Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA Jetson T4000 Comparison

The Intel Arc B370 and NVIDIA Jetson T4000 are both active GPUs in the database, but they occupy different design spaces. The Arc B370 is an Intel Panther Lake part with Xe3-LPG architecture, a 3 nm process, an IGP bus interface, and a 25 W TDP. The Jetson T4000 is an NVIDIA GB10B server module with Blackwell architecture, a 5 nm TSMC process, 64 GB of LPDDR5X memory, and a 90 W TDP. The database records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 for the Arc B370 and no benchmark entries for the Jetson T4000.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark result exists for the Intel Arc B370?

A: The Arc B370 has a single recorded benchmark result: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 1184. That score places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 have any benchmark results?

A: No. The Jetson T4000 has no benchmark entries, its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and no nearest rivals are listed in the database.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest recorded rivals?

A: The Arc B370 sits 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: What memory configurations are recorded?

A: The Arc B370 uses system-shared memory with a system-shared type, system-shared bus width, and system-dependent bandwidth. The Jetson T4000 uses 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which graphics APIs are supported?

A: The Arc B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Jetson T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

Q: What are the TDP figures for the two products?

A: The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP. The Jetson T4000 has a 90 W TDP and a 250 W suggested PSU, with no power connectors listed for either part.

Architecture Differences

The Arc B370 is built on Intel's Panther Lake chip and uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, produced on a 3 nm process at Intel. The Jetson T4000 is built on NVIDIA's GB10B chip and uses the Blackwell architecture, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Jetson T4000 has a recorded die size of 391 mm², while the Arc B370's die size is not listed. Both transistor counts are recorded as unknown, and the database does not list cache sizes for either product.

The compute blocks differ in scale and composition. The Arc B370 contains 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The Jetson T4000 contains 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. The Jetson T4000 also lists 64 tensor cores, while the Arc B370 has no tensor core count in the database. The FP16 ratio differs as well: the Arc B370 records 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, while the Jetson T4000 records 4.700 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Memory and interface design separate the two products. The Arc B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and connects through an IGP bus interface. The Jetson T4000 uses 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth and connects through PCIe 5.0 x8. The Arc B370's display outputs are portable device dependent, while the Jetson T4000 has no outputs. The Arc B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4; the Jetson T4000 lists N/A for all three. Both parts have an IGP slot width and no power connectors, but the Jetson T4000 has a 90 W TDP and a 250 W suggested PSU, versus a 25 W TDP for the Arc B370. The Jetson T4000 lists Server Hopper as its predecessor and Server Rubin as its successor, while the Arc B370 has no predecessor or successor listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two products. The Arc B370 has one benchmark result: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 1184. The Jetson T4000 has no benchmark entries, so its average benchmark score is 0 and no nearest rivals are listed. As a result, the database shows zero head-to-head wins for each product.

The Arc B370's nearest rivals provide the only measured context for its score. The 1184 result is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186, and 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which scores 1190. It is 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, which scores 1192, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000, which scores 1168. Without a Jetson T4000 benchmark score, no direct measured comparison between the two products can be drawn from the database.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two products differ.

| Field | Intel Arc B370 | NVIDIA Jetson T4000 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Panther Lake | GB10B |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Blackwell |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) | Server Blackwell (Bxx) |

| Process node / foundry | 3 nm, Intel | 5 nm, TSMC |

| Die size | Not listed | 391 mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Memory clock | System Shared | 1067 MHz, 8.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory | System Shared | 64 GB LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1280 | 1536 |

| Texture mapping units | 40 | 48 |

| ROPs | 20 | 16 |

| Ray tracing cores | 10 | 12 |

| Tensor cores | Not listed | 64 |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 24.48 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 73.44 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 6.144 TFLOPS | 4.700 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.700 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 90 W |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 250 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| APIs | DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4 | N/A |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 87 mm (3.4 in) x 100 mm (3.9 in) x 15 mm (0.6 in) |

| Release date | 2026-01-26 | 2026-01-04 |

| Predecessor | Not listed | Server Hopper |

| Successor | Not listed | Server Rubin |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 1,999 USD |

| 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 | 1184 | No entries |

| Average benchmark score | 1184 | 0 |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 5 | 50 |

| Nearest rivals | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, AMD Radeon HD 7650M, AMD FirePro M2000 | None |

The Verdict

The recorded data points to different roles. The Arc B370 is the only one of the two with a measured benchmark score, a graphics API stack, and display outputs. Its 1184 score places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and AMD FirePro M2000. It leads the Jetson T4000 in FP32 throughput, FP16 throughput, pixel rate, texture rate, and ROP count, while drawing 25 W.

The Jetson T4000 is the only one of the two with a dedicated memory subsystem, 64 GB LPDDR5X, 273.2 GB/s bandwidth, 64 tensor cores, and a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. It has no recorded benchmarks, no API support, and no display outputs. The database assigns it the 50th percentile among all GPUs, but that percentile sits alongside an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty nearest-rival list, so it cannot be treated as a measured performance result. The data supports the Arc B370 for workloads that need a graphics API stack, display output, and higher FP32 and FP16 throughput. The data supports the Jetson T4000 for workloads that need a large dedicated memory pool, tensor cores, and a PCIe 5.0 x8 server interface.

Where Each One Wins

The database records no head-to-head benchmark wins for either product. The use-case split below follows from specification differences.

• Arc B370: Graphics API and display workloads. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Jetson T4000 lists N/A for all three. It also has display outputs, while the Jetson T4000 has none.
• Arc B370: Throughput-sensitive graphics tasks. It posts 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, 12.29 TFLOPS FP16, 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate, all above the Jetson T4000's 4.700 TFLOPS, 24.48 GPixel/s, and 73.44 GTexel/s.
• Arc B370: Low-power integration. Its TDP is 25 W, and its bus interface and slot width are both IGP.
• Jetson T4000: Memory-heavy server workloads. It provides 64 GB LPDDR5X, a 256-bit bus, and 273.2 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Arc B370 depends on system-shared memory and system-dependent bandwidth.
• Jetson T4000: Tensor core workloads. It has 64 tensor cores, while the Arc B370 has no tensor core count in the database.
• Jetson T4000: Higher shading, texture, and ray tracing resources. It has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 12 RT cores, versus 1280, 40, and 10 for the Arc B370, although the Arc B370 has more ROPs with 20 versus 16.