GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA A2

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1770 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
35,357
52,078
geekbench_vulkan
34,023
49,574
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
969

Analysis: NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

Reviewing the test numbers for NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU and the NVIDIA A2 card from NVIDIA, an obvious trend develops. NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU repeatedly provides better frame rates in our analysis. This performance edge varies from considerable to exceptional depending on the individual title. Such reliability speaks to fundamental architectural superiority. Buyers seeking visual performance should factor this in.

This VRAM advantage of NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU gets progressively critical at demanding detail settings. Ultra HD gaming consumes notable memory, and NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU offers additional buffer. This results into enhanced performance in heavy scenarios. Upcoming games might increasingly demand extra video memory. The edge grows over generations.

the NVIDIA A2 card from NVIDIA encounters issues to compete with NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU's sheer performance. In cost-sensitive buyers, the NVIDIA A2 card from NVIDIA could still represent reasonable performance, however users demanding premium performance would invest toward NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU. The gaming difference is significantly considerable to ignore. Intensive scenarios particularly showcase this disparity. The cost difference returns rewards in capability.

Ultimately: NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU secures this comparison clearly. Consumers wanting gaming throughput should certainly choose NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A1000 GPU over the NVIDIA A2 card from NVIDIA. This performance numbers demonstrates this recommendation. The games should perform noticeably smoother. It's a straightforward victor in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A2
RTX A1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
2,304 +80.0%
Shaders
1,280
2,304 +80.0%
TMUs
40
72 +80.0%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
SM Count
10
18 +80.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1440 MHz
727 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1462 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz 12.5 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
8,192 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
200.1 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
46.78 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.531 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
70.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.531 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
10
18 +80.0%
Tensor Cores
40
72 +80.0%
Power
TDP
60 W
50 W
TDP (W)
60
50 -16.7%
Suggested PSU
250 W
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
GPU Name
GA107
GA107
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
8 nm
8 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
200 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
Samsung
Density
43.5M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ada
View A2 Details View RTX A1000 Details