NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE vs NVIDIA T600 Comparison

The NVIDIA T600 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE represent two distinct eras of graphics hardware. The data shows a decisive generational leap, with the T600 outperforming the older card in every measurable category, though the GTX 460 SE holds a few architectural distinctions that are worth noting for historical context.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark between the two cards is the Geekbench OpenCL test, and the results are lopsided. The NVIDIA T600 scores 27,875 points, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE manages 6,389 points. That translates to a 336.3% advantage for the T600 — a more than fourfold increase in raw compute performance as measured by this workload. This is not a marginal improvement; it is a complete overhaul of processing capability.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the T600’s average benchmark score of 7,035 places it in the 39th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 680M, scores 7,023, a mere 0.2% difference, indicating that the T600 sits in a competitive mid-range tier. The GTX 460 SE, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 6,389, placing it in the 37th percentile. Its closest competitor is the GeForce GTX 580M, which matches its score exactly with a 0% delta, showing that the GTX 460 SE is anchored to a performance level that the T600 has long since surpassed.

In terms of specific synthetic tests, the T600 demonstrates strong DirectX capabilities. It scores 114 in Passmark DirectX 9, 49 in DirectX 11, and 25 in DirectX 12. Its Passmark G3D score is 6,479, with a G2D score of 756. Compute performance is also solid, with a Passmark GPU Compute score of 2,402. The GTX 460 SE lacks these specific sub-tests in the data, leaving the OpenCL result as the primary point of comparison. That single data point, however, is enough to establish the T600’s dominance.

The performance gap is further underscored by the T600’s pixel and texture rates. It achieves a pixel rate of 42.72 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 53.40 GTexel/s. The GTX 460 SE, on the other hand, delivers only 7.800 GPixel/s and 31.20 GTexel/s. While these are theoretical maximums, they highlight the T600’s superior ability to handle modern rendering workloads that stress fill-rate and texture throughput.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA T600 than the GeForce GTX 460 SE in OpenCL?

A: The T600 scores 27,875 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 336.3% higher than the GTX 460 SE’s score of 6,389.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The T600 comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 160.0 GB/s. The GTX 460 SE has 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 108.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The T600, built on a 12 nm process, has a transistor density of 23.5 million per square millimeter. The GTX 460 SE, using a 40 nm process, has a density of 5.9 million per square millimeter.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The T600 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the GTX 460 SE supports DirectX 12 (11_0). Both support OpenGL 4.6, but only the T600 supports Vulkan 1.4; the GTX 460 SE has no Vulkan support listed.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The T600 has a TDP of 40 W and requires no power connectors, while the GTX 460 SE has a TDP of 150 W and requires two 6-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU rating is 200 W for the T600 and 450 W for the GTX 460 SE.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The T600’s average score of 7,035 is 0.2% above the GeForce GTX 680M (7,023) and 1.3% above the GeForce GTX 675M (6,946). The GTX 460 SE’s average score of 6,389 is exactly tied with the GeForce GTX 580M and 0.9% above the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 (6,330).

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is vast. The T600 is based on the TU117 chip, using NVIDIA’s Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It packs 4,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die. In contrast, the GTX 460 SE uses the GF104 chip, based on the much older Fermi architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 40 nm process. It contains 1,950 million transistors spread across a larger 332 mm² die. This explains the stark difference in transistor density: 23.5 million per mm² for the T600 versus 5.9 million per mm² for the GTX 460 SE.

The compute cores tell a similar story. The T600 features 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). The GTX 460 SE has 288 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. While the GTX 460 SE has more TMUs, the T600’s higher clock speeds and modern architecture more than compensate. The T600’s base clock is 735 MHz with a boost clock of 1,335 MHz, while the GTX 460 SE has no listed base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 850 MHz (3.4 Gbps effective).

Memory technology also diverges sharply. The T600 uses 4 GB of GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus, while the GTX 460 SE uses 1 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus. Despite the narrower bus, the T600 achieves higher bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs. 108.8 GB/s) thanks to the newer memory standard and faster effective data rate (10 Gbps vs. 3.4 Gbps). The T600’s FP32 compute is rated at 1.709 TFLOPS, while the GTX 460 SE is rated at 748.8 GFLOPS. The T600 also supports FP16 at 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1), a feature absent from the GTX 460 SE, which lists no FP16 capability.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA T600 is the superior performer in nearly every respect. Its OpenCL score is 336.3% higher, its memory bandwidth is 47% greater, and its FP32 compute is more than double that of the GTX 460 SE. The T600 also achieves this with dramatically lower power consumption — a 40 W TDP compared to the GTX 460 SE’s 150 W — making it far more efficient for any workload that relies on sustained compute.

For users deciding between these two, the choice depends entirely on context. The T600 is a modern workstation card with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, support for Vulkan 1.4, and a single-slot form factor with four mini-DisplayPort outputs. It is suited for professional applications that require current API support and high compute throughput. The GTX 460 SE, with its 1 GB GDDR5 memory, dual-slot design, and 2x DVI plus mini-HDMI outputs, is a legacy part from the GeForce 400 generation. It lacks Vulkan support and offers only a fraction of the performance. The GTX 460 SE’s only listed advantage is its wider 256-bit memory bus, but that does not translate to real-world superiority given the T600’s higher bandwidth.

Benchmark results indicate that anyone seeking modern performance should choose the T600 without hesitation. Its average benchmark score of 7,035 places it above 39% of all GPUs, while the GTX 460 SE sits at the 37th percentile with a score of 6,389. The T600 is also end-of-life, but its architecture is far more recent, with a release date in 2021 versus 2010 for the GTX 460 SE. For legacy system builders or those needing a period-correct card, the GTX 460 SE may hold historical value, but for any practical purpose, the T600 wins outright.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | TU117 | GF104 |

| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |

| Transistors | 4,700 million | 1,950 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 332 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 23.5M / mm² | 5.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 735 MHz | Not specified |

| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz | Not specified |

| Memory Clock | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 850 MHz (3.4 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 1024 MB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 640 | 288 |

| TMUs | 40 | 48 |

| ROPs | 32 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | 7.800 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 31.20 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | 748.8 GFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) | Not specified |

| TDP | 40 W | 150 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 200 W | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | Not specified |

| Release Date | 2021-04-11 | 2010-11-14 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | 160 USD |