NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA T600 Comparison

The NVIDIA T600 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 sit at opposite ends of the professional and consumer graphics spectrum, and the recorded data makes the split unusually clean. The T600 is a single-slot, no-power-connector workstation card built on the 12 nm TU117 Turing chip, drawing just 40 W. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a triple-slot, 285 W gaming flagship built on the 5 nm AD102 die, carrying a launch MSRP of 799 USD. Both are now end-of-life parts, but they target fundamentally different jobs: the T600 is a compact display-and-light-compute part sitting in the 39th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a 36th-percentile entry by the database's composite scoring, with a very different profile underneath that number.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward split. Choose the T600 when power, space, and display connectivity are the constraints: it needs no auxiliary power connector, occupies a single slot, and drives four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs from a 40 W envelope. Its suggested PSU is only 200 W, which means it can drop into small-form-factor and OEM systems that cannot host anything larger.

Choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 when raw throughput matters. Its FP32 compute is 44.10 TFLOPS against the T600's 1.709 TFLOPS, its memory bandwidth is 672.3 GB/s against 160.0 GB/s, and its memory capacity is 16 GB against 4 GB. Those are not close contests; they are different classes of hardware. The trade-off is a triple-slot, 310 mm long card with a 285 W TDP, a 16-pin power connector, and a 600 W suggested PSU.

One caveat from the database: the two cards share almost no benchmark tests, so the percentile fields should be read as placement within the full GPU population rather than as a direct comparison. The T600 has nine recorded results; the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has one.

Architecture Differences

The generational gap is wide. The T600 uses the TU117 chip on TSMC's 12 nm process, part of the Turing-based Quadro Tx000 generation that succeeded Quadro Volta and was itself succeeded by Workstation Ampere. It packs 4,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, for a density of 23.5M transistors per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the AD102 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, part of the GeForce 40 generation that followed GeForce 30 and preceded GeForce 50. Its 76,300 million transistors occupy 609 mm² at a density of 125.3M per mm².

The resource counts scale accordingly. The T600 has 640 shading units, 40 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and no RT or tensor cores listed in the database. The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. That means hardware ray tracing and tensor acceleration are recorded features on the Ada card and absent from the T600's data sheet.

Clocks diverge just as sharply. The T600 runs a 735 MHz base and 1335 MHz boost, with memory at an effective 10 Gbps. The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 runs a 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost, with GDDR6X at an effective 21 Gbps. The memory subsystems differ in type as well as speed: GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus for the T600, GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus for the AD102 card.

The interface and feature sets also differ. The T600 connects over PCIe 3.0 x16 and reports DirectX 12 (12_1) support; the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and reports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which aligns with its RT core count. Both list OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. Physically, the T600's dimensions are not recorded in the database, while the AD102 card measures 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide, with one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

FP16 behavior is a telling architectural marker. The T600 manages 3.418 TFLOPS at FP16, twice its FP32 rate thanks to a 2:1 ratio. The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 lists FP16 at 44.10 TFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio with FP32, reflecting the shift in how Ada handles half-precision throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Here the database is blunt: there are no overlapping benchmark results between the two cards. The head-to-head record is empty, with zero recorded wins for either side. The T600's results cover Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan plus a suite of PassMark tests; the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a single recorded result, 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). Any direct claim of one beating the other in a shared test would be unsupported.

What the data does support is each card's standing against its own neighborhood. The T600's average benchmark score is 7035, placing it in the 39th percentile. Its nearest rivals are essentially dead-even: the GeForce GTX 680M at 7023 average (0.2 percent behind the T600), the Radeon R5 M240 at 6975 (0.9 percent behind), the GeForce GTX 675M at 6946 (1.3 percent behind), and the GeForce GTX 970 at 7157 (1.7 percent ahead). In other words, the T600 performs in the company of older mainstream GeForce mobile and desktop parts.

Its individual results frame its capabilities. Geekbench OpenCL comes in at 27875 and Geekbench Vulkan at 25580, respectable for a low-power workstation part. The PassMark G3D score is 6479, GPU compute is 2402, and 2D graphics is 756. The DirectX PassMark tier scores are small numbers by design of that test: 114 for DirectX 9, 49 for DirectX 11, 32 for DirectX 10, and 25 for DirectX 12.

The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 averages 6270 from its single Steel Nomad result and sits in the 36th percentile. Its listed rivals are also tightly clustered: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at an identical 6270 average (0 percent delta), the Quadro K620 at 6282 (0.2 percent ahead), the FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8 percent behind), and the Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (0.9 percent ahead). The near-zero deltas indicate a sparsely sampled segment of the database rather than genuine performance parity across those architectures, a caveat worth noting when reading the percentile figure.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, by a wide margin: 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The T600 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 160.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the T600 need a power connector?

A: No. It lists no power connectors, a 40 W TDP, and a 200 W suggested PSU. The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 requires one 16-pin connector, carries a 285 W TDP, and lists a 600 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card supports hardware ray tracing?

A: The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 lists 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, plus DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The T600's database entry lists no RT or tensor cores and reports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: How do their compute figures compare?

A: The 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and 44.10 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). The T600 delivers 1.709 TFLOPS FP32 and 3.418 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: Are either of these cards still in production?

A: No. Both are marked end-of-life in the database. The T600 was released on 2021-04-11; the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 on 2024-06-09.

Q: How do the two compare in the same benchmark?

A: They cannot, per the recorded data. There are no shared tests between them, so comparisons must rely on each card's percentile placement and its own rival clusters.

Where Each One Wins

The T600 wins on footprint and efficiency. It is single-slot, connector-free, and 40 W, with four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, making it the natural fit for multi-monitor workstation setups in constrained systems. Its PassMark G2D score of 756 and its Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support cover mainstream professional graphics APIs, and its Vulkan result of 25580 in Geekbench shows usable general compute for its class. Against its nearest rivals it holds its ground: within roughly 2 percent of the GTX 680M, R5 M240, GTX 675M, and GTX 970.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins on throughput, capacity, and features. With 8,448 shading units, a 2610 MHz boost clock, 16 GB of fast GDDR6X, 96 ROPs delivering 250.6 GPixel/s, and 264 TMUs delivering 689.0 GTexel/s, it is built for demanding rendering, ray-traced workloads via its 66 RT cores, and tensor-accelerated tasks via its 264 tensor cores. Its single recorded Steel Nomad result of 6269.5 anchors a 6270 average, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and DirectX 12 Ultimate feature level round out a modern software profile.

In short: the T600 is the card you install when the machine cannot give more than a slot and motherboard power, and the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the card you build a 600 W system around. The database shows no overlap where the choice is genuinely close.