NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200 Comparison

The data in this comparison is stark. Across the two shared benchmark tests, the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 dominates the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti, with the largest performance gap exceeding 300%. The Quadro P2200 establishes itself as the significantly faster card in every measured category, a result that reflects not just a generational leap but a fundamental shift in architecture and capability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous, with the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 winning both recorded tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Quadro P2200 scores 32,344 against the GTX 650 Ti's 7,877. This represents a 310.6% delta, meaning the Quadro P2200 is roughly four times faster in this compute-oriented workload. The margin is enormous and speaks to the massive difference in raw processing power between the two GPUs.

The second test, Geekbench Vulkan, shows a similar pattern. The Quadro P2200 posts 31,351 points, while the GTX 650 Ti manages 8,229. The delta here is 281%, placing the Quadro P2200 nearly four times ahead in Vulkan performance as well. This consistency across both API workloads suggests that the performance gap is not workload-specific but rather reflects a comprehensive advantage in hardware capability.

While the GTX 650 Ti does not win any benchmark, it is worth examining its position relative to its own peer group to understand its baseline. The GTX 650 Ti's average benchmark score is 8,053, placing it in the 42nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, which scores 8,067 (a 0.2% delta in favor of the GTX 650 Ti), and the NVIDIA Quadro P5000 at 8,039. This shows that the GTX 650 Ti is competitive within its own generation, sitting comfortably alongside other mid-range Kepler cards from its era.

In contrast, the Quadro P2200's average benchmark score is 8,686, which places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 at 8,743 and the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8,595. The Quadro P2200's performance profile is therefore closer to a mid-range modern card than an entry-level one, with its average score exceeding that of the GTX 650 Ti by roughly 633 points, or approximately 7.9%. This average score gap is far smaller than the head-to-head deltas, indicating that the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests specifically highlight the Quadro P2200's strengths in compute-heavy scenarios.

The Verdict

The data dictates a clear verdict: the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is the superior GPU for anyone requiring modern compute performance. Its wins in both Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, with deltas of 310.6% and 281% respectively, are too large to ignore. Users running OpenCL or Vulkan workloads will see a transformative performance improvement by choosing the Quadro P2200 over the GTX 650 Ti.

The GTX 650 Ti, however, is not without a niche. Its 42nd percentile ranking and average score of 8,053 show that it remains a functional card for its era, but it is firmly a product of 2012. The data suggests that the GTX 650 Ti is suitable only for legacy systems or applications with minimal graphics demands. Its single win category is its own historical context, as it sits within 0.3% of rivals like the NVIDIA GRID K2 and 0.2% of the GTX 650 Ti Boost, indicating it was a solid mid-range option at launch.

For a modern system, the choice is obvious. The Quadro P2200's performance is not merely incremental; it is a generational leap forward. The GTX 650 Ti's 1,024 MB of memory and 86.40 GB/s bandwidth are dwarfed by the Quadro P2200's 5 GB and 200.2 GB/s, making the latter vastly more capable for any texture-heavy or data-intensive task. The Quadro P2200 is the only rational selection from this data.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different architectural foundations. The Quadro P2200 employs the Pascal architecture, manufactured on a 16 nm process at TSMC. This node is significantly more advanced than the 28 nm process used for the GTX 650 Ti's Kepler architecture, also fabricated by TSMC. The Pascal chip, designated GP106, contains 4,400 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 22.0M per mm². In contrast, the Kepler chip, GK106S, packs 2,540 million transistors into a larger 221 mm² die, resulting in a lower density of 11.5M per mm². This density advantage is a primary driver of the Quadro P2200's superior efficiency and performance.

The compute capabilities diverge sharply. The Quadro P2200 features 1,280 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 40 ROPs, while the GTX 650 Ti offers 768 shading units, 64 TMUs, and only 16 ROPs. This hardware disparity explains the massive fill rate differences: the Quadro P2200 achieves a pixel rate of 59.72 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 119.4 GTexel/s, whereas the GTX 650 Ti manages just 14.85 GPixel/s and 59.39 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput tells a similar story, with the Quadro P2200 delivering 3.822 TFLOPS compared to the GTX 650 Ti's 1,425.4 GFLOPS.

