NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1665 MHz
TDP 350 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

CORE STATE GB207
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1500 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
5,077
2,365
geekbench_opencl
170,037
84,171
geekbench_vulkan
192,697
N/A
passmark_directx_10
184
N/A
passmark_directx_11
223
N/A
passmark_directx_12
110
N/A
passmark_directx_9
274
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,091
N/A
passmark_g3d
26,896
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
15,282
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti represent two very different generations of GPU design, separated by process node, architecture, and intended use case. The benchmark data shows the desktop-class RTX 3080 Ti delivering decisively higher raw performance in both tested workloads, while the RTX 5050 Mobile achieves that performance profile within a dramatically lower power envelope and smaller physical footprint. The following analysis breaks down the architectural, benchmark, and specification differences strictly from the provided data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 43268, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has an average score of 41187. This places the RTX 5050 Mobile slightly ahead in aggregate performance across all recorded tests, despite losing both head-to-head benchmark comparisons.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti scores 5077 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 53.4% higher than the RTX 5050 Mobile's score of 2365. This represents the largest performance gap between the two in any direct comparison.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two cards?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti features a 384-bit memory bus with GDDR6X memory delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5050 Mobile uses a 128-bit bus with GDDR7 memory, providing 384.0 GB/s. The RTX 3080 Ti's bandwidth is more than double that of the mobile part.

Q: Which GPU has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti uses an 8 nm process from Samsung. The smaller node allows the RTX 5050 Mobile to pack 113.4 million transistors per square millimeter versus 45.1 million for the RTX 3080 Ti.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W, whereas the RTX 3080 Ti has a TDP of 350 W. The RTX 3080 Ti also has a suggested power supply rating of 750 W, while the RTX 5050 Mobile requires no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: Both GPUs share the same percentile ranking of 83 among all GPUs, indicating they sit at a comparable overall performance tier despite their architectural differences.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process technologies. The RTX 5050 Mobile uses the GB207 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 3080 Ti uses the GA102 chip based on Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The transistor counts reflect this generational gap: the RTX 5050 Mobile contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, while the RTX 3080 Ti contains 28,300 million transistors on a much larger 628 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 113.4 million per square millimeter for the RTX 5050 Mobile versus 45.1 million for the RTX 3080 Ti.

The compute resources differ substantially. The RTX 3080 Ti has 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The RTX 5050 Mobile has 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Ray tracing and tensor core counts follow a similar pattern: the RTX 3080 Ti has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, while the RTX 5050 Mobile has 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. Clock speeds favor the older card, with the RTX 3080 Ti boosting to 1665 MHz versus 1500 MHz for the RTX 5050 Mobile. The RTX 3080 Ti also has a higher base clock at 1365 MHz versus 1020 MHz.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs, with the RTX 5050 Mobile using PCIe 5.0 x16 and the RTX 3080 Ti using PCIe 4.0 x16. The production status also differs: the RTX 5050 Mobile is active, while the RTX 3080 Ti is end-of-life, with the latter's successor listed as GeForce 40.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data contains two benchmark comparisons, and the RTX 3080 Ti wins both. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 3080 Ti scores 5077 against the RTX 5050 Mobile's 2365, a delta of -53.4% from the perspective of the mobile card. This is a substantial margin, indicating the desktop card holds more than a two-to-one advantage in this modern DirectX 12 workload.

In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 3080 Ti scores 170037 while the RTX 5050 Mobile scores 84171, resulting in a delta of -50.5%. The performance ratio is nearly identical to the 3DMark result, suggesting the RTX 3080 Ti's advantage is consistent across different benchmark types. The RTX 3080 Ti also has additional benchmark data available, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 and a Passmark G3D score of 26896, though no direct comparison exists for those tests.

Despite losing both head-to-head tests, the RTX 5050 Mobile's average benchmark score of 43268 is actually higher than the RTX 3080 Ti's 41187. This discrepancy arises because the average includes all recorded benchmarks for each GPU, and the RTX 5050 Mobile's limited benchmark set may weight differently. The RTX 3080 Ti's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 0.8% higher score and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB at -1.2% lower. The RTX 5050 Mobile's nearest rivals are tightly clustered, including the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 0% delta and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER at 0.1% higher.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two GPUs are extensive. Memory configuration is a major differentiator: the RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 3080 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock speeds are listed as 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5050 Mobile and 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for the RTX 3080 Ti.

