Intel Arc B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear performance hierarchy between these two mobile graphics solutions. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB holds a decisive advantage in the only directly comparable benchmark, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 1515 against the Intel Arc B370's 1184. This represents a 21.8% margin in favor of the NVIDIA part, a substantial gap that places the two products in different performance tiers.

The Intel Arc B370, however, occupies a fundamentally different position in the market. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25 W thermal design power, designed for thin-and-light portable devices where power efficiency and physical space take priority over raw throughput. The RTX 3050 6 GB, by contrast, is a dual-slot discrete graphics card with a 70 W TDP, requiring a 250 W recommended power supply and occupying a full expansion slot. The data indicates these are not direct competitors in the traditional sense; they serve different device classes and user expectations.

Benchmark percentiles reinforce this divide. The RTX 3050 6 GB ranks in the 15th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile. The NVIDIA card's average benchmark score of 2329 across its full suite of tests dwarfs the Intel part's single-test average of 1184, though this comparison is complicated by the fact that the Arc B370 was only tested in one workload while the RTX 3050 was subjected to eight different benchmarks.

For system integrators building portable devices where power draw is the primary constraint, the Arc B370's 25 W envelope makes it a viable option for fanless or ultra-low-power designs. For anyone needing discrete-level performance, the RTX 3050 6 GB is the only choice between these two, despite its end-of-life production status. The data shows no scenario where the Intel part wins, as the head-to-head record stands at 0 wins for the Arc B370 and 1 win for the RTX 3050.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent fundamentally different architectural philosophies from their respective manufacturers. The Intel Arc B370 utilizes the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation that targets mobile platforms. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundries, a leading-edge node that enables its remarkably low 25 W power envelope. The transistor count and die size for this chip are listed as unknown in the database, which limits direct physical comparisons.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB uses the GA107 chip based on the older Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. This is a significantly larger and more complex chip by the numbers available: it contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The process node difference is substantial, with the Intel part using a 3 nm node versus the NVIDIA card's 8 nm node, which partially explains the power consumption disparity.

Clock behavior also differs markedly. The Arc B370 runs at a 300 MHz base clock with a 2400 MHz boost, a wide frequency range that allows it to idle at very low power and ramp up when needed. The RTX 3050 6 GB operates at a 1042 MHz base and 1470 MHz boost, a much narrower and lower overall range, but one that reflects its higher sustained power budget.

Memory architecture presents another fundamental difference. The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and borrows from the system's main memory pool. Its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," indicating that performance will vary based on the host system's memory configuration. The RTX 3050 6 GB, in contrast, has 6 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 168.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement gives the NVIDIA card consistent memory performance regardless of system configuration.

The compute resources also differ substantially. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 3050 6 GB has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 18 RT cores, along with 72 tensor cores for AI workloads, a feature the Intel part lacks entirely in the recorded data. The NVIDIA card also has a higher FP32 throughput at 6.774 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, and a much higher texture rate at 105.8 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. The pixel rates are nearly identical, with the Intel part at 48.00 GPixel/s and the NVIDIA card at 47.04 GPixel/s.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains exactly one directly comparable benchmark between these two products: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This workload tests DirectX 12 gaming performance with modern rendering techniques, including ray tracing and mesh shaