NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs NVIDIA Jetson T4000 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RTX 5070 SUPER is the only part in this comparison with a recorded benchmark score in the database. It posts 2,690 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The Jetson T4000 has no recorded benchmark results, so direct performance comparison is limited to architectural traits rather than measured output.

The RTX 5070 SUPER’s nearest rivals in the database are all substantially lower-tier products. It leads the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M by 1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 by 1.1%, the Intel Arc Pro B50 by 1.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 by 1.7%. These deltas are small, indicating the 5070 SUPER sits at the lower edge of the current GPU performance spectrum. The T4000 has no nearest rivals listed, and its average benchmark score is 0, reflecting the absence of testing data.

The FP32 compute figures show a large gap between the two. The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS, while the Jetson T4000 delivers 4.700 TFLOPS. That is roughly 6.8 times higher raw shading throughput for the 5070 SUPER. The FP16 numbers are identical to FP32 on both parts, with the 5070 SUPER at 32.15 TFLOPS and the T4000 at 4.700 TFLOPS, indicating 1:1 ratio implementations on both.

Pixel throughput also favors the 5070 SUPER heavily. It reaches 201.0 GPixel/s versus 24.48 GPixel/s on the T4000, an 8.2x advantage. Texture rate tells a similar story: 502.4 GTexel/s on the 5070 SUPER versus 73.44 GTexel/s on the T4000, a 6.8x difference. These ratios are consistent with the shading unit disparity, as the 5070 SUPER carries 6,400 shading units against 1,536 on the T4000.

Memory bandwidth reverses the expected order. The Jetson T4000 uses a 256-bit LPDDR5X bus running at 8.5 Gbps effective, yielding 273.2 GB/s. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses a narrower 192-bit GDDR7 bus at 28 Gbps effective, yielding 672.0 GB/s. The 5070 SUPER’s bandwidth is 2.5x higher, but the T4000’s larger bus width and lower clock speed highlight different design priorities. The T4000 also has far more memory capacity, 64 GB versus 18 GB.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Jetson T4000 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It leads the Quadro K1100M by 1%, the GeForce GT 1030 by 1.1%, the Arc Pro B50 by 1.1%, and the GeForce GT 440 by 1.7%.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6,400 shading units, while the Jetson T4000 has 1,536.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The Jetson T4000 has a TDP of 90 W, uses no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU rating of 250 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: No. The RTX 5070 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Jetson T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share the Blackwell architecture family but diverge significantly in implementation. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The Jetson T4000 uses the GB10B chip, also on 5 nm TSMC, but with a larger 391 mm² die. Transistor count for the T4000 is listed as unknown, and transistor density data is absent for that part.

Core configuration differs sharply. The RTX 5070 SUPER packs 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. The Jetson T4000 has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs: the 5070 SUPER includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, while the T4000 has 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores.

Clock behavior is another differentiator. The RTX 5070 SUPER runs at a base of 2325 MHz and boosts to 2512 MHz. The Jetson T4000 runs at a fixed 1530 MHz for both base and boost, indicating a locked or conservative clock profile suited to embedded or server workloads. Memory clocks differ as well: the 5070 SUPER uses 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the T4000 uses 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective.

The T4000’s predecessor is listed as Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin, placing it in the server product line. The RTX 5070 SUPER has no predecessor or successor listed. The T4000 is integrated into a system (IGP form factor), while the 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot discrete card. The T4000 has no display outputs, whereas the 5070 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to two entirely different product categories. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a graphics-first part with measurable 3D performance, a 2,690 Steel Nomad score, and a full suite of display outputs. The Jetson T4000 is a compute-oriented server module with no benchmark data, no display outputs, and no graphics API support in the database.

For tasks requiring rasterization, ray tracing, or high FP32 throughput, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the only viable option. Its 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 output, 50 RT cores, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support give it a clear functional advantage in graphics workloads. The 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth also supports high-resolution textures and frame buffers.

The Jetson T4000 offers 64 GB of LPDDR5X memory, which is 3.6x the capacity of the 5070 SUPER. That capacity, combined with a 256-bit bus and 90 W power envelope, suggests a role in memory-heavy inference or embedded compute tasks. The absence of graphics APIs and display outputs reinforces that this is not a consumer graphics card.

Power and physical design separate them further. The 5070 SUPER draws 275 W and requires a 16-pin connector, while the T4000 draws 90 W, uses no external power, and fits a 250 W PSU recommendation. The T4000’s IGP form factor and 87 mm length fit compact embedded systems, whereas the 5070 SUPER’s 245 mm dual-slot card requires a standard desktop slot.

The database shows the RTX 5070 SUPER at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, indicating modest absolute performance despite its architectural advantages. The T4000 sits at the 50th percentile with no scores, so percentile placement carries no performance meaning for that part. Users needing measured graphics performance should look to the 5070 SUPER; users needing high memory capacity in a low-power embedded form factor should look to the T4000.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER | NVIDIA Jetson T4000 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB205 | GB10B |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell |

| Generation | GeForce 50 | Server Blackwell (Bxx) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | 391 mm² |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | unknown |

| Base Clock | 2325 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Memory Size | 18 GB | 64 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 6400 | 1536 |

| TMUs | 200 | 48 |

| ROPs | 80 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 50 | 12 |

| Tensor Cores | 200 | 64 |

| Pixel Rate | 201.0 GPixel/s | 24.48 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 502.4 GTexel/s | 73.44 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 32.15 TFLOPS | 4.700 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.700 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 275 W | 90 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | N/A | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Length | 245 mm | 87 mm |

| Height | 115 mm | 100 mm |

| Width | 40 mm | 15 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-01-04 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Predecessor | N/A | Server Hopper |

| Successor | N/A | Server Rubin |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | 1,999 USD |