NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

CORE STATE TU106
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1620 MHz
TDP 175 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1680 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,569
N/A
geekbench_opencl
79,966
97,178
geekbench_vulkan
82,521
73,002
passmark_directx_10
111
105
passmark_directx_11
129
127
passmark_directx_12
60
66
passmark_directx_9
211
157
passmark_g2d
819
585
passmark_g3d
16,094
14,796
passmark_gpu_compute
6,411
6,394

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

The benchmark data presents a clear split between the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070. The RTX A4000 Mobile wins decisively in compute-oriented workloads, while the GeForce RTX 2070 dominates in legacy DirectX and 2D tests. The overall average benchmark score favors the RTX A4000 Mobile at 21,379 versus 18,789 for the RTX 2070, but the head-to-head results tell a more nuanced story. The RTX 2070 wins 7 of the 9 direct comparisons, yet the RTX A4000 Mobile’s victories come in the most modern and compute-heavy categories.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant victory for the RTX A4000 Mobile is in Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 97,178 against the RTX 2070’s 79,966. That is a 21.5% advantage, and it reflects the mobile workstation card’s much higher raw compute capability. The RTX A4000 Mobile also wins in the Passmark DirectX 12 test, scoring 66 versus 60, a 10% lead. These two wins are the only ones for the RTX A4000 Mobile, but they are substantial in their respective domains.

The GeForce RTX 2070’s largest head-to-head win comes in the Passmark DirectX 9 test, where it scores 211 against the RTX A4000 Mobile’s 157. That is a 25.6% margin, the largest of any comparison. The RTX 2070 also leads by 28.6% in Passmark G2D (819 versus 585), which measures 2D graphics performance and desktop throughput. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 2070 scores 82,521 against 73,002, an 11.5% edge. The remaining wins for the RTX 2070 are narrower: Passmark DirectX 10 at 111 versus 105 (5.4% ahead), Passmark DirectX 11 at 129 versus 127 (1.6% ahead), Passmark G3D at 16,094 versus 14,796 (8.1% ahead), and Passmark GPU Compute at 6,411 versus 6,394 (a slim 0.3% margin).

Notably, the RTX A4000 Mobile’s average benchmark score across all tests is 21,379, which places it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The RTX 2070’s average is 18,789, at the 63rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the RTX A4000 Mobile include the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 at an average score of 21,629 (1.2% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21,153 (1.1% lower). For the RTX 2070, the closest competitor is the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18,954 (0.9% higher) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT at 18,685 (0.6% lower). The data shows that the RTX A4000 Mobile sits in a higher performance tier overall, despite losing most direct tests.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX A4000 Mobile is the clear choice for modern, compute-intensive workloads. Its 21.5% lead in OpenCL and 10% lead in DirectX 12 point to a design optimized for current APIs and parallel processing. The card’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 17.20 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio) underscore its strength in shader-heavy and general-purpose compute tasks. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, while lower than the RTX 2070’s 448.0 GB/s, does not hinder it in these specific tests.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is better suited for legacy and 2D-oriented workloads. Its 25.6% lead in DirectX 9 and 28.6% lead in G2D are substantial, and it also wins in DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 by small margins. The RTX 2070’s 14.93 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) is a different implementation, favoring throughput on half-precision data but not matching the RTX A4000 Mobile’s 1:1 FP16 rate. For gamers or users running older titles, the RTX 2070’s higher scores in DirectX 9, 10, and 11 make it the more capable option in those scenarios. The RTX A4000 Mobile’s lower DirectX 9 score (157 versus 211) suggests it prioritizes newer graphics paths.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile has a higher average benchmark score of 21,379, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070’s 18,789.

Q: How much faster is the RTX A4000 Mobile in OpenCL?

A: The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 97,178 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 21.5% higher than the RTX 2070’s 79,966.

Q: Does the GeForce RTX 2070 win any DirectX 12 test?

A: No, the RTX 2070 loses the Passmark DirectX 12 test, scoring 60 against the RTX A4000 Mobile’s 66, a 10% deficit.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two GPUs?

A: The largest gap is in Passmark DirectX 9, where the GeForce RTX 2070 scores 211 versus 157, a 25.6% advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in Vulkan performance?

A: The GeForce RTX 2070 leads in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 82,521, which is 11.5% higher than the RTX A4000 Mobile’s 73,002.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX A4000 Mobile ranks at the 66th percentile, while the GeForce RTX 2070 ranks at the 63rd percentile.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every core specification, starting with their process nodes. The RTX A4000 Mobile uses an 8 nm Samsung process, while the RTX 2070 uses a 12 nm TSMC process. This leads to a major difference in transistor count: the RTX A4000 Mobile has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, while the RTX 2070 has 10,800 million on a larger 445 mm² die. The transistor density reflects this, with the RTX A4000 Mobile at 44.4M per mm² versus 24.3M per mm² for the RTX 2070.

