GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 90HX

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
14,315
69,000

Analysis: Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon NVIDIA CMP 90HX achieve almost identical benchmark scores in every side-by-side evaluation. The performance variations between the cards usually remain under testing variance, positioning either a valid pick. This parity renders the choice multifaceted. Secondary factors get particularly important. Value often sways the choice.

If gaming capability is remarkably close, price and features become the main elements. Examine real-time ray tracing performance, DLSS/FSR support, thermal requirements, and driver quality when choosing between Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon NVIDIA CMP 90HX. Such elements can influence the choice. Evaluate comprehensively. The complete perspective matters.

When performance is this matched, cost and extras get the primary considerations. Evaluate ray tracing support, DLSS/FSR technology, energy efficiency, and software stability when choosing between Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon NVIDIA CMP 90HX. The factors can sway the scales. Think holistically. The bigger picture matters.

At the end of the day: Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon NVIDIA CMP 90HX are closely comparable. None of the earns a definite preference over the alternative. Have value and driver choices influence your final determination. Both options might serve you well. This is a solid decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
CMP 90HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
6,400 +733.3%
Shaders
768
6,400 +733.3%
TMUs
48
200 +316.7%
ROPs
24
80 +233.3%
SM Count
50
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1710 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective
1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
10 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
10,240 +150.0%
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
128 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
68.26 GB/s
760.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
1024 KB
5 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
136.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
342.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.534 TFLOPS
21.89 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
50
Tensor Cores
200
Power
TDP
25 W
320 W
TDP (W)
25
320 +1180.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
700 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Ampere
GPU Name
DG1
GA102
Generation
Xe Graphics
Mining GPUs
Process Size
10 nm
8 nm
Transistors
28,300 million
Die Size
95 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Samsung
Density
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
285 mm 11.2 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Graphics
Successor
Alchemist
View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details View CMP 90HX Details