GPU Comparison
GPU
Matrox QID PRO
CORE STATE
MP-A4
VRAM
256 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
—
BUS WIDTH
64 bit
ARCHITECTURE
MP
PROCESS
—
LAUNCH DATE
2004
VS
GEFORCE
GeForce GTX 260
CORE STATE
GT200
VRAM
896 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
182 W
BUS WIDTH
448 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Tesla 2.0
PROCESS
65 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
Matrox QID PRO
GTX 260
Core Specs
Shading Units
—
192
Shaders
—
192
TMUs
8
64
+700.0%
ROPs
2
28
+1300.0%
SM Count
—
24
Clocks
GPU Clock
250 MHz
576 MHz
Shader Clock
—
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
300 MHz
600 Mbps effective
999 MHz
1998 Mbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
256 MB
896 MB
VRAM (MB)
256
896
+250.0%
Memory Type
DDR
GDDR3
Memory Bus
64 bit
448 bit
Bandwidth
4.800 GB/s
111.9 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
—
224 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
500.0 MPixel/s
16.13 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
—
476.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
—
59.62 GFLOPS (1:8)
Power
TDP
—
182 W
TDP (W)
—
182
Suggested PSU
200 W
450 W
Power Connectors
None
2x 6-pin
Architecture
Architecture
MP
Tesla 2.0
GPU Name
MP-A4
GT200
Generation
QID
GeForce 200
Process Size
—
65 nm
Transistors
—
1,400 million
Die Size
—
576 mm²
Foundry
UMC
TSMC
Density
—
2.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
8.1
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
1.5
3.3
OpenCL
—
1.1
CUDA
—
1.3
Shader Model
—
4.0
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
190 mm
7.5 inches
267 mm
10.5 inches
Outputs
2x LFH60
2x DVI1x S-Video
Bus Interface
PCI-X
PCIe 2.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
—
GeForce 9
Successor
—
GeForce 400