Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2300 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4010

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
2,893

Analysis: Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

The Verdict

The data presents two fundamentally different mobile graphics solutions. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is an integrated processor graphics solution built on the Panther Lake chip, designed for portability and efficiency with a 25 W TDP. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a discrete, single-slot mobile GPU from the GeForce 40-series, based on the GA107 chip with a 50 W TDP.

The recorded benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile holds a 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile. This substantial gap in percentile ranking indicates that the Intel solution, despite being an integrated part, delivers markedly higher relative performance in the database's aggregate metrics. Notably, the Intel part has no recorded individual benchmark scores, whereas the RTX 4010 has a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893.

The RTX 4010's own nearest rival data reinforces its position. Its Steel Nomad score of 2893 places it within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, delta -0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, delta -0.7%). It even trails the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923, delta -1%). This cluster of scores indicates that the RTX 4010, in this specific test, performs essentially on par with those higher-tier desktop and professional parts, a notable result for a 50 W mobile chip.

For system builders, the choice hinges on the platform. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is the only option for a tightly integrated, low-power design where the GPU shares system memory and requires no additional board space. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 offers a discrete solution with dedicated 4 GB GDDR6 memory, a 64-bit bus, and 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth, making it suitable for systems where a dedicated memory pool is required. The data does not support a single "winner"; it indicates two distinct product categories for different hardware configurations.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between the two parts is significant. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the older Ampere architecture, using an 8 nm process at Samsung. The process node difference alone suggests a major efficiency advantage for the Intel part, which is reflected in its 25 W TDP versus the RTX 4010's 50 W TDP.

The Intel chip, named Panther Lake, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GA107 chip has a higher base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, with 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 ray tracing cores, and 24 tensor cores. The RTX 4010 therefore has more raw shader cores and dedicated tensor cores, while the Intel part has more TMUs.

Memory architecture differs completely. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The RTX 4010 uses 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a fundamental distinction: the Intel IGP is dependent on the host system's memory configuration, while the NVIDIA part has a fixed, dedicated memory pool.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating feature parity in API support. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors, while the RTX 4010 is a single-slot card, also with no power connectors, but it has a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 4010 connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel IGP's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent."

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark data between these two specific parts is not present in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed. Its only performance indicator is its 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, however, has one recorded benchmark: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scored 2893. This score positions it in a tight cluster with several other NVIDIA parts. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scored 2907, meaning the RTX 4010 is 0.5% behind. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scored 2910 (0.6% ahead of the RTX 4010), and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scored 2913 (0.7% ahead). The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scored 2923, putting it 1% ahead of the RTX 4010.

The interpretation of these deltas is that the RTX 4010's performance is effectively indistinguishable from these rivals in the Steel Nomad test, with all differences under 1%. This is a remarkable result for a low-power mobile GPU, as it matches the performance of much larger desktop cards in this specific workload. However, this is a single data point, and the database does not provide scores for the Intel part to compare against.

The percentile data provides the only cross-comparison. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile at the 50th percentile sits well above the RTX 4010 at the 18th percentile. This suggests that in the database's aggregate performance metric, which may include a wider range of tests or synthetic averages, the Intel IGP holds a significant overall advantage. The absence of raw scores for the Intel part makes it impossible to quantify this gap precisely, but the percentile ranking is a clear indicator of relative standing.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal several key differences. The manufacturing process is a major divider: Intel uses 3 nm, while NVIDIA uses 8 nm. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2300 MHz, while the RTX 4010 runs at 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost. The higher boost clock of the Intel part, combined with the smaller process node, contributes to its lower 25 W TDP versus the RTX 4010's 50 W.

Compute unit counts differ. Intel has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 4 RT cores. NVIDIA has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 6 RT cores. NVIDIA also includes 24 tensor cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely. In terms of throughput, the Intel part achieves a pixel rate of 36.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 73.60 GTexel/s, while the RTX 4010 achieves 28.19 GPixel/s and 42.29 GTexel/s. The Intel part is faster in both pixel and texture fill rates despite having fewer shaders.

Compute performance (FP32) favors the RTX 4010: 2.706 TFLOPS versus the Intel part's 2.355 TFLOPS. For FP16, the Intel part reaches 4.710 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 4010 offers 2.706 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The RTX 4010's 1:1 FP16 rate indicates it does not gain a throughput advantage in half-precision workloads, whereas the Intel part effectively doubles its rate.

Memory and board design differ completely. The Intel IGP uses system shared memory with no dedicated bus, while the RTX 4010 has 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4010 is a 163 mm (6.4 inches) long, 69 mm (2.7 inches) high single-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the Intel part is an IGP with no slot width, no dimensions listed, and no power connectors. The RTX 4010 has a suggested PSU of 250 W; the Intel part has none listed. The RTX 4010's release date is April 2024, while the Intel part is dated January 2026. The RTX 4010 has a predecessor (GeForce 30) and successor (GeForce 50), while the Intel part lists none.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a higher boost clock of 2300 MHz, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010's 1762 MHz.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent."

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W, exactly double.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has 512 shading units.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the RTX 4010's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4010 scored 2893. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scored 2907, which is 0.5% higher. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scored 2910 (0.6% higher), and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scored 2913 (0.7% higher).

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Graphics 4 Xe Mobile
RTX 4010
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
768 +50.0%
Shaders
512
768 +50.0%
TMUs
32
24 -25.0%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
SM Count
6
Execution Units
8
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
2300 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.355 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
294.4 GFLOPS (1:8)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.710 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
4
6 +50.0%
Tensor Cores
24
XMX Cores
32
Power
TDP
25 W
50 W
TDP (W)
25
50 +100.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Ampere
GPU Name
Panther Lake
GA107
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
GeForce 40
Process Size
3 nm
8 nm
Transistors
unknown
8,700 million
Die Size
unknown
200 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Samsung
Density
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 4010 Details