Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Comparison

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, yet their benchmark percentiles sit within one point of each other (35th vs 34th). The Intel part is a 2014 integrated graphics solution from the Broadwell era, while the NVIDIA card is a 2025 server-focused Blackwell behemoth. The data presents a curious case: one chip designed to sip power inside laptops, the other engineered to demolish compute workloads in data centers, but their average benchmark scores are nearly identical. This analysis digs into where each actually wins, what the architecture differences mean, and why the numbers align so closely.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 takes the win in legacy API compatibility and integrated efficiency. It supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.4, and Vulkan 1.0, whereas the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. For older software stacks or embedded systems running legacy code, the Intel part’s lower API ceiling is not a liability—it matches what those applications require. The Intel chip also draws 15 W, compared to the NVIDIA card’s 600 W, and requires no power connectors or suggested PSU, making it viable for any motherboard with a Ring Bus interface. Its production status is end-of-life, but for maintenance of existing systems, it remains a functional option.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server wins everywhere raw throughput matters. It has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, versus the Intel part’s system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA card’s 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) performance dwarfs the Intel chip’s 844.8 GFLOPS FP32. In rendering, the NVIDIA card outputs 502.5 GPixel/s and 1,968.0 GTexel/s, against the Intel’s 6.600 GPixel/s and 52.80 GTexel/s. The RTX PRO 6000 also brings 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, which the Intel chip lacks entirely. For any workload involving ray tracing, AI inference, or large dataset processing, the NVIDIA card is the only choice. Its active production status and successor lineage (Server Rubin) indicate ongoing support.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses the Broadwell GT3e chip, fabricated on Intel’s 14 nm process. It belongs to Generation 8.0 architecture, packaged as HD Graphics (Broadwell). The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses the GB202 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with Blackwell 2.0 architecture and generation Server Blackwell (Bxx). The process node difference alone—14 nm vs 5 nm—explains much of the capability gap, allowing the NVIDIA chip to pack 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a transistor density of 122.9M / mm². The Intel part lists no transistor count or die size.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The Intel GPU uses system-shared memory, meaning it borrows from the host’s RAM, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The NVIDIA card has dedicated 96 GB GDDR7 memory, 512-bit bus width, and fixed 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds tell a similar story: the Intel chip runs at 300 MHz base and 1100 MHz boost, while the NVIDIA card operates at 1590 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Intel part has 384 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 6 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. The NVIDIA chip also features 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, which are absent from the Intel design.

Physical and interface differences are stark. The Intel GPU is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface and motherboard-dependent display outputs. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot, 267 mm (10.5 inches) long, 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide PCIe 5.0 x16 card, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested 1000 W PSU. It offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The release dates are separated by over a decade: the Intel part launched 2014-09-04, the NVIDIA card 2025-03-17. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is Server Hopper, successor Server Rubin; the Intel part has no listed predecessor or successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark entries in the data, and winsA and winsB are both 0. However, the available benchmark scores from each item’s own test suite allow for a comparison. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scored 7,764 in geekbench_metal, 4,556 in geekbench_opencl, and 6,032 in geekbench_vulkan, yielding an average benchmark score of 6,117. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scored 5,996 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, with an average of 5,996. These averages are within 121 points of each other, but they measure different workloads. The Intel scores come from Geekbench compute tests across Metal, OpenCL, and Vulkan, while the NVIDIA score comes from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run.

The percentile rankings reflect this near-parity: the Intel chip sits at the 35th percentile of all GPUs, the NVIDIA card at the 34th. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the AMD Radeon HD 8690M (avg score 6,137, -0.3% delta), NVIDIA RTX A400 (6,078, +0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce MX230 (6,077, +0.7%), and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 (6,049, +1.1%). The NVIDIA card’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6,000, -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6,001, -0.1%), AMD FirePro W4100 (5,987, +0.2%), and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5,986, +0.2%). Both parts are clustered with mid-range mobile and workstation GPUs from several generations ago, despite the NVIDIA card’s massive theoretical compute advantage. The 3DMark Steel Nomad test likely stresses different aspects than Geekbench’s compute tests, which may explain why the NVIDIA card’s raw power does not translate to a higher percentile.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has an average benchmark score of 6,117, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has an average of 5,996. The Intel part leads by 121 points.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server lists 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 does not have a transistor count listed in the data.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: No. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has no RT cores or tensor cores listed.

Q: How do memory capacities compare?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 512-bit bus and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server boosts to 2617 MHz, compared to the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200’s boost of 1100 MHz.

Q: What are the production statuses?

A: The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is end-of-life, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is active.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server |

|---|---|---|

| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 92,200 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 750 mm² |

| Transistor Density | Not listed | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1590 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2617 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 96 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 512 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 1.79 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 384 | 24,064 |

| TMUs | 48 | 752 |

| ROPs | 6 | 192 |

| RT Cores | Not listed | 188 |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 752 |

| Pixel Rate | 6.600 GPixel/s | 502.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 1,968.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 844.8 GFLOPS | 126.0 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | Not listed | 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 600 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | Not listed | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 1000 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4 |

| Length | Not listed | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Height | Not listed | 111 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | Not listed | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2014-09-04 | 2025-03-17 |

| Predecessor | Not listed | Server Hopper |

| Successor | Not listed | Server Rubin |

The Verdict

The data suggests two completely different purchase rationales. For a system requiring minimal power draw and no discrete card installation, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the functional choice—its 15 W TDP and IGP form factor allow it to operate on any Ring Bus motherboard without external power. Its higher average benchmark score (6,117 vs 5,996) and 35th percentile ranking indicate that for the specific Geekbench compute tests used, it outperforms the NVIDIA card. However, its end-of-life status means no future driver or feature updates.

For compute-intensive server workloads, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the only viable option. Its 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, 96 GB GDDR7 memory, and 188 RT cores provide capabilities the Intel chip cannot approach. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,996, while lower than the Intel’s average, represents a different and more demanding workload—likely involving ray tracing or DX12 Ultimate features that the Intel GPU cannot execute. The NVIDIA card’s active production status, successor lineage, and 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs confirm its role as a current-generation server product. The choice hinges on workload: legacy integration or modern compute density. The benchmark percentiles may be close, but the architectural gulf is enormous.