Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in the recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4627, while the Arc B370 scores 1184. The NVIDIA part wins by a delta of 74.4%, meaning the Intel part trails by that margin.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each product in the database?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184, based on a single recorded test. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average score of 43223, which includes multiple DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute tests.

Q: Which product holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile, while the Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile. This places the NVIDIA part far above the Intel part in overall performance distribution.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the Intel Arc B370 in the database?

A: The closest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (avg score 1186, delta 0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (avg score 1190, delta 0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (avg score 1192, delta 0.7% higher). The AMD FirePro M2000 sits 1.4% below with an average score of 1168.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in the database?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (avg score 43262, delta 0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (avg score 43268, delta 0.1% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (avg score 43301, delta 0.2% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (avg score 43667, delta 1% higher).

Q: What is the production status and release date for each product?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is listed as Active with a release date of January 26, 2026. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is listed as End-of-life with a release date of January 16, 2024.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The integrated graphics solution has no separate die size or transistor count recorded. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, belonging to the GeForce 40 generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm².

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a bus interface of IGP and no power connectors. It draws a 25 W TDP and fits within a slot width labeled IGP. The NVIDIA part is a dual-slot discrete card using PCIe 4.0 x16, with a 220 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 4070 SUPER also lists a suggested power supply of 550 W. The Intel part has no suggested PSU recorded.

Shading unit counts differ massively. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 56 RT cores, and 224 tensor cores. The Intel part lists no tensor core count. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part has display outputs described as Portable Device Dependent, while the NVIDIA part uses 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory, with system shared type, bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192 bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part has no dedicated VRAM, while the NVIDIA part has dedicated high-bandwidth memory.

Clock behavior also differs. The Arc B370 runs at a 300 MHz base clock and a 2400 MHz boost clock, with system shared memory clock. The RTX 4070 SUPER runs at 1980 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost, with memory clock at 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head benchmark in the database is the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4627, and the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The delta is 74.4% in favor of the NVIDIA part. This is a decisive win. The Intel part achieves roughly a quarter of the NVIDIA score in this specific DirectX 12 workload.

Looking at the broader benchmark suite, the RTX 4070 SUPER shows strong results across multiple tests. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 172795, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 205624. Passmark scores include 29995 in G3D, 17108 in GPU compute, 1184 in G2D, 344 in DirectX 9, 273 in DirectX 11, 167 in DirectX 10, and 110 in DirectX 12. The Intel Arc B370 has no recorded scores in these tests, so no comparison is possible beyond the single 3DMark result.

The average benchmark score gap is stark. The RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43223 across all its recorded benchmarks, while the Arc B370 averages 1184 from its single test. This difference aligns with the percentile ranking: 83rd for the NVIDIA part versus 5th for the Intel part. The data indicates that the Arc B370 sits near the bottom of the performance distribution, while the RTX 4070 SUPER sits near the top.

The nearest rival data reinforces this separation. The Arc B370 competes with mobile and older desktop parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, all within a few percentage points. The RTX 4070 SUPER competes with high-end workstation and mobile parts like the Quadro M6000 24 GB and the RTX 4090 Mobile, all within 1% of each other. These rival groups do not overlap at all.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every recorded specification. The process node is 3 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. The foundry is Intel versus TSMC. Transistor count is unknown for the Arc B370, while the RTX 4070 SUPER has 35,800 million. Die size is unknown for the Intel part, while the NVIDIA part measures 294 mm². Transistor density is not recorded for the Intel part and is 121.8M per mm² for the NVIDIA part.

Clock speeds differ. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base of 1980 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz. Memory clock is system shared for Intel and 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA. Memory size is system shared versus 12 GB. Memory type is system shared versus GDDR6X. Bus width is system shared versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is system dependent versus 504.2 GB/s.

Compute resources differ. Shading units: 1280 versus 7168. TMUs: 40 versus 224. ROPs: 20 versus 80. RT cores: 10 versus 56. Tensor cores: not listed versus 224. Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s versus 198.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s versus 554.4 GTexel/s. FP32: 6.144 TFLOPS versus 35.48 TFLOPS. FP16: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and physical specs differ. TDP: 25 W versus 220 W. Slot width: IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: not listed versus 550 W. Bus interface: IGP versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: portable device dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions: not listed for Intel; NVIDIA measures 267 mm length, 112 mm height, 42 mm width.

Production status and release dates differ. The Arc B370 is Active, released January 26, 2026. The RTX 4070 SUPER is End-of-life, released January 16, 2024. The NVIDIA part has a predecessor (GeForce 30) and successor (GeForce 50), while the Intel part has neither recorded. The launch MSRP for the RTX 4070 SUPER is 599 USD, while the Arc B370 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins the only direct benchmark comparison, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, by 74.4%. It also holds the advantage in every recorded benchmark category where it has data, including OpenCL, Vulkan, DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, G2D, G3D, and GPU compute. The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS FP32, 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 554.4 GTexel/s texture rate. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. These figures support heavy rendering workloads, ray tracing with 56 RT cores, and AI tasks with 224 tensor cores.

The Intel Arc B370 has no recorded wins in the head-to-head data. Its advantage lies in power consumption and form factor. It draws only 25 W, requires no power connectors, and fits as an integrated processor. It has no dimensions listed, meaning it takes no expansion slot space. The system shared memory model eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM. The 300 MHz base clock with a 2400 MHz boost suggests a power-scalable design. The 3 nm process indicates a modern fabrication node, though the database does not record transistor counts or die size for this part.

The RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, while the Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile. This percentile gap directly translates to the use case split. The NVIDIA part targets high-performance desktop workloads, given its 220 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 16-pin connector, and 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part targets portable or integrated scenarios, given its 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, and portable device dependent display outputs.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two products into different performance and usage tiers. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the decisive winner in every measured benchmark comparison. It outperforms the Intel Arc B370 by 74.4% in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and it holds a much higher average benchmark score of 43223 versus 1184. The RTX 4070 SUPER also ranks in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc B370 ranks in the 5th.

The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS FP32, which is over five times the 6.144 TFLOPS of the Arc B370. It has 7168 shading units versus 1280, 56 RT cores versus 10, and 224 tensor cores versus none recorded. Memory bandwidth is 504.2 GB/s versus system dependent. These figures indicate that the RTX 4070 SUPER is suitable for demanding graphics, ray tracing, and compute workloads.

The Intel Arc B370, despite its low benchmark scores, offers a 25 W TDP, integrated form factor, and no power connector requirement. It uses a 3 nm process and the Xe3-LPG architecture. The data suggests this part is designed for low-power portable devices, not high-end desktop gaming or rendering. Its nearest rivals are older mobile and low-end desktop parts, confirming its position at the bottom of the performance spectrum.

For users with a dedicated GPU slot, a 550 W power supply, and a need for high frame rates or compute performance, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For a system where power draw and space are critical constraints, the Arc B370 provides a functional integrated option, but the benchmark results show it cannot match the NVIDIA part in any measured performance metric. The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 SUPER dominates the Arc B370 in all recorded performance tests.