NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data paints two completely different profiles for these NVIDIA cards. The GTX 750, a Maxwell-generation part from 2014, is a low-power entry-level card that excels in compute workloads measured by Geekbench. It scores 4,274 in Geekbench Metal, 9,315 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 8,078 in Geekbench Vulkan. These are the only recorded measurements for this card in the database, and they show a consistent ability to handle general-purpose compute tasks across all three major API frameworks.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, by contrast, has a single recorded benchmark: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 6,269.5. This is a modern DirectX 12 gaming workload that stresses rasterization, geometry, and memory bandwidth. The GTX 750 has no corresponding 3DMark result, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has no Geekbench results. The database records zero head-to-head benchmark wins for either card, because they simply share no common test data.

The practical interpretation is straightforward. The GTX 750 wins in legacy compute scenarios and API-level tests where its Maxwell architecture still executes workloads without issue. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in any modern DirectX 12 gaming or rendering workload, which is the category represented by its Steel Nomad score. The GTX 750's average benchmark score sits at 7,222 across three tests, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average is 6,270 from its single test. These averages are not directly comparable because they measure different workloads, but they do indicate the GTX 750 posts higher raw numbers in its tested categories.

The percentile rankings reinforce the split. The GTX 750 sits in the 40th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits in the 36th percentile. Despite the enormous generational gap in hardware capabilities, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's percentile is dragged down by the fact that its only recorded test is a demanding modern workload, while the GTX 750's percentile benefits from three older, less demanding compute tests. The data does not support a claim that the GTX 750 is faster overall. It supports the claim that these cards occupy different test ecosystems.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards is massive, and the database records every major difference. The GTX 750 uses the GM107 chip built on Maxwell architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 28 nm process. It contains 1,870 million transistors on a 148 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 12.6 million per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD102 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture, also from TSMC but on a 5 nm process. It packs 76,300 million transistors onto a 609 mm² die, achieving 125.3 million transistors per mm². That is roughly a tenfold increase in transistor density.

The core configurations are in different leagues. The GTX 750 has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The newer card also adds 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, features that simply do not exist on the Maxwell part. The GTX 750's pixel rate is 17.36 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 34.72 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 1,111.0 GFLOPS for the GTX 750 versus 44.10 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The newer card also handles FP16 at 44.10 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the GTX 750 has no recorded FP16 capability.

Memory tells a similar story. The GTX 750 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 80.19 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s. Clock speeds differ as well: the GTX 750 runs at a base of 1020 MHz with a boost of 1085 MHz, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. The GTX 750 memory runs at 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective), while the newer card runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Power and physical design are equally divergent. The GTX 750 is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a 55 W TDP, requiring a suggested 250 W PSU. It measures 145 mm (5.7 inches) in length. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card with a single 16-pin connector and a 285 W TDP, requiring a 600 W PSU. It measures 310 mm (12.2 inches) long, 140 mm (5.5 inches) tall, and 61 mm (2.4 inches) wide. The bus interface also advances from PCIe 3.0 x16 to PCIe 4.0 x16. API support moves from DirectX 12 (11_0) to DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 remain the same on both.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no recorded head-to-head benchmark results between the GTX 750 and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in the database. The wins counter shows zero for both cards. This is an unusual situation for a comparison page, but the individual benchmark scores still allow for meaningful analysis within each card's own test set.

The GTX 750's strongest result is Geekbench OpenCL at 9,315, which is notably higher than its Vulkan score of 8,078 and its Metal score of 4,274. The Metal result is roughly half the OpenCL result, which reflects the different optimization levels of those compute APIs on this hardware. The Vulkan score sits between the two. The average of these three scores is 7,222.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's only recorded score is 6,269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That test is far more demanding than any Geekbench compute workload, so comparing the raw number to the GTX 750's scores would be misleading. The Steel Nomad test measures modern gaming performance with DirectX 12's latest feature set, which the GTX 750 cannot even run at full compatibility given its DirectX 12 (11_0) level support.

Rival comparisons in the database provide context. The GTX 750's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile at 7,203, a 0.3% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE follows at 7,171 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 matches at 7,170 (0.7% ahead). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is close at 7,157, with the GTX 750 leading by 0.9%. These are all extremely tight margins, meaning the GTX 750 performs roughly on par with a range of older integrated and discrete GPUs.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rival list shows the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 6,270, a 0% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 posts 6,282, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6,223, putting the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 0.8% ahead. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6,327, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER trails by 0.9%. The rival list mixes modern and legacy cards, but the tight deltas indicate the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's Steel Nomad score falls in a narrow band relative to its nearest neighbors.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, while the GTX 750 has 512.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The GTX 750 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 80.19 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both cards support ray tracing?

A: No. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores. The GTX 750 has no ray tracing or tensor cores recorded in the database.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The GTX 750 has a 55 W TDP with no power connectors and a suggested 250 W PSU. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin connector, and requires a suggested 600 W PSU.

Q: What benchmark results exist for each card?

A: The GTX 750 has Geekbench Metal (4,274), OpenCL (9,315), and Vulkan (8,078) scores. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5.

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The GTX 750 has an average of 7,222 across its three tests. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average of 6,270 from its single test. These averages are not directly comparable due to different workloads.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division. The GTX 750 is the card for legacy compute tasks and low-power systems. It draws 55 W, requires no power connectors, fits in a single slot at 145 mm length, and still delivers competitive scores in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.9% of its average score, which means it remains a functional entry-level compute option in the database's measurements.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the card for modern DirectX 12 gaming. Its Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5 reflects a GPU designed for the current generation of graphics workloads. It brings 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, 66 ray tracing cores, 264 tensor cores, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The 285 W TDP and triple-slot cooler are the price of that capability, and the suggested 600 W PSU requirement reflects the same.

The percentile rankings are worth noting. The GTX 750 sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER at the 36th. This counterintuitive result comes from the different test sets. The GTX 750's three Geekbench scores measure compute performance across older APIs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's single Steel Nomad score measures a much heavier workload. A user choosing between these cards should not use percentile as the deciding factor. The deciding factor should be the workload.

For a system that needs basic compute acceleration, low power draw, and a tiny physical footprint, the GTX 750 remains a valid choice in the database. For any modern gaming or ray-traced workload, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only card in this comparison with the architecture and feature set to handle it. The launch MSRP for the GTX 750 was 119 USD. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at 799 USD. The database records no head-to-head wins for either card, so the verdict rests entirely on the workload-specific scores and architectural capabilities listed above.