NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA T400 Comparison

The NVIDIA T400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 are both built on the Turing architecture, but they serve completely different purposes. The T400 is a low-profile, power-sipping workstation card for basic productivity, while the RTX 2060 is a full-fat consumer GPU designed for gaming and content creation. The benchmark data makes this chasm clear: the RTX 2060 decisively wins every single head-to-head test, but the T400’s efficiency and physical footprint still give it a reason to exist in specific systems.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are not close. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 2060 scores 65,014 against the T400’s 17,039. That is a 73.8% advantage for the RTX 2060, meaning it delivers roughly four times the raw compute throughput in this API. The Geekbench Vulkan result tells the same story: the RTX 2060 hits 65,846 while the T400 manages 15,976, a 75.7% gap. In both synthetic workloads, the RTX 2060 is categorically faster.

Looking at the broader benchmark averages reinforces this. The T400’s average benchmark score is 16,508, while the RTX 2060’s is 15,290. On the surface, the T400 appears to have a higher average, but this is misleading. The T400 only has two benchmark entries, both Geekbench tests, whereas the RTX 2060 has ten entries spanning DirectX 9 through 12, PassMark, and compute workloads. The RTX 2060’s average is dragged down by older DirectX 9 and 10 tests where it scores 190 and 98, respectively, while its PassMark G3D score is 14,111 and its GPU compute score is 5,488. The T400 has no equivalent data for those legacy APIs.

The percentile rankings confirm the true hierarchy. The T400 sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 2060 ranks at the 58th. This narrow difference is surprising given the massive performance gap, but it reflects the fact that the T400 is competing in a pool with fewer comparable low-power cards, while the RTX 2060 is measured against a broader field of modern discrete GPUs. The nearest rivals for the T400 include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (average score 16,504, delta 0%) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, delta 0.9%), showing that the T400’s scores place it in a bizarre company of high-end cards due to its limited test set. The RTX 2060’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15,283, delta 0%) and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15,171, delta 0.8%), which is a more honest reflection of its performance tier.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 2060 wins on every metric that matters for performance. It has a 6 GB GDDR6 memory pool versus the T400’s 2 GB, and a 192-bit memory bus versus 64-bit, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth against the T400’s 80.00 GB/s. That is a 4.2x bandwidth advantage, which directly impacts texture streaming, high-resolution rendering, and compute workloads that touch large datasets. The RTX 2060 also has 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, compared to the T400’s 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Those are 5x, 5x, and 3x improvements, respectively.

Clock speeds also favor the RTX 2060. Its base clock is 1,365 MHz and boost is 1,680 MHz, while the T400 runs at 420 MHz base and 1,425 MHz boost. Even the memory clock differs: the RTX 2060 runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus the T400’s 1,250 MHz (10 Gbps effective). The result is that the RTX 2060 achieves 80.64 GPixel/s pixel rate and 201.6 GTexel/s texture rate, versus 22.80 GPixel/s and 34.20 GTexel/s on the T400.

The RTX 2060 also has dedicated hardware that the T400 lacks entirely: 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. This means it can accelerate ray tracing and AI-based workloads like DLSS, while the T400 has no such capabilities. For FP32 compute, the RTX 2060 delivers 6.451 TFLOPS against the T400’s 1,094.4 GFLOPS, a gap of nearly 6x. FP16 performance is similarly lopsided: 12.90 TFLOPS versus 2.189 TFLOPS.

Where the T400 wins is in power and physical design. Its TDP is 30 W versus 160 W, and it requires no power connectors while the RTX 2060 needs a single 8-pin connector. The T400’s suggested PSU is 200 W; the RTX 2060 needs 450 W. The T400 is also a single-slot card with three mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the RTX 2060 is dual-slot, measures 229 mm in length, and has a mixed output set of 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C.