Clock speeds also differ. The RTX A4000 Mobile has a base clock of 1140 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, while the RTX 2070 has a higher base clock of 1410 MHz but a slightly lower boost clock of 1620 MHz. Memory clocks are close but not identical: the RTX A4000 Mobile runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective, while the RTX 2070 runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective. This results in memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s for the RTX A4000 Mobile and 448.0 GB/s for the RTX 2070, both using 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

The compute units are vastly different. The RTX A4000 Mobile has 5120 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, while the RTX 2070 has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing cores are 40 for the RTX A4000 Mobile and 36 for the RTX 2070, while tensor cores are 160 versus 288, favoring the RTX 2070 in AI throughput. Pixel rate is 134.4 GPixel/s for the RTX A4000 Mobile versus 103.7 GPixel/s for the RTX 2070, and texture rate is 268.8 GTexel/s versus 233.3 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS versus 7.465 TFLOPS, a 2.3x difference.

Power and physical specs also diverge. The RTX A4000 Mobile has a TDP of 115 W and no power connectors, reflecting its mobile design. The RTX 2070 has a TDP of 175 W, uses a single 8-pin connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. The RTX 2070 is a dual-slot card measuring 229 mm in length, 113 mm in height, and 35 mm in width, with outputs including 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C. The RTX A4000 Mobile’s display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX A4000 Mobile and PCIe 3.0 x16 for the RTX 2070.

Architecture Differences

The RTX A4000 Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip, while the RTX 2070 uses the Turing architecture with the TU106 chip. The RTX A4000 Mobile belongs to the Ampere-MW generation (Ax000), and its predecessor is Quadro Turing-M with a successor of Ada-MW. The RTX 2070 is part of the GeForce 20-series generation, with a predecessor of GeForce 10 and a successor of GeForce 30. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

The key architectural difference lies in the compute configuration and process technology. The RTX A4000 Mobile’s 8 nm process allows for a much higher shading unit count (5120 versus 2304) and a denser transistor layout. Its FP16 performance is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning it can process half-precision at the same rate as full-precision. The RTX 2070’s FP16 is 14.93 TFLOPS but with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it processes half-precision at half the rate of FP32. The RTX 2070 has more tensor cores (288 versus 160), which is a notable difference despite the RTX A4000 Mobile’s overall compute advantage. The RTX A4000 Mobile also has higher pixel and texture rates, and its memory bandwidth is lower despite the higher effective memory clock on the RTX 2070.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is the superior choice for modern compute and DirectX 12 workloads, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 holds the edge for legacy DirectX and 2D performance. The RTX A4000 Mobile’s 21.5% lead in OpenCL and 10% lead in DirectX 12 are decisive, and its higher average benchmark score (21,379 versus 18,789) and higher percentile ranking (66th versus 63rd) confirm its overall advantage. The RTX 2070 wins most direct tests, but its victories are either narrow (1.6% in DirectX 11, 0.3% in GPU Compute) or confined to older APIs (25.6% in DirectX 9, 28.6% in G2D). For users running current-generation games or compute applications, the RTX A4000 Mobile is the better performer. For those relying on older software libraries or prioritizing 2D desktop tasks, the RTX 2070 is the safer pick. The RTX A4000 Mobile’s launch MSRP is not listed, while the RTX 2070’s launch MSRP was 499 USD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 2070
RTX A4000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
5,120 +122.2%
Shaders
2,304
5,120 +122.2%
TMUs
144
160 +11.1%
ROPs
64
80 +25.0%
SM Count
36
40 +11.1%
Clocks
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1140 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1680 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
8,192 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
103.7 GPixel/s
134.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
233.3 GTexel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.465 TFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
233.3 GFLOPS (1:32)
268.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
14.93 TFLOPS (2:1)
17.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
36
40 +11.1%
Tensor Cores
288
160 -44.4%
Power
TDP
175 W
115 W
TDP (W)
175
115 -34.3%
Suggested PSU
450 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Turing
Ampere
GPU Name
TU106
GA104
Generation
GeForce 20
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
12 nm
8 nm
Transistors
10,800 million
17,400 million
Die Size
445 mm²
392 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
24.3M / mm²
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
229 mm 9 inches
Height
113 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.02x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
499 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 10
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
GeForce 30
Ada-MW
View GeForce RTX 2070 Details View RTX A4000 Mobile Details