NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is in a different performance class than the NVIDIA Quadro K5200. In the available head-to-head benchmarks, the RTX 2070 SUPER delivers a decisive victory, with the data showing a 338.2% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and a 349.1% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan. While the Quadro K5200 remains a functional professional card, the architectural and generational gap is so substantial that the RTX 2070 SUPER emerges as the clear performance leader in every measured category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results leave no ambiguity about the performance hierarchy between these two cards. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 2070 SUPER scores 83,358 points, while the Quadro K5200 scores 19,024 points. This represents a 338.2% lead for the RTX 2070 SUPER, indicating that the newer card processes general-purpose compute workloads at a rate that is more than four times faster than the older professional card.

The Vulkan results are equally lopsided. The RTX 2070 SUPER achieves a score of 90,637 in Geekbench Vulkan, compared to the Quadro K5200's 20,180 points. The delta here is even larger at 349.1%, suggesting that the RTX 2070 SUPER's architecture is not only faster in raw compute but also more efficient at leveraging modern graphics APIs.

Beyond the head-to-head data, the overall average benchmark scores reinforce this dominance. The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20,282, which places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The Quadro K5200, with an average score of 19,602, sits in the 64th percentile. While these percentile rankings are close, the raw score difference of 680 points is meaningful, and the RTX 2070 SUPER's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at -1.2% and the Intel Arc B570 at -1.3%. The Quadro K5200's nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro D300 at -0.2% and the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT at -0.8%. This proximity to much newer hardware indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER is competitive with modern mid-range offerings, whereas the Quadro K5200 is closer to legacy or low-end alternatives.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures that explain their performance disparity. The RTX 2070 SUPER uses the TU104 chip based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 25.0 million per square millimeter. In contrast, the Quadro K5200 uses the GK110B chip based on the Kepler architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a larger 28 nm process. This older chip packs only 7,080 million transistors on a slightly larger 561 mm² die, resulting in a much lower transistor density of 12.6 million per square millimeter.

The memory subsystems differ significantly as well. The RTX 2070 SUPER comes equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus. The Quadro K5200 also has 8 GB of memory, but it is older GDDR5 running at 6 Gbps effective, producing only 192.3 GB/s of bandwidth on the same 256-bit bus. This gives the RTX 2070 SUPER a 2.33 times bandwidth advantage, which is critical for memory-intensive workloads.

The compute resources also favor the RTX 2070 SUPER. It features 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The Quadro K5200 has 2,304 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and only 48 ROPs. While the Quadro has more TMUs, the RTX 2070 SUPER compensates with higher clock speeds: 1605 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost versus the Quadro's 667 MHz base and 771 MHz boost. This clock advantage drives the RTX 2070 SUPER to a pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 283.2 GTexel/s, compared to the Quadro's 37.01 GPixel/s and 148.0 GTexel/s.

The RTX 2070 SUPER also includes modern features absent from the Quadro K5200. It has 40 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing. The Quadro K5200 lacks these entirely. The FP32 performance tells the story clearly: the RTX 2070 SUPER delivers 9.062 TFLOPS, while the Quadro K5200 manages only 3.553 TFLOPS. The RTX 2070 SUPER also supports FP16 at 18.12 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, a capability the Quadro does not have.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the superior performer in every benchmark recorded. For users needing raw speed in compute, rendering, or modern graphics workloads, the RTX 2070 SUPER is the only rational choice based on these numbers. The 338.2% lead in OpenCL and 349.1% lead in Vulkan demonstrate that the Turing architecture is vastly more efficient than Kepler for both general-purpose and graphics tasks. The RTX 2070 SUPER's 65th percentile standing among all GPUs, alongside rivals like the RTX 3070 Mobile, confirms it remains relevant in the current landscape. The Quadro K5200, despite its 64th percentile ranking, is clearly outclassed in absolute terms.

The Quadro K5200's only potential advantage lies in its professional branding and lower power draw, as it is rated for 150 W TDP compared to the RTX 2070 SUPER's 215 W TDP. However, the data does not show any benchmark where the Quadro wins. For professional users on a strict power budget who do not need maximum performance, the Quadro K5200 could still function, but the performance penalty is severe. The RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and higher bandwidth make it the better option for large datasets, while the Quadro K5200's 8 GB of GDDR5 is a bottleneck.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards:

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 13,600 million | 7,080 million |

| Die Size | 545 mm² | 561 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 25.0M / mm² | 12.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1605 MHz | 667 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 771 MHz |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz / 14 Gbps effective | 1502 MHz / 6 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 2304 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 40 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 320 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 113.3 GPixel/s | 37.01 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 283.2 GTexel/s | 148.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS | 3.553 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 18.12 TFLOPS (2:1) | None |

| TDP | 215 W | 150 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2 |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.2.175 |

| Height | 116 mm | 111 mm |

| Width | 35 mm | Not specified |

| Release Date | 2019-07-08 | 2014-07-21 |

| Successor | GeForce 30 | Quadro Maxwell |

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS, compared to the Quadro K5200's 3.553 TFLOPS, making it roughly 2.5 times faster in single-precision compute.

Q: Does the Quadro K5200 support ray tracing?

A: No. The Quadro K5200 has no ray tracing cores, while the RTX 2070 SUPER includes 40 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER offers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth using GDDR6 memory, while the Quadro K5200 provides 192.3 GB/s with GDDR5, giving the RTX card more than double the bandwidth.

Q: Which card draws less power?

A: The Quadro K5200 has a lower TDP of 150 W, compared to the RTX 2070 SUPER's 215 W TDP. The Quadro also requires only a single 6-pin power connector, while the RTX card needs a 6-pin and an 8-pin connector.

Q: Are these cards the same physical size?

A: Both cards are 267 mm long and dual-slot. The RTX 2070 SUPER is 116 mm tall and 35 mm wide, while the Quadro K5200 is 111 mm tall with no specified width.

Q: Which card has better Vulkan performance?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER scores 90,637 in Geekbench Vulkan, which is 349.1% higher than the Quadro K5200's score of 20,180. The RTX card also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Quadro supports 1.2.175.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 2070 SUPER wins in every measured benchmark category. In Geekbench OpenCL, it leads by 338.2%, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it leads by 349.1%. This makes it the clear choice for any workload that relies on compute performance, including 3D rendering, video encoding, machine learning inference (thanks to its 320 tensor cores), and modern gaming with ray tracing. Its higher memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s also makes it better suited for large textures and high-resolution assets. The card's 65th percentile ranking places it alongside modern competitors like the RTX 3070 Mobile, indicating it can handle current-generation software without issue.

The Quadro K5200 has no benchmark wins, but its lower 150 W TDP and single 6-pin power connector mean it can be installed in systems with smaller power supplies or more constrained thermal envelopes. Its 2x DVI and 2x DisplayPort 1.2 outputs might be useful for legacy display setups that require DVI connections, which the RTX 2070 SUPER does not offer. For users running older professional applications that were optimized for Kepler architecture, the Quadro K5200 might still function, but the data provides no performance reason to select it over the RTX 2070 SUPER. The RTX 2070 SUPER's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 also ensures forward compatibility with future software, whereas the Quadro's DirectX 12 (11_1) and Vulkan 1.2.175 support is more limited.