NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB and the Quadro K2100M occupy entirely different eras of GPU design. The RTX 5060 Ti is an active, current-generation consumer card built on a 5 nm process, while the Quadro K2100M is an end-of-life mobile workstation part from 2013 built on 28 nm. The recorded data shows an average benchmark score of 4970 for the RTX 5060 Ti versus 4151 for the Quadro K2100M, a difference of roughly 19.7% in favor of the newer card. However, the benchmark sets do not overlap, so direct comparisons rely on interpreting each card's position within its own nearest rival group and its architectural capabilities.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB wins in every modern workload category that the database records. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019 reflects strong performance in contemporary DirectX 12 gaming and rendering tasks. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 22618, a GPU compute score of 11224, and DirectX 11 and DirectX 9 scores of 219 and 238 respectively. These numbers indicate a card designed for current-generation gaming, ray tracing, and compute-heavy applications. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large textures and datasets, and the 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

The Quadro K2100M, by contrast, wins in legacy or lightweight scenarios simply because it exists in a different performance class. Its recorded benchmarks are all Geekbench tests: Metal at 3524, OpenCL at 4587, and Vulkan at 4343. These scores place it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it sits below the majority of modern parts. Its strengths lie in low power consumption at 55 W TDP and a compact MXM module form factor, making it suitable for older mobile workstations where power and space are constrained. The data shows no head-to-head benchmark wins for either card, as the test suites do not overlap, but the architectural and performance gaps make the use-case split clear: the RTX 5060 Ti handles demanding modern workloads, while the Quadro K2100M is limited to basic display and light compute tasks from its era.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5060 Ti uses the GB206 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The Quadro K2100M uses the GK106S chip on the Kepler architecture, also from TSMC but on a 28 nm process, with 2,540 million transistors on a 221 mm² die, giving a density of 11.5M per mm². The density gap is roughly 10.5 times, which explains the massive difference in capability despite the newer card's smaller die.

The RTX 5060 Ti features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, along with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), producing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Quadro K2100M has 576 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no RT or tensor cores. Its 2 GB of GDDR5 memory runs at 752 MHz (3 Gbps effective) on a 128-bit bus, delivering only 48.13 GB/s. The pixel rate difference is stark: 123.5 GPixel/s for the RTX 5060 Ti versus 8.004 GPixel/s for the Quadro K2100M. Texture rates are 370.4 GTexel/s versus 32.02 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 23.70 TFLOPS versus 768.4 GFLOPS, a roughly 30-fold advantage for the newer card.

The RTX 5060 Ti also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and has a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The Quadro K2100M supports DirectX 12 (11_0), Vulkan 1.2.175, and runs at a fixed 667 MHz. The RTX 5060 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Quadro K2100M uses an MXM-A (3.0) interface. Display outputs differ completely: the RTX 5060 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Quadro K2100M is labeled "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its laptop-oriented design.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no overlapping benchmark entries for these two cards, so a direct score-to-score comparison is not possible from the recorded data. Instead, each card must be evaluated against its own nearest rivals to understand relative positioning.

The RTX 5060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 4970, placing it at the 29th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the NVIDIA Quadro 4000 scores 4979 with a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics scores 4998 with a delta of -0.6%, the AMD Radeon R7 M360 scores 4931 with a delta of 0.8%, and the AMD Radeon R7 M265 scores 4929 with a delta of 0.8%. This means the RTX 5060 Ti's average score is essentially even with these older or lower-tier parts, within a range of roughly 1.4% either way. Interestingly, its PassMark G3D score of 22618 is far higher than its average benchmark score would suggest, indicating that the average is dragged down by the other PassMark tests: DirectX 10 at 144, DirectX 11 at 219, DirectX 12 at 89, and DirectX 9 at 238. These low API-specific scores likely reflect driver overhead or test methodology rather than raw capability, given the G3D and compute scores are substantially higher.