Memory technology also separates the two. The Quadro P2200 uses GDDR5X memory with a 160-bit bus, providing 200.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GTX 650 Ti uses older GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, capping out at 86.40 GB/s. The Quadro P2200's memory clock is listed as 1251 MHz with 10 Gbps effective speed, while the GTX 650 Ti's memory runs at 1350 MHz with 5.4 Gbps effective. The Quadro P2200's bandwidth advantage is nearly 2.3 times that of the GTX 650 Ti, which is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Feature support differs as well. The Quadro P2200 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the GTX 650 Ti is limited to DirectX 12 (11_0). Vulkan support also differs, with the Quadro P2200 supporting version 1.4 and the GTX 650 Ti supporting 1.2.175. OpenGL support is identical at 4.6. The Quadro P2200 also offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the GTX 650 Ti provides two DVI and one mini-HDMI 1.4a output.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal the full extent of the gap. The Quadro P2200 has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1493 MHz, while the GTX 650 Ti has no base or boost clock listed, indicating a fixed clock design. Memory capacity differs dramatically: 5 GB on the Quadro P2200 versus 1,024 MB on the GTX 650 Ti. The memory type is GDDR5X versus GDDR5, and the bus width is 160-bit versus 128-bit. Bandwidth is 200.2 GB/s versus 86.40 GB/s.

Power requirements are another significant differentiator. The Quadro P2200 has a TDP of 75 W and requires no external power connectors, relying solely on the PCIe slot. The GTX 650 Ti has a TDP of 110 W and requires a single 6-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is also lower for the Quadro P2200 at 250 W, versus 300 W for the GTX 650 Ti. This makes the Quadro P2200 more power-efficient and easier to integrate into a wider range of systems.

Physical dimensions and outputs also differ. The Quadro P2200 is 201 mm (7.9 inches) long and 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, while the GTX 650 Ti is shorter at 145 mm (5.7 inches) with no height specified. Both are single-slot cards. The release dates are far apart, with the GTX 650 Ti launching on 2012-10-08 and the Quadro P2200 on 2019-06-09. The GTX 650 Ti's predecessor is GeForce 500 and its successor is GeForce 700, while the Quadro P2200's predecessor is Quadro Maxwell and its successor is Quadro Volta.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is significantly faster, scoring 32,344 compared to the GTX 650 Ti's 7,877, a delta of 310.6%.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Vulkan workloads?

A: The Quadro P2200 leads with a score of 31,351 versus 8,229 for the GTX 650 Ti, representing a 281% advantage.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The Quadro P2200 has an average benchmark score of 8,686, while the GTX 650 Ti's average is 8,053.

Q: Does the GTX 650 Ti have any benchmark wins over the Quadro P2200?

A: No. The data shows the Quadro P2200 winning both head-to-head tests, with a total of 2 wins for the Quadro P2200 and 0 for the GTX 650 Ti.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?

A: The Quadro P2200 offers 200.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than double the GTX 650 Ti's 86.40 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The Quadro P2200 has a TDP of 75 W, while the GTX 650 Ti has a TDP of 110 W, making the Quadro P2200 more power-efficient.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 wins in every measurable category from the data. Its dominance is most pronounced in compute-heavy applications, as evidenced by the 310.6% OpenCL win and 281% Vulkan win. This makes it the clear choice for modern workloads such as professional rendering, scientific computation, or any task that leverages GPGPU acceleration. Its 5 GB of memory and 200.2 GB/s bandwidth also make it suitable for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The lower TDP of 75 W and lack of external power connectors mean it can be deployed in compact or power-constrained systems without modification.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti has no benchmark wins to claim, but its profile suggests a specific use case: legacy system upgrades. Its 145 mm length is shorter than the Quadro P2200's 201 mm, which might fit in more compact cases. Its performance, however, is firmly rooted in its era, with an average score of 8,053 placing it in the 42nd percentile. For users running older software that does not benefit from modern compute APIs, or for a basic display output solution in a secondary machine, the GTX 650 Ti remains functional. Its 1,425.4 GFLOPS FP32 throughput is less than half of the Quadro P2200's 3.822 TFLOPS, so it is only suitable for light, non-demanding tasks.

The data ultimately shows a clear hierarchy. The Quadro P2200 is a modern, efficient, and powerful GPU that outperforms the GTX 650 Ti by margins of 281% to 310% in the tested workloads. The GTX 650 Ti, while historically competent, is outclassed in every specification and benchmark category that matters for current use. Any user prioritizing performance should select the Quadro P2200 without hesitation, while the GTX 650 Ti should be reserved for scenarios where its smaller physical footprint and legacy compatibility are the only considerations.