GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

A2

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1770 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
N/A
geekbench_opencl
31,285
35,357
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
34,023

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA A2

Examining the test results for the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD and NVIDIA's NVIDIA A2 graphics, a distinct trend appears. the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD repeatedly achieves superior performance in the benchmarking. This rendering advantage varies from noticeable to impressive depending on the individual benchmark. This reliability attests to underlying architectural improvements. Users seeking visual power should consider this.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA A2 graphics struggles to compete with the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD's pure performance. For value-focused users, NVIDIA's NVIDIA A2 graphics may yet provide reasonable results, yet buyers needing premium results might gravitate toward the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD. The benchmark difference is too large to ignore. Heavy games especially demonstrate this margin. The cost difference delivers returns in performance.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA A2 graphics isn't written off completely, however the performance shortfall compared to the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD is hard to overlook. For price-aware buyers, NVIDIA's NVIDIA A2 graphics can nonetheless be an option provided its lower cost makes up for its diminished power. But, for maximum gaming performance, the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD represents the obvious choice. The conclusion is straightforward. Capability hunters should move toward the AMD Radeon 880M card from AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
A2
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
1,280 +66.7%
Shaders
768
1,280 +66.7%
TMUs
48
40 -16.7%
ROPs
16
32 +100.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
10
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1770 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1563 MHz 12.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
200.1 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
56.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
70.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS (2:1)
4.531 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
10 -16.7%
Tensor Cores
40
Power
TDP
15 W
60 W
TDP (W)
15
60 +300.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ampere
GPU Name
Strix Point
GA107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
8,700 million
Die Size
233 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
145.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon 880M Details View A2 Details