The Quadro K2100M has an average benchmark score of 4151, placing it at the 25th percentile. Its nearest rivals are also tightly grouped: the AMD Radeon R5 M330 scores 4170 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 4193 with a delta of -1%, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB scores 4093 with a delta of 1.4%, and the Intel HD Graphics 630 scores 4075 with a delta of 1.9%. The Quadro K2100M sits within 2% of these parts, meaning its performance is comparable to an entry-level discrete GPU from later years or an integrated graphics solution. Its Geekbench Metal score of 3524, OpenCL score of 4587, and Vulkan score of 4343 show that it can handle compute workloads at a low level, but the absolute numbers are far below what the RTX 5060 Ti achieves in its own tests.

The largest recorded win for the RTX 5060 Ti comes from the PassMark G3D test, where its 22618 score dwarfs any single benchmark result from the Quadro K2100M. Even the Quadro K2100M's best recorded score, 4587 in Geekbench OpenCL, is less than half of the RTX 5060 Ti's GPU compute score of 11224. The data indicates that the RTX 5060 Ti is roughly 4.9 times faster in compute performance based on these two metrics, and the pixel rate and texture rate differences suggest even larger gaps in fill-rate-bound tasks.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for different user profiles. The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is the only option for anyone running modern DirectX 12 games, ray-traced workloads, or compute-heavy applications. Its 23.70 TFLOPS of FP32 power, 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and dedicated RT and tensor cores make it suitable for current-generation gaming and professional rendering tasks. The 29th percentile ranking among all GPUs, despite the low API-specific PassMark scores, suggests it is a mid-tier card that outperforms the vast majority of integrated and older discrete solutions.

The Quadro K2100M, with its 25th percentile ranking and scores comparable to the Intel HD Graphics 630, is strictly a legacy part. It is appropriate for older mobile workstations where the MXM form factor and 55 W TDP are requirements, and where the workload is limited to basic 2D display, light 3D acceleration, or OpenCL compute that does not demand modern features. Its 2 GB memory capacity and 48.13 GB/s bandwidth restrict it to small textures and simple scenes.

Users with current software should select the RTX 5060 Ti without hesitation. Users maintaining vintage systems that require the Quadro K2100M's specific MXM-A interface and power envelope have no other choice from this pairing, but the recorded data shows its performance is firmly in the entry-level class. The RTX 5060 Ti is roughly 30 times faster in FP32 compute and 15.4 times faster in pixel rate, making it the superior card in every measurable way except power draw and physical footprint.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB has an average benchmark score of 4970, while the Quadro K2100M has 4151, a difference of approximately 19.7% in favor of the RTX 5060 Ti.

Q: Do the two cards support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The RTX 5060 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Quadro K2100M supports DirectX 12 (11_0), a lower feature level.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, whereas the Quadro K2100M provides 48.13 GB/s from 2 GB of GDDR5 memory.

Q: How do their transistor densities compare?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti has a transistor density of 121.0M per mm² on a 5 nm process, while the Quadro K2100M has 11.5M per mm² on a 28 nm process.

Q: Which card has dedicated ray tracing hardware?

A: Only the RTX 5060 Ti, which features 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The Quadro K2100M has no RT or tensor cores listed.

Q: Are these cards in the same performance percentile?

A: No. The RTX 5060 Ti is at the 29th percentile of all GPUs, while the Quadro K2100M is at the 25th percentile, a small but measurable gap.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Kepler |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 21,900 million | 2,540 million |

| Die Size | 181 mm² | 221 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 121.0M / mm² | 11.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2407 MHz | 667 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 667 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective | 752 MHz, 3 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 48.13 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4608 | 576 |

| TMUs | 144 | 48 |

| ROPs | 48 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 36 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 144 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 8.004 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 370.4 GTexel/s | 32.02 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 23.70 TFLOPS | 768.4 GFLOPS |

| TDP | 180 W | 55 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | MXM Module |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.2.175 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-04-15 | 2013-07-22 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 40 | Quadro Fermi-M |

| Successor | GeForce 60 | Quadro Maxwell-M |

| Launch MSRP | 429 USD | None |