NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q Comparison

NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti are two GPUs separated by nearly six years of architecture evolution, targeting entirely different use cases. The data shows a massive performance gulf between them, with the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti dominating in every measurable benchmark while the GRID M60-1Q leverages its unique virtualization-focused heritage. This analysis explores the head-to-head results, architectural divergence, and the specific workloads where each card still holds relevance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark between these two cards is Geekbench Vulkan, and the results are stark. The RTX 3070 Ti scores 139,541, while the GRID M60-1Q manages only 31,220. That represents a delta of -77.6% for the older card — meaning the RTX 3070 Ti is roughly 4.5 times faster in this compute-oriented API test. This is not a marginal generational improvement; it is a complete obliteration of the older card's compute throughput.

The RTX 3070 Ti's Vulkan score places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, while the GRID M60-1Q sits at the 76th percentile. This near-identical percentile ranking is surprising given the raw score disparity, but it reflects the database's wider distribution — the GRID card's single benchmark may be inflated relative to its peers, whereas the RTX 3070 Ti's score is pulled down by other demanding tests it runs. The RTX 3070 Ti's nearest rivals include the RTX 2080 Ti (deltaPct 0.5), meaning it trades blows with that previous-generation flagship, while the GRID M60-1Q sits within 0.4% of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER — a far more modern card that it somehow matches in this single test.

Beyond Vulkan, the RTX 3070 Ti has a full suite of scores: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3,478, Geekbench OpenCL at 119,718, and Passmark G3D at 23,356. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 261 and DirectX 11 score of 192 show strong legacy API performance, while DirectX 12 at 91 reflects modern workload efficiency. The GRID M60-1Q has no comparable data, making direct cross-test comparisons impossible — but the single shared test tells the story clearly enough. The RTX 3070 Ti wins the only head-to-head contest decisively.

Architecture Differences

The GRID M60-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 architecture using the GM204 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 28 nm process. It packs 5,200 million transistors into a 398 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 13.1 million per square millimeter. The RTX 3070 Ti uses Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors in a slightly smaller 392 mm² die — achieving 44.4 million transistors per square millimeter, more than triple the density of the older card.

Core configuration differences are equally dramatic. The GRID M60-1Q has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The RTX 3070 Ti triples the shading units to 6,144, increases TMUs to 192, and ROPs to 96. Critically, the RTX 3070 Ti adds 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores — hardware that simply does not exist in the Maxwell-based GRID card. This architectural leap enables features the older card cannot physically execute.

Clock speeds and compute rates reflect the process node advantage. The GRID M60-1Q runs at a 557 MHz base clock with a 1,178 MHz boost, producing 4.825 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The RTX 3070 Ti boosts to 1,770 MHz from a 1,575 MHz base, delivering 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 — a 4.5x increase. The RTX 3070 Ti also offers FP16 at 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the GRID card lists no FP16 capability. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: 169.9 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s for the RTX 3070 Ti versus 75.39 GPixel/s and 150.8 GTexel/s for the GRID.

The Verdict

The data overwhelmingly favors the RTX 3070 Ti for any modern compute or gaming workload. Its 139,541 Vulkan score versus 31,220 represents a 347% advantage, and its additional benchmarks show strength across DirectX 9 through 12 and OpenCL. The RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB GDDR6X memory with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth dwarfs the GRID M60-1Q's 1 GB GDDR5 at 160.4 GB/s — a 4x capacity and 3.8x bandwidth gap that impacts texture-heavy scenes and large datasets.

However, the GRID M60-1Q's 76th percentile ranking despite its age suggests it still competes in specific niches. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, scores nearly identically (31,087 vs 31,220), implying the GRID card's virtualization optimizations deliver unexpected compute efficiency in certain APIs. For virtual desktop infrastructure or GPU-accelerated cloud workloads where the card's "No outputs" design and 1x 8-pin power requirement fit server environments, the GRID M60-1Q may still serve a purpose — but that purpose is not general-purpose graphics.

The RTX 3070 Ti's launch MSRP was 599 USD, and it carries a 290 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU, compared to the GRID's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU. The RTX 3070 Ti is the clear choice for gaming, AI inference, or content creation. The GRID M60-1Q is a legacy product for legacy infrastructure.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the shared Vulkan benchmark?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti scores 139,541 compared to the GRID M60-1Q's 31,220, a difference of -77.6% for the older card.

Q: How do their memory configurations differ?

A: The GRID M60-1Q has 1 GB of GDDR5 with 160.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 3070 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6X with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GRID M60-1Q support ray tracing?

A: No. It has no RT cores, while the RTX 3070 Ti includes 48 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The GRID M60-1Q has 13.1 million transistors per mm², while the RTX 3070 Ti has 44.4 million per mm².

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The GRID M60-1Q ranks at the 76th percentile, slightly above the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile.

Q: What is the RTX 3070 Ti's DirectX 12 score?

A: It scores 91 in Passmark DirectX 12, alongside 3,478 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 3070 Ti wins every measurable benchmark category. Its 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles modern game engines, while the 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing that the GRID card cannot perform at all. The 192 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads like DLSS and neural network inference — the GRID M60-1Q has none. Memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s supports high-resolution textures and large data sets, and the 8 GB capacity allows modern game assets to load without swapping. Display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a) make it immediately usable for any desktop setup.

The GRID M60-1Q's only advantage lies in its virtualization-oriented design. With no display outputs, it is built for headless server deployments where multiple virtual machines share GPU resources. Its 225 W TDP is lower than the RTX 3070 Ti's 290 W, and its 1x 8-pin power connector is more common in existing enterprise server infrastructure than the RTX 3070 Ti's 1x 12-pin. The 1 GB memory footprint, while tiny by modern standards, may suffice for specific virtual desktop workloads that do not demand large frame buffers. Its 76th percentile ranking against all GPUs, despite being from 2015, suggests it remains competitive in niche compute tasks where Maxwell's architecture excels.

Specification Differences

| Specification | GRID M60-1Q | RTX 3070 Ti |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |

| Process Node | 28 nm (TSMC) | 8 nm (Samsung) |

| Transistors | 5,200 million | 17,400 million |

| Die Size | 398 mm² | 392 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 13.1M / mm² | 44.4M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 557 MHz | 1575 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1770 MHz |

| Memory Size | 1024 MB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | None | 48 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 192 |

| Pixel Rate | 75.39 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 150.8 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.825 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | None | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 225 W | 290 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Release Date | 2015-08-29 | 2021-05-30 |