NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX A2000: The data shows a decisive generational gap, with the RTX 4080 SUPER winning all three head-to-head benchmarks by margins ranging from 223.6% to 390.7%. While the RTX A2000 holds a respectable 85th percentile ranking among all GPUs, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 86th percentile with a far higher average score (54209 vs 46043) reflects its position as a top-tier enthusiast card, whereas the A2000 is a low-profile professional option.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result comes from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, a demanding modern gaming benchmark. Here, the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 6600 points, absolutely dwarfing the RTX A2000’s 1345 points. This is a 390.7% advantage—a nearly five-fold performance gap. This delta is far larger than the average score difference between the two cards (54209 vs 46043, a 17.7% gap), illustrating that the gap widens dramatically under sustained, high-end graphical load. The A2000’s 1345 point result places it in a completely different performance tier, closer to entry-level discrete GPUs than to the 4080 SUPER.

In compute-oriented workloads, the story remains one-sided but with different margins. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4080 SUPER produces a score of 219065 against the A2000’s 67695, a 223.6% lead. This test stresses raw parallel throughput, where the 4080 SUPER’s sheer scale of execution units dominates. Similarly, Geekbench Vulkan shows the 4080 SUPER scoring 260075 versus the A2000’s 69089, a 276.4% advantage. Notably, the 4080 SUPER’s Vulkan score (260075) is 18.7% higher than its own OpenCL score (219065), while the A2000’s Vulkan score (69089) is just 2.1% higher than its OpenCL result (67695). This suggests the Ada Lovelace architecture extracts more relative performance from the Vulkan API.

When contextualizing the 4080 SUPER’s performance, the data shows it sits 0.1% behind the standard RTX 4080 (avg score 54247) and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828). It also leads the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.7% and the AMD Radeon 8060S by 2.8%. For the RTX A2000, its closest rival is the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972), which it trails by just 0.2%. It also edges out the Intel Arc A730M by 1% and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M by 1.2%, showing that in its own compact-class segment, the A2000 is highly competitive, even if it is 390.7% behind the 4080 SUPER in the most demanding test.

Where Each One Wins

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER wins unequivocally across every benchmark category tested. Its strengths lie in high-resolution gaming, real-time ray tracing, and any compute task that can leverage its massive 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad result (6600) indicates it is built for future-proof, high-fidelity gaming at maximum settings. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth and a 256-bit bus gives it substantial headroom for large textures and heavy data sets. This is a card for enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates and visual fidelity in the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate titles.

The RTX A2000, despite losing all head-to-head matchups, has a clear purpose. Its 85th percentile ranking and average score of 46043 indicate it is a solid performer in its class. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a 192-bit bus, it is far more constrained than the 4080 SUPER. However, its 70 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it uniquely suited for compact workstations or multi-GPU server configurations where power and space are at a premium. Its dual-slot, 167 mm profile is designed for density. The A2000’s wins are in efficiency and physical footprint—it delivers usable professional graphics performance in a form factor the 4080 SUPER cannot match (the 4080 SUPER is triple-slot, 310 mm long, and requires a 700 W PSU). For a multi-GPU rendering farm or a quiet, low-power office workstation, the A2000 is the practical choice, even though it is 390.7% slower in raw 3DMark performance.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 17.7% higher than the RTX A2000’s 46043.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 6600, while the RTX A2000 scores 1345. This gives the RTX 4080 SUPER a 390.7% advantage.

Q: Are both cards suited for the same types of systems?

A: No. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot, 310 mm long card with a 320 W TDP and requires a 16-pin power connector and a 700 W suggested PSU. The RTX A2000 is a dual-slot, 167 mm card with a 70 W TDP, no power connectors, and a 250 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, whereas the RTX A2000 has 288.0 GB/s from 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each card?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and the RTX A2000 is in the 85th percentile. Despite the similar percentile, the 4080 SUPER’s average score is 17.7% higher.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 10240 shading units, compared to the RTX A2000's 3328. This is a 3.1x difference.

Specification Differences

The two cards diverge drastically in almost every measurable specification. The RTX 4080 SUPER uses the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, while the RTX A2000 uses the GA106 chip with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The 4080 SUPER features 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs; the A2000 is limited to 3328 shading units, 104 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs, with the 4080 SUPER carrying 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores versus the A2000’s 26 RT cores and 104 tensor cores.

Memory configuration is similarly disparate. The 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, while the A2000 has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds show a significant difference: the 4080 SUPER boosts to 2550 MHz, while the A2000 boosts to just 1200 MHz. This contributes to a massive compute gap—52.22 TFLOPS FP32 for the 4080 SUPER versus 7.987 TFLOPS for the A2000. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: 285.6 GPixel/s and 816.0 GTexel/s for the 4080 SUPER, versus 57.60 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s for the A2000. Power and physical dimensions are also very different, with the 4080 SUPER rated at 320 W TDP, triple-slot, and 310 mm long, while the A2000 is 70 W, dual-slot, and 167 mm long. The 4080 SUPER has one 16-pin connector and requires a 700 W PSU; the A2000 has none and needs only 250 W.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is generational. The RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX A2000 is based on the older Ampere architecture on an 8 nm process at Samsung. This node difference is critical: the 4080 SUPER packs 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1M transistors per mm². The A2000’s GA106 chip has just 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die, for a density of 43.5M per mm². That means the 4080 SUPER has a 3.8x higher transistor count and a 2.8x higher transistor density, enabling its massive performance lead.

The 4080 SUPER is a GeForce 40-series part with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, whereas the A2000 belongs to the Workstation Ampere generation (Ax000), succeeding Quadro Turing. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the 4080 SUPER’s Ada Lovelace architecture brings architectural improvements—like more efficient ray tracing cores and higher clock speeds—that the Ampere-based A2000 cannot match. The 4080 SUPER’s FP16 and FP32 throughput are identical at 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), a trait shared with the A2000’s 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1), but the absolute numbers are over six times higher on the 4080 SUPER. The A2000’s low base clock of 562 MHz (versus 2295 MHz on the 4080 SUPER) is a deliberate design choice to keep power at 70 W, but it severely limits peak throughput. Additionally, the display outputs differ—the 4080 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the A2000 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, reflecting its workstation-centric design for multi-display setups.