NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla M4 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

CORE STATE TU106
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 175 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

Tesla M4

CORE STATE GM206
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1072 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Maxwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 28 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2015

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,011
N/A
geekbench_opencl
76,957
16,932
geekbench_vulkan
77,402
N/A
passmark_directx_10
111
N/A
passmark_directx_11
130
N/A
passmark_directx_12
61
N/A
passmark_directx_9
218
N/A
passmark_g2d
854
N/A
passmark_g3d
16,462
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
6,721
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla M4

The Verdict

The data presents a straightforward outcome. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the decisive winner in the only shared benchmark, with the NVIDIA Tesla M4 trailing by a substantial margin. For any workload that relies on standard compute performance, the RTX 2060 SUPER is the clear choice. The Tesla M4, with its single benchmark result, occupies a different performance tier, and the data does not support its selection over the 2060 SUPER for general tasks. The RTX 2060 SUPER's percentile ranking of 62 among all GPUs, compared to the Tesla M4's percentile of 60, reinforces its superior standing in the broader performance hierarchy.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on entirely different NVIDIA architectures, which explains their vast performance gap. The RTX 2060 SUPER utilizes the TU106 chip based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 24.3M / mm². In contrast, the Tesla M4 uses the GM206 chip based on the older Maxwell 2.0 architecture, also made by TSMC, but on a larger 28 nm process. The M4's die is 228 mm² and houses 2,940 million transistors, yielding a density of 12.9M / mm².

The compute resources differ significantly. The RTX 2060 SUPER has 2,176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, features entirely absent from the Tesla M4, which offers 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The Turing card's FP32 throughput is 7.181 TFLOPS, and it supports FP16 at 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1). The Maxwell card's FP32 rate is 2.195 TFLOPS, and it has no FP16 capability listed.

The memory subsystems are also distinct. The RTX 2060 SUPER pairs 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Tesla M4 offers 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, with only 88.00 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds differ as well: the 2060 SUPER runs at a 1470 MHz base and 1650 MHz boost, while the M4 runs at 872 MHz base and 1072 MHz boost. The RTX 2060 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the Tesla M4 supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only common benchmark between the two cards is the Geekbench OpenCL test, and the result is a landslide. The RTX 2060 SUPER scores 76,957 points, while the Tesla M4 scores 16,932 points. The delta is 354.5%, meaning the RTX 2060 SUPER delivers more than four and a half times the OpenCL performance of the Tesla M4. This single data point is the definitive comparison available in this dataset.

The RTX 2060 SUPER's broader benchmark suite further contextualizes its strength. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 18,093, which places it within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18,159) and 0.5% of the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18,189). The Tesla M4's average score is 16,932, which is 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17,019) and 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17,037). Notably, the M4 sits 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA T400 4 GB (16,792). These rival comparisons show that while both cards are in a similar overall percentile band, the 2060 SUPER sits at the top of its immediate peer group, whereas the M4 is closer to the bottom.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER, with an FP32 rate of 7.181 TFLOPS, is substantially ahead of the Tesla M4's 2.195 TFLOPS. This is corroborated by the Geekbench OpenCL result, where the 2060 SUPER scores 76,957 versus 16,932.

Q: Can the Tesla M4 handle modern graphics APIs?

A: The Tesla M4 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, it lacks the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and the RT and tensor cores found on the RTX 2060 SUPER.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus. The Tesla M4 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with 88.00 GB/s bandwidth on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The Tesla M4 has a much lower TDP of 50 W, compared to the RTX 2060 SUPER's 175 W. The M4 also requires a simpler power setup, with no listed power connectors, and a 250 W suggested PSU versus 450 W for the 2060 SUPER.

Q: How do their physical sizes compare?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 229 mm in length, 113 mm in height, and 35 mm in width. The Tesla M4 is a single-slot card, but its dimensions are not provided in the data.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER was released on 2019-07-08, while the Tesla M4 was released earlier on 2015-11-09. Both are now end-of-life products.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the available data, the RTX 2060 SUPER is the winner in virtually every measurable category. Its single benchmark win is decisive, with a 354.5% lead in Geekbench OpenCL. This translates to a clear advantage in any compute-heavy application, from rendering to general-purpose GPU workloads.

The Tesla M4's sole advantage lies in its power profile. With a TDP of 50 W, it consumes 125 W less than the RTX 2060 SUPER's 175 W. This makes it suitable for environments with strict power or thermal constraints, particularly where a single-slot, low-profile card is required. Its lack of display outputs also indicates it is designed for server-side compute tasks, not desktop graphics.

For gaming, the RTX 2060 SUPER is the only viable option, as the Tesla M4 has no display outputs and thus cannot drive a monitor. The 2060 SUPER's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, along with its RT and tensor cores, positions it for modern rendering features, though the data does not include specific gaming benchmarks.

In terms of performance per watt, the RTX 2060 SUPER delivers 7.181 TFLOPS at 175 W, which is roughly 41 TFLOPS per kilowatt. The Tesla M4 delivers 2.195 TFLOPS at 50 W, which is approximately 43.9 TFLOPS per kilowatt. While the M4 is nominally more efficient per watt, its absolute performance is far too low to be competitive.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards:

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla M4 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 10,800 million | 2,940 million |

| Die Size | 445 mm² | 228 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 24.3M / mm² | 12.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1470 MHz | 872 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1072 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1375 MHz (5.5 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 88.00 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2176 | 1024 |

| TMUs | 136 | 64 |

| ROPs | 64 | 32 |

| RT Cores | 34 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 272 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | 34.30 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 224.4 GTexel/s | 68.61 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.181 TFLOPS | 2.195 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | null |

| TDP | 175 W | 50 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | null |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 250 W |

| Display Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Dimensions (LxHxW) | 229 mm x 113 mm x 35 mm | null |

| Release Date | 2019-07-08 | 2015-11-09 |

| Launch MSRP | 399 USD | null |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 2060 SUPER
Tesla M4
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,176
1,024 -52.9%
Shaders
2,176
1,024 -52.9%
TMUs
136
64 -52.9%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
SM Count
34
Clocks
Base Clock
1470 MHz
872 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1072 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1375 MHz 5.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
88.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 KB (per SMM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
34.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
224.4 GTexel/s
68.61 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.181 TFLOPS
2.195 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
224.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
68.61 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
14.36 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
34
Tensor Cores
272
Power
TDP
175 W
50 W
TDP (W)
175
50 -71.4%
Suggested PSU
450 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
GPU Name
TU106
GM206
Generation
GeForce 20
Tesla Maxwell (Mxx)
Process Size
12 nm
28 nm
Transistors
10,800 million
2,940 million
Die Size
445 mm²
228 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
24.3M / mm²
12.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.2
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
229 mm 9 inches
Height
113 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.02x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
399 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 10
Tesla Kepler
Successor
GeForce 30
Tesla Pascal
View GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Details View Tesla M4 Details