Compute throughput numbers show the RTX 3080 Ti leading across the board. It delivers 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, versus 7.680 TFLOPS for the RTX 5050 Mobile. Pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s for the RTX 3080 Ti and 48.00 GPixel/s for the RTX 5050 Mobile. Texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s.

Physical characteristics differ significantly. The RTX 5050 Mobile is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and portable device dependent display outputs. The RTX 3080 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with a 1x 12-pin power connector and display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The TDP difference is stark at 50 W versus 350 W. Release dates also differ, with the RTX 3080 Ti launching on 2021-05-30 and the RTX 5050 Mobile on 2025-06-23.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 3080 Ti wins decisively in raw performance benchmarks. It holds a 53.4% advantage in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and a 50.5% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL. Its higher shading unit count, texture rate, and pixel rate make it the stronger choice for compute-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering. The 12 GB memory capacity and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth provide substantial headroom for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

The RTX 5050 Mobile wins in efficiency and physical form factor. Its 50 W TDP is one-seventh that of the RTX 3080 Ti, and its IGP design requires no dedicated power connectors or expansion slot. The 5 nm process node and higher transistor density (113.4M per mm² versus 45.1M) indicate a more modern manufacturing approach. Its higher average benchmark score of 43268 versus 41187 suggests that in aggregate performance, it can hold its own in certain workloads, particularly those that leverage its Blackwell 2.0 architecture features.

The RTX 5050 Mobile also wins on production status, being Active versus the RTX 3080 Ti's End-of-life designation. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is newer than the RTX 3080 Ti's PCIe 4.0 x16. For users prioritizing portability, low power consumption, or system integration without discrete power requirements, the RTX 5050 Mobile is the clear choice.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the stronger performer in direct benchmarks, winning both head-to-head tests by margins exceeding 50%. It offers more than four times the FP32 throughput (34.10 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS), more than twice the memory bandwidth (912.4 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s), and a larger 12 GB memory pool. Users who need maximum compute capability, particularly for gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated workloads, should select the RTX 3080 Ti based on these metrics.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is the appropriate choice for scenarios where power consumption and physical footprint are primary constraints. Its 50 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops or compact systems. Its higher average benchmark score of 43268 indicates that in the broader benchmark database, it performs comparably to or better than many desktop cards, including the RTX 3080 Ti's average of 41187. The RTX 5050 Mobile also benefits from being an active product with a newer release date, while the RTX 3080 Ti is end-of-life.

The choice ultimately depends on whether the user prioritizes peak performance or efficiency. For maximum frame rates and compute throughput, the RTX 3080 Ti is the data-backed winner. For modern architecture, lower power draw, and integrated form factor, the RTX 5050 Mobile holds the advantage. Both GPUs sit at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, indicating they occupy a similar overall performance tier despite their divergent specifications.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 3080 Ti
RTX 5050 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
10,240
2,560 -75.0%
Shaders
10,240
2,560 -75.0%
TMUs
320
80 -75.0%
ROPs
112
32 -71.4%
SM Count
80
20 -75.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1020 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
8,192 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR7
Memory Bus
384 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
912.4 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
32 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
186.5 GPixel/s
48.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
120.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
34.10 TFLOPS
7.680 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
532.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
120.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
34.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
7.680 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
80
20 -75.0%
Tensor Cores
320
80 -75.0%
Power
TDP
350 W
50 W
TDP (W)
350
50 -85.7%
Suggested PSU
750 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GA102
GB207
Generation
GeForce 30
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
8 nm
5 nm
Transistors
28,300 million
16,900 million
Die Size
628 mm²
149 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
45.1M / mm²
113.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
285 mm 11.2 inches
—
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,199 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 20
GeForce 40 Mobile
Successor
GeForce 40
—
View GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Details View GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile Details