The Verdict

The data points to an unambiguous conclusion: the RTX 2060 is the superior performer in every head-to-head test and across all core specifications. If your workload demands raw graphics power, memory bandwidth, or ray tracing, the RTX 2060 is the only choice. The 73.8% OpenCL deficit and 75.7% Vulkan deficit for the T400 are not recoverable through driver tweaks or overclocking. The RTX 2060’s 6 GB memory capacity alone makes it viable for modern game textures and larger compute datasets, while the T400’s 2 GB will hit limits quickly.

However, the T400 is not without a purpose. Its 30 W TDP and single-slot design mean it can fit into small form-factor workstations or servers where the RTX 2060’s 160 W TDP and dual-slot footprint are impossible. If you need basic display output, 2D acceleration, or light compute in a constrained chassis, the T400 is the practical option. Its end-of-life status and lack of a launch MSRP field also suggest it was a niche product from the start.

For anyone building a gaming rig or a workstation for 3D rendering, video editing, or machine learning inference, pick the RTX 2060. It is faster, has more memory, and includes RT and tensor cores. For a headless server or a low-power office PC that needs GPU acceleration for basic tasks, the T400 is the sensible, low-impact choice.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 2060 scores 65,014 versus the T400’s 17,039, a 73.8% lead for the RTX 2060.

Q: Can the T400 run ray-traced games?

A: No. The T400 has no RT cores, while the RTX 2060 has 30 RT cores.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each card have?

A: The T400 has 80.00 GB/s, and the RTX 2060 has 336.0 GB/s — a 4.2x difference.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The T400 has a TDP of 30 W, while the RTX 2060 draws 160 W. The T400 needs no power connector; the RTX 2060 requires one 8-pin connector.

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The T400’s average is 16,508, and the RTX 2060’s is 15,290. The T400’s average is inflated because it only has two Geekbench scores, while the RTX 2060 includes ten tests across multiple APIs.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No. Both are marked as end-of-life. The RTX 2060 was released earlier and has a listed launch MSRP of 349 USD.

Architecture Differences

Both cards use the Turing architecture and are built on TSMC’s 12 nm process, but they are drastically different chips. The T400 uses the TU117 die with 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² area, giving a density of 23.5M / mm². The RTX 2060 uses the TU106 die with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² area, at a density of 24.3M / mm². The RTX 2060’s die is more than twice the size and has more than twice the transistor count.

The most significant architectural difference is the presence of dedicated acceleration hardware. The RTX 2060 includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, enabling real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated features. The T400 has none of these. This is not a minor omission — it changes the entire feature set. The RTX 2060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the T400 only supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the RTX 2060’s higher-tier DirectX support reflects its consumer gaming focus.

The memory subsystems are also architecturally distinct. The T400 has a 64-bit bus and 2 GB of GDDR6, while the RTX 2060 has a 192-bit bus and 6 GB of GDDR6. This is not just a capacity difference; the wider bus allows the RTX 2060 to move data more efficiently, which is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The RTX 2060’s memory clock is also higher at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1,250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) on the T400.

The compute unit counts scale accordingly. The RTX 2060 has 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The T400 has 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. This 5:1 ratio in shading units and TMUs is the primary driver of the performance gap. The RTX 2060’s FP32 throughput is 6.451 TFLOPS versus 1,094.4 GFLOPS on the T400, and its FP16 throughput is 12.90 TFLOPS versus 2.189 TFLOPS.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | TU117 | TU106 |

| Transistors | 4,700 million | 10,800 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 445 mm² |

| Base Clock | 420 MHz | 1365 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 1680 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 6 GB |

| Memory Bus | 64 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 384 | 1920 |

| TMUs | 24 | 120 |

| ROPs | 16 | 48 |

| RT Cores | None | 30 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 240 |

| Pixel Rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 80.64 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 201.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 1,094.4 GFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.90 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 30 W | 160 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 200 W | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Release Date | 2021-05-05 | 2019-01-06 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 349 USD |