NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

The GeForce GTX 570, a 2010 desktop flagship built on Fermi 2.0, and the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, a 2021 laptop part built on Ampere, represent two very different eras of NVIDIA GPU design. The sole direct benchmark comparison available shows the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforming the GTX 570 by a massive margin, but the two cards target entirely different use cases and form factors. The GTX 570 sits at the 54th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile places at the 53rd percentile, indicating that their overall standing in the broader GPU landscape is nearly identical despite the generational gap.

Where Each One Wins

The GTX 570 is a desktop-only, dual-slot card with a 219 W TDP and two 6-pin power connectors, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU. It is designed for stationary systems with ample cooling and power delivery. Its 320-bit memory bus and 1280 MB of GDDR5 deliver 152.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is lower than the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile’s 192.0 GB/s, but its 40 ROPs outnumber the mobile card’s 32 ROPs. This gives the GTX 570 a theoretical pixel rate of 21.96 GPixel/s versus 33.12 GPixel/s for the newer card, meaning the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile still wins on raw pixel throughput.

The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is an integrated form-factor (IGP) chip with no power connectors and a 75 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the GTX 570 is limited to PCIe 2.0 x16. The mobile card also brings modern API support including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the GTX 570 maxes out at DirectX 12 (11_0) with no Vulkan support listed. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has dedicated ray tracing cores (20) and tensor cores (80), which the GTX 570 lacks entirely.

In terms of compute, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile delivers 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput, while the GTX 570 provides 1,405.4 GFLOPS of FP32 and no FP16 capability. The mobile card’s 2560 shading units dwarf the GTX 570’s 480, and its 80 TMUs outpace the older card’s 60. Across every measurable compute and texture metric, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile wins outright.

Architecture Differences

The GTX 570 uses the GF110 chip built on a 40 nm process at TSMC, with 3,000 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 5.8 million per mm². The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses the GA106 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process, packing 12,000 million transistors into a 276 mm² die, achieving a density of 43.5 million per mm². The newer chip is seven times denser, which explains how it fits far more compute units into a much smaller footprint.

Memory configurations differ fundamentally. The GTX 570 has 1280 MB of GDDR5 on a 320-bit bus, while the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. Despite the narrower bus, the mobile card achieves higher bandwidth (192.0 GB/s vs 152.0 GB/s) thanks to faster 12 Gbps effective memory clocks versus 3.8 Gbps on the GTX 570.

Clock behavior also diverges. The GTX 570 lists only a memory clock of 950 MHz (3.8 Gbps effective), with no base or boost figures provided. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 735 MHz and a boost clock of 1035 MHz. The architecture differences are stark: Fermi 2.0 is a pre-DX12 design with no hardware ray tracing or tensor acceleration, while Ampere includes 20 RT cores, 80 tensor cores, and full DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

Power and physical design are polar opposites. The GTX 570 is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm (10.5 inches) in length, drawing 219 W and requiring external power. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and a 75 W TDP, making it suitable for integration into laptops where the GTX 570 could never fit.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison in the data is the Geekbench OpenCL test. Here, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile scores 57,915, while the GTX 570 scores 13,515. This represents a delta of -76.7% for the GTX 570, meaning the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile delivers roughly 4.3 times the OpenCL performance. This is the single largest gap in the entire comparison and reflects the architectural leap from Fermi to Ampere.

Looking at the nearest rivals provides context for how each card stacks against similar hardware. The GTX 570’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7770M, which scores 13,536, just 0.2% higher. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile’s closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, scoring 12,986, which is 0.4% lower than the mobile card’s 12,940 average benchmark score. Notably, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile’s average benchmark score (12,940) is actually lower than its OpenCL score alone, because it also includes lower-scoring tests like the PassMark DirectX 10 (60), DirectX 11 (76), and DirectX 12 (49) results.

The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile shows strong performance across multiple workloads: it scores 55,812 in Geekbench Vulkan, 10,093 in PassMark G3D, and 4,305 in PassMark GPU compute. It also achieves 498 in PassMark G2D and 120 in DirectX 9, indicating that even legacy API performance is respectable. The GTX 570 has no other benchmark entries besides the single OpenCL result, so its broader performance profile cannot be quantified from the data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile delivers 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32, while the GTX 570 provides 1,405.4 GFLOPS. The mobile card is approximately 3.8 times faster in FP32 compute.

Q: Does the GTX 570 support ray tracing?

A: No. The GTX 570’s Fermi 2.0 architecture has no RT cores, while the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, while the GTX 570 has 152.0 GB/s from 1280 MB of GDDR5 on a 320-bit bus.

Q: Can the GTX 570 be used in a laptop?

A: No. The GTX 570 is a dual-slot desktop card with a 219 W TDP and requires 2x 6-pin power connectors. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is an IGP with a 75 W TDP and no power connectors.

Q: Which card has better API support?

A: The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The GTX 570 supports DirectX 12 (11_0) and OpenGL 4.6 but has no Vulkan support listed.

Q: How do their overall ranks compare?

A: The GTX 570 sits at the 54th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is at the 53rd percentile. Despite a 4.3x difference in OpenCL scores, their overall standing is nearly identical.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms the GTX 570 in every measurable category. The OpenCL benchmark shows a 76.7% deficit for the GTX 570, and the mobile card also wins on memory bandwidth, texture rate, pixel rate, FP32 compute, and features. The GTX 570’s only advantages are a higher ROP count (40 vs 32) and a wider memory bus (320-bit vs 128-bit), but these do not translate into any benchmark victory.

For a user choosing between these two, the decision is straightforward if the form factor is considered. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the only option for a laptop, given its IGP design, 75 W TDP, and lack of external power requirements. It also offers modern features like ray tracing, tensor cores, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which the GTX 570 cannot provide.

The GTX 570 remains relevant only for someone building or maintaining a desktop system from the GeForce 500 era. Its 219 W TDP and dual-slot design require a dedicated power supply and chassis space. However, with 0 wins in the head-to-head comparison and a 54th percentile rank that is statistically equal to the mobile card’s 53rd percentile, the GTX 570 offers no performance justification over the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile.

In summary, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the superior GPU on every technical metric and is the only choice for portable systems. The GTX 570 is a legacy desktop part with no performance or feature advantage, and its sole benchmark result places it far behind. For any workload — compute, gaming, or professional — the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the data-backed winner.