NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Comparison

The benchmark data presents a fascinating contrast between two NVIDIA GPUs aimed at entirely different markets: the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, a consumer-focused card, and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, a professional server product. Despite the massive architectural and memory differences, the single head-to-head benchmark shows a surprisingly narrow margin of victory for the consumer card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

In the only direct comparison available, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6269.5 points, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server trails with 5996 points. This gives the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER a 4.6% performance advantage in this specific workload. The data shows a clear winner, but the question is why a card with nearly three times the shading units and significantly more memory bandwidth would lose.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves this win with 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. Its boost clock is 2610 MHz, and it delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The RTX PRO 6000, in contrast, brings 24064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs to the table, but its boost clock is slightly higher at 2617 MHz, and its FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS — nearly triple that of the consumer card. The RTX PRO 6000's massive compute advantage does not translate into a win in this test, suggesting that 3DMark Steel Nomad may not be the ideal workload for a server-oriented card.

The percentile rankings reinforce this narrow gap. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6270. The RTX PRO 6000 ranks at the 34th percentile with an average score of 5996. These are both mid-pack rankings, indicating that neither card is optimized for this particular synthetic benchmark. The nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with a 0% delta, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at -0.2%, and the AMD FirePro W600 at 0.8%. For the RTX PRO 6000, the closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at -0.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at -0.1%, and the AMD FirePro W4100 at 0.2%.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins in the only benchmark recorded, making it the sole victor in the head-to-head comparison with 1 win. Its advantage in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 suggests that its architecture and clock speeds are better suited to gaming-style DirectX 12 workloads. The card's 2340 MHz base clock and 2610 MHz boost clock are significantly higher than the RTX PRO 6000's 1590 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost, which likely contributes to its responsiveness in latency-sensitive tasks.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, despite losing the benchmark, wins in nearly every other measurable specification. Its 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus provides 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s. The server card's 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance dwarfs the consumer card's 44.10 TFLOPS. It also has 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores versus 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. These specifications point to the RTX PRO 6000 being the clear winner for compute-heavy, memory-intensive professional workloads like AI training, scientific simulation, and large-scale rendering — even though the available benchmark doesn't reflect it.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the better choice for anyone whose primary concern is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark. It wins with a 4.6% margin, and its performance percentile of 36 is slightly above the RTX PRO 6000's 34. The consumer card also carries a launch MSRP of 799 USD, which can be stated as a reference point, though the RTX PRO 6000 has no listed launch MSRP.

However, the data reveals that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a fundamentally different product. Its 600 W TDP, PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs target server and workstation environments. The card is currently Active in production, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is End-of-life, suggesting the server card is the forward-looking investment. For buyers who need massive memory capacity (96 GB), extreme memory bandwidth (1.79 TB/s), or the compute density of 24064 shading units, the RTX PRO 6000 is the only sensible option. The benchmark data simply doesn't cover those use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6269.5 points, beating the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server's 5996 points by 4.6%.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare between the two cards?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X. The server card's memory bandwidth is 1.79 TB/s versus 672.3 GB/s for the consumer card.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size difference?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD102 chip with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The RTX PRO 6000 uses the GB202 chip with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. Both use a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: Are these cards in the same performance percentile?

A: No, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is at the 36th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX PRO 6000 is at the 34th percentile, based on their average benchmark scores of 6270 and 5996, respectively.

Q: What are the power and interface differences?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP and uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX PRO 6000 has a 600 W TDP and uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The RTX PRO 6000 also recommends a 1000 W PSU versus 600 W for the consumer card.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 has 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses Ada Lovelace architecture, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses Blackwell 2.0. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die sizes differ substantially. The AD102 chip measures 609 mm² with 76,300 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 125.3M / mm². The GB202 chip is larger at 750 mm² with 92,200 million transistors, but its density is slightly lower at 122.9M / mm².

The memory subsystems are generations apart. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus, while the RTX PRO 6000 uses GDDR7 with a 512-bit bus. This explains the massive bandwidth difference: 672.3 GB/s versus 1.79 TB/s. The server card's memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), compared to 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for the consumer card.

Compute resources scale dramatically between the two. The RTX PRO 6000 has 24064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, versus 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: 502.5 GPixel/s and 1,968.0 GTexel/s for the server card, compared to 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s for the consumer card. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The most striking difference is memory capacity: 96 GB on the RTX PRO 6000 versus 16 GB on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Memory type also differs — GDDR7 versus GDDR6X — as does bus width (512-bit versus 256-bit) and bandwidth (1.79 TB/s versus 672.3 GB/s).

Compute performance shows a similar gap. The RTX PRO 6000 delivers 126.0 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 44.10 TFLOPS for both. Shading units (24064 vs 8448), TMUs (752 vs 264), ROPs (192 vs 96), RT cores (188 vs 66), and tensor cores (752 vs 264) all favor the server card substantially.

Power and physical specifications differ considerably. The RTX PRO 6000 has a 600 W TDP and recommends a 1000 W PSU, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU. Interestingly, the server card is Dual-slot despite its higher power draw, while the consumer card is Triple-slot. The RTX PRO 6000 is shorter at 267 mm versus 310 mm, and narrower at 111 mm versus 140 mm. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for the server card versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the consumer card. Display outputs also differ: the RTX PRO 6000 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.