 16-pin power connector. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has a 50 W power draw, is an IGP, and uses no power connectors.

Q: Which card has more compute resources?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, meaning no direct comparative test between the RTX 5070 SUPER and the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has been recorded. The only standalone score belongs to the RTX 5070 SUPER: 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with a narrow competitive band among its nearest rivals. The Quadro K1100M trails by 1%, the GT 1030 by 1.1%, the Arc Pro B50 by 1.1%, and the GT 440 by 1.7%.

For the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, the absence of benchmark data means no percentile ranking can be derived from actual performance. Its 50th percentile listing is a database default tied to its zero average score, not a measured result. The only comparative analysis possible is architectural: the RTX 5070 SUPER's FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS is 2.6 times the embedded card's 12.35 TFLOPS, and its texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s is 2.6 times the 193.0 GTexel/s of the embedded part. Pixel rate follows a similar pattern, with 201.0 GPixel/s versus 96.48 GPixel/s, a 2.1 times advantage.

Memory bandwidth tells the same story. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 672.0 GB/s is 2.6 times the 256.0 GB/s of the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. The 18 GB frame buffer versus 8 GB doubles the capacity for large datasets or textures. The RTX 5070 SUPER also leads in clock speeds, with a 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost against the embedded card's 1530 MHz base and 2010 MHz boost. The boost clock gap of 502 MHz is significant for sustained workloads.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation's advantages are purely physical and electrical. Its 50 W power draw allows fanless or passively cooled embedded designs, and its IGP form factor with no power connectors suits portable devices. The RTX 5070 SUPER, at 275 W with a dual-slot cooler and a 16-pin connector, is a desktop add-in card with dimensions of 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width. The embedded card has no listed dimensions, consistent with its integration into host systems.

Process node and transistor density are nearly identical, at 5 nm and roughly 118 million transistors per mm² for both. The RTX 5070 SUPER's larger die (263 mm² versus 159 mm²) and higher transistor count (31,100 million versus 18,900 million) account for its resource advantages. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation's smaller chip is sufficient for its lower power envelope and embedded role.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's release date of December 2025 is later than the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation's March 2023 release. Both are listed as active in production. The embedded card's predecessor and successor, Ampere-MW and Blackwell-MW respectively, show a generational roadmap that the RTX 5070 SUPER lacks in the database. The RTX 5070 SUPER's Blackwell 2.0 architecture is newer than the embedded card's Ada Lovelace, but both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The data does not support a direct performance comparison because the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmarks. What the data does support is a clear resource hierarchy: the RTX 5070 SUPER leads in every compute, memory, and bandwidth metric, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation leads in power efficiency and integration flexibility. Any workload that fits within 8 GB of GDDR6 and 50 W of power can run on the embedded card, but the RTX 5070 SUPER offers more than double the shading units, tensor cores, and memory bandwidth for tasks that demand maximum throughput.