NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA H20 Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
H20
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA H20
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and the NVIDIA H20. The RTX 4070 has a complete set of ten benchmark scores across DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. The H20 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average benchmark score at zero. The RTX 4070 holds an 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the H20 sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile difference reflects the fact that the RTX 4070 has measurable performance data while the H20 has none recorded.
The RTX 4070's strongest recorded result is its Geekbench Vulkan score of 174,152, followed by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 154,858. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,854. In Passmark tests, the DirectX 11 score of 244 leads its DirectX 10 score of 139 and DirectX 12 score of 103. The DirectX 9 score is 320, which is the highest among the Passmark DirectX tests. The GPU compute score is 14,720, and the G3D score is 26,927. The G2D score is 1,164. The average benchmark score across all ten tests is 37,648.
Nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 in the database include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with an average score of 37,628, a 0.1 percent difference. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 averages 37,507, a 0.4 percent gap. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile averages 38,135, putting it 1.3 percent ahead of the RTX 4070. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 averages 37,157, which is 1.3 percent behind. These tight margins place the RTX 4070 in a cluster of similarly performing products, with no single rival more than 1.3 percent away in either direction.
Because the H20 has no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals listed, the head-to-head comparison is limited to architectural and specification differences. The data cannot support any direct performance claim between these two cards beyond what the RTX 4070's own scores demonstrate.
The Verdict
The recorded data shows two products with fundamentally different purposes. The RTX 4070 is a consumer graphics card with a complete benchmark profile, a launch MSRP of 599 USD, and an end-of-life production status. It targets DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs, and it includes display outputs. The H20 is an active server accelerator with no display outputs, no consumer API support, and no recorded benchmarks. Its launch MSRP is absent from the database.
For anyone selecting based on measured performance, the RTX 4070 is the only option with data. Its 81st percentile ranking and average score of 37,648 provide a concrete reference point. The H20's 50th percentile ranking with zero average score indicates that no comparable measurements exist in the database. The H20's specifications, however, show a much larger memory capacity of 96 GB of HBM3 compared to the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X. The H20 also has a wider 6144-bit memory bus and 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth, versus the RTX 4070's 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s.
The verdict from the data is clear: the RTX 4070 suits client-side rendering and consumer workloads where DirectX and Vulkan support matter. The H20 suits server-side compute where memory capacity and bandwidth dominate, despite having no benchmark scores to validate that role. The choice depends on whether the workload requires graphics APIs and display output or massive memory throughput.
Where Each One Wins
The RTX 4070 wins in every measured category because it has all ten benchmark scores. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,854 and Passmark G3D score of 26,927 indicate strong graphics rendering capability. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 174,152 and OpenCL score of 154,858 show solid compute throughput for a consumer card. The Passmark GPU compute score of 14,720 adds further evidence of general-purpose processing ability. The RTX 4070 also wins on API compatibility, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which the H20 lacks entirely.
The H20 wins on raw memory resources. Its 96 GB of HBM3 memory is eight times the RTX 4070's 12 GB. Its 4.03 TB/s bandwidth is roughly eight times the RTX 4070's 504.2 GB/s. The H20 has 9,984 shading units versus 5,888, and 312 tensor cores versus 184. Its FP32 throughput of 39.54 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 79.07 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio doubles the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The H20 also has 312 texture mapping units versus 184, and a higher texture rate of 617.8 GTexel/s versus 455.4 GTexel/s.
The RTX 4070 wins on pixel rate with 158.4 GPixel/s versus the H20's 47.52 GPixel/s, a consequence of the H20 having only 24 ROPs compared to 64. The RTX 4070 also has higher clock speeds, with a boost of 2475 MHz versus 1980 MHz. The H20 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving the H20 a newer bus standard.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648 across ten tests. The H20 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmark scores are recorded for it.
Q: How much memory does each GPU have?
A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus. The H20 has 96 GB of HBM3 memory on a 6144-bit bus.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?
A: The H20 delivers 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth, while the RTX 4070 delivers 504.2 GB/s. The H20's bandwidth is approximately eight times higher.
Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX?
A: No. The RTX 4070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The H20 has no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support, with APIs listed as N/A.
Q: What are the shading unit counts?
A: The H20 has 9,984 shading units, while the RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units. The H20 also has 312 tensor cores versus the RTX 4070's 184.
Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?
A: The RTX 4070 boosts to 2475 MHz, while the H20 boosts to 1980 MHz.
Architecture Differences
The RTX 4070 uses the AD104 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The H20 uses the GH100 chip built on the Hopper architecture. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the chips differ substantially in scale. The AD104 has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GH100 has 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die, with a density of 98.3 million per mm². The H20's chip is more than twice the transistor count and nearly three times the die area.
The RTX 4070 is part of the GeForce 40 series and uses the Ada Lovelace microarchitecture with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The H20 belongs to the Server Hopper generation and has no RT cores listed, but it has 312 tensor cores. The H20's FP16 throughput is 79.07 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating specialized tensor performance for server workloads. The RTX 4070's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 29.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating balanced compute for graphics.
Memory architecture diverges sharply. The RTX 4070 uses GDDR6X memory with a 192-bit interface and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The H20 uses HBM3 with a 6144-bit interface and 4.03 TB/s bandwidth. The H20's memory clock is 1313 MHz with 5.3 Gbps effective, while the RTX 4070's memory clock is also 1313 MHz but with 21 Gbps effective. The effective data rate difference reflects the different memory types.
The RTX 4070 supports display outputs with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The H20 has no display outputs. The RTX 4070 is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The H20 is an SXM module with no power connectors listed and a suggested PSU of 900 W. The RTX 4070 has a 240 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width, while the H20 has no dimensions recorded.
Specification Differences
The RTX 4070 has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The H20 has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 1980 MHz. The RTX 4070's memory operates at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective, while the H20's memory operates at 1313 MHz with 5.3 Gbps effective.
The RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The H20 has 9,984 shading units, 312 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The RTX 4070 has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The H20 has no RT cores listed and 312 tensor cores.
The RTX 4070's pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. The H20's pixel rate is 47.52 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 617.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 and 39.54 TFLOPS for the H20. FP16 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RTX 4070 and 79.07 TFLOPS (2:1) for the H20.
The RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W and is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The H20 has a TDP of 500 W and is an SXM module with no power connectors. The suggested PSU is 550 W for the RTX 4070 and 900 W for the H20. The RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the H20 uses PCIe 5.0 x16.
The RTX 4070 was released on 2023-04-11 and is end-of-life, with a predecessor in the GeForce 30 series and successor in the GeForce 50 series. The H20 was released on 2024-01-31 and is active, with a predecessor in Server Ada and successor in Server Blackwell. The RTX 4070 has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the H20 has no launch MSRP recorded. The RTX 4070 has dimensions of 240 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm, while the H20 has no dimensions recorded.