GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz

TDP 350 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202

VRAM 84 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz

TDP 600 W

BUS WIDTH 448 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

5,118

3,522

geekbench_opencl

173,788

388,405

geekbench_vulkan

53,927

N/A

passmark_directx_10

182

N/A

passmark_directx_11

220

N/A

passmark_directx_12

110

N/A

passmark_directx_9

268

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,063

N/A

passmark_g3d

26,645

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

15,356

N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

Examining the test data for NVIDIA's RTX 3090 and the NVIDIA RTX 6000, a pattern of close frame rates develops. No option excels reliably over most titles. This swapping of wins suggests fundamental parity. Consumers face a true choice here. The two options provide strong visual throughput.

When benchmark scores is this matched, price and functionality grow the primary factors. Evaluate hardware RT performance, AI upscaling support, power consumption, and ecosystem quality when deciding between NVIDIA's RTX 3090 and the NVIDIA RTX 6000. Such factors might influence the balance. Evaluate holistically. The bigger picture plays a role.

Ultimately, consumers could choose based on specific requirements instead of raw frame rates exclusively. The two NVIDIA's RTX 3090 and the NVIDIA RTX 6000 offer excellent rendering results for the respective categories. This selection hinges on specific preferences. Either choice is reasonable. Users couldn't go wrong between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 3090

RTX 6000D

Core Specs

Shading Units

10,496

19,968 +90.2%

Shaders

10,496

19,968 +90.2%

TMUs

328

624 +90.2%

ROPs

112

192 +71.4%

SM Count

156 +90.2%

Clocks

Base Clock

1395 MHz

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

1695 MHz

2430 MHz

Memory Clock

1219 MHz 19.5 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

24 GB

84 GB

VRAM (MB)

24,576

86,016 +250.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6X

GDDR7

Memory Bus

384 bit

448 bit

Bandwidth

936.2 GB/s

1.57 TB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

6 MB

128 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

189.8 GPixel/s

466.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

556.0 GTexel/s

1,516.3 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

35.58 TFLOPS

97.04 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)

97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

156 +90.2%

Tensor Cores

328

624 +90.2%

Power

TDP

350 W

600 W

TDP (W)

350

600 +71.4%

Suggested PSU

750 W

1000 W

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Ampere

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

GA102

GB202

Generation

GeForce 30

Blackwell PRO W (x000)

Process Size

8 nm

5 nm

Transistors

28,300 million

92,200 million

Die Size

628 mm²

750 mm²

Foundry

Samsung

TSMC

Density

45.1M / mm²

122.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.6

12.0

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

Dual-slot

Length

336 mm 13.2 inches

304 mm 12 inches

Height

140 mm 5.5 inches

137 mm 5.4 inches

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 5.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

1,499 USD

8,565 USD

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

GeForce 20

Workstation Ada

Successor

GeForce 40

—

View GeForce RTX 3090 Details View RTX 6000D Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

RTX 6000D

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons