Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc B370

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

CORE STATE AD102
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2610 MHz
TDP 285 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,184
6,269.5

Analysis: Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

# Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows a single decisive contest between these two GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records a score of 6269.5 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 against 1184 for the Intel Arc B370. That translates to an 81.1% deficit for the Intel part, meaning the NVIDIA card wins the only recorded head-to-head benchmark outright. The wins tally confirms this: 0 wins for the Intel Arc B370, 1 win for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102.

The Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database, placing it near the bottom of the performance distribution. Its nearest rivals, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186 average, 0.2% ahead), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190 average, 0.5% ahead), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192 average, 0.7% ahead), all score marginally higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails by 1.4% with a 1168 average. This clustering indicates the Intel part competes with decade-old discrete mobile and entry-level desktop graphics, not modern dedicated GPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 occupies the 36th percentile, a substantially stronger position. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, matches it exactly at 6270 average score with a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 sits 0.8% behind at 6223, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 trails by 0.2% at 6282 and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9% at 6327. This grouping shows the NVIDIA card holds its own against a newer generation sibling and remains competitive within its performance tier.

The use-case split is therefore unambiguous. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 targets high-resolution gaming, ray tracing, and compute workloads that demand substantial throughput. The Intel Arc B370, with its integrated design and low power envelope, serves portable devices where space and thermal constraints preclude a dedicated graphics card. The data confirms these are not competing products in the same market segment; they merely share a benchmark entry in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally at every architectural level. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture built on Panther Lake silicon, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 employs Ada Lovelace on the AD102 chip. Intel fabricates its part on a 3 nm process at its own foundry; NVIDIA uses TSMC's 5 nm node. The Intel chip reports no transistor count or die size, whereas the NVIDIA chip packs 76,300 million transistors across a 609 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 125.3M per mm².

Core configurations differ by an order of magnitude. The Intel Arc B370 carries 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 fields 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part also adds tensor core hardware that the Intel part lacks entirely, a feature critical for AI-accelerated workloads and DLSS-style upscaling.

Memory architecture could not be more different. The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all marked as system dependent. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part's memory clock reads "System Shared" while the NVIDIA card runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. This dedicated versus shared memory split directly impacts bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The Intel Arc B370 starts at 300 MHz base and boosts to 2400 MHz, a wide range reflecting its integrated nature and power management. The NVIDIA card runs from 2340 MHz base to 2610 MHz boost, a narrower band at much higher absolute frequencies. The resulting throughput figures show the scale of the gap: the Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), while the NVIDIA card produces 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and 44.10 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The NVIDIA part's 1:1 FP16 rate indicates full-rate half-precision execution, versus the Intel part's 2:1 halving.

Process node and physical design further separate them. The Intel Arc B370 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and a bus interface of IGP. The NVIDIA card is a triple-slot add-in board measuring 310 mm long, 140 mm high, and 61 mm wide, using a single 16-pin power connector and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The Intel part consumes 25 W TDP; the NVIDIA card consumes 285 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6269.5, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The NVIDIA card leads by 81.1%.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory with bandwidth dependent on the host system. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has 1280 shading units. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 8448 shading units, roughly 6.6 times more.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a 285 W TDP, an 11.4 times higher power draw.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing hardware?

A: Both have ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc B370 has 10 RT cores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 66 RT cores.

Q: What is the production status of each part?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is listed as Active. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is End-of-life, with its predecessor being GeForce 30 and successor GeForce 50.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 |

|----------------|----------------|----------------------------------------|

| Process node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 76,300 million |

| Die size | unknown | 609 mm² |

| Transistor density | null | 125.3M / mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 16 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6X |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1280 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 40 | 264 |

| ROPs | 20 | 96 |

| RT cores | 10 | 66 |

| Tensor cores | null | 264 |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 285 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Triple-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 600 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | null | 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm |

| Production status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release date | 2026-01-26 | 2024-06-09 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only recorded benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, produces a lopsided result. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6269.5 against the Intel Arc B370's 1184, a delta of 81.1% in favor of the NVIDIA card. This is not a close contest by any metric.

Placing these scores in context reinforces the magnitude. The Intel Arc B370's 1184 average benchmark score puts it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals all sit within a 1.4% band: the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192. These are old, low-power parts, confirming the Intel chip's position as an entry-level integrated solution.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's 6270 average places it at the 36th percentile. Its nearest rivals bracket it tightly: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches at 6270, the AMD FirePro W600 sits at 6223 (0.8% behind), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (0.9% ahead). This grouping indicates the NVIDIA card performs within a narrow band of mid-range dedicated GPUs, far removed from the Intel part's neighborhood.

The FP32 throughput difference tells the same story. The NVIDIA card's 44.10 TFLOPS is 7.2 times the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. Texture rate shows a 7.2 times gap as well, with 689.0 GTexel/s against 96.00 GTexel/s. Pixel rate differs by 5.2 times, 250.6 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth cannot be directly compared because the Intel part relies on system shared memory, but the NVIDIA card's 672.3 GB/s dedicated bandwidth is a categorical advantage.

The Verdict

The data supports one clear conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 outperforms the Intel Arc B370 by a massive margin in the recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, 6269.5 to 1184, an 81.1% lead. The NVIDIA card wins the only head-to-head test and holds a 36th percentile position against the Intel part's 5th percentile.

For users selecting a GPU for gaming or compute, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the only viable choice based on the recorded scores. Its 8448 shading units, 66 RT cores, 264 tensor cores, and 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the hardware foundation for its benchmark dominance. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it in a different performance class entirely.

The Intel Arc B370 serves an entirely different purpose. Its 25 W TDP, IGP form factor, and system shared memory mark it as an integrated graphics solution for portable devices. Its benchmark score of 1184, competitive with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M, confirms it delivers entry-level graphics capability within a minimal power envelope. The 3 nm process and Xe3-LPG architecture provide modern features like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support, but raw performance remains firmly in the low tier.

The production status reinforces this split. The Intel Arc B370 is Active and released in 2026, indicating a current product for ongoing device integration. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is End-of-life, released in 2024, superseded by GeForce 50 and replaced by the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER which matches its score exactly. The NVIDIA card had a launch MSRP of 799 USD, stated once here for reference.

Users should choose based on their hardware context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers high-end dedicated graphics performance for desktop systems with adequate power delivery, requiring a 600 W suggested PSU and a triple-slot chassis. The Intel Arc B370 provides basic graphics for ultraportable devices where dedicated GPUs cannot fit, with no power connectors and a bus interface of IGP. The benchmark data offers no scenario where the Intel part competes with the NVIDIA card on performance, but the two occupy mutually exclusive physical and thermal design spaces.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
B370
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
8,448 +560.0%
Shaders
1,280
8,448 +560.0%
TMUs
40
264 +560.0%
ROPs
20
96 +380.0%
SM Count
—
66
Execution Units
10
—
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
2340 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2610 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
672.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
250.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.144 TFLOPS
44.10 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
768.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
689.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
44.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
10
66 +560.0%
Tensor Cores
—
264
XMX Cores
80
—
Power
TDP
25 W
285 W
TDP (W)
25
285 +1040.0%
Suggested PSU
—
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Panther Lake
AD102
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
GeForce 40
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
76,300 million
Die Size
unknown
609 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
125.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
—
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
—
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
799 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
—
GeForce 30
Successor
—
GeForce 50
View Arc B370 Details View GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Details