GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 48 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz

TDP 295 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

A10G

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz

TDP 150 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

84,379

158,063

geekbench_vulkan

137,070

145,863

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA A10G

During this graphics card showdown, AMD Radeon PRO W7900 establishes its superiority convincingly. Whether you're gaming at 4K, AMD Radeon PRO W7900 dependably outperforms NVIDIA NVIDIA A10G by significant percentages. The benchmark delta increases particularly more at increased detail settings. This video card manages resource-hungry scenarios with ease. Its design advantages are obvious.

For real-time ray tracing, AMD Radeon PRO W7900 jumps further forward of NVIDIA NVIDIA A10G. Its hardware units manage demanding shadow rendering far more effectively. Players looking for modern graphics will strongly pick AMD Radeon PRO W7900. This RT performance is significant. Current AAA games progressively utilize real-time ray tracing effects.

To summarize, AMD Radeon PRO W7900 provides the superior selection in this matchup. The gaming superiority justify evaluation for anyone putting together a powerful rendering system. Even though NVIDIA NVIDIA A10G has its strengths, the performance numbers undeniably benefits AMD Radeon PRO W7900. Form your decision with this in mind. This gaming gap is substantial sufficiently to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO W7900

A10G

Core Specs

Shading Units

6,144

9,216 +50.0%

Shaders

6,144

9,216 +50.0%

TMUs

384

288 -25.0%

ROPs

192

96 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1855 MHz

1320 MHz

Boost Clock

2495 MHz

1710 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

1563 MHz 12.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

48 GB

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

49,152

24,576 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

384 bit

Bandwidth

864.0 GB/s

600.2 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

6 MB

L3 Cache

96 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

479.0 GPixel/s

164.2 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

958.1 GTexel/s

492.5 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

61.32 TFLOPS

31.52 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)

985.0 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

122.6 TFLOPS (2:1)

31.52 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

72 -25.0%

Tensor Cores

—

288

Matrix Cores

192

—

Power

TDP

295 W

150 W

TDP (W)

295

150 -49.2%

Suggested PSU

600 W

450 W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

8-pin EPS

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Navi 31

GA102

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Server Ampere (Axx)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

28,300 million

Die Size

529 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

109.1M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

Single-slot

Length

280 mm 11 inches

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

110 mm 4.3 inches

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

3,999 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Tesla Turing

Successor

—

Server Ada

View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View A10G Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

A10G

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA A10G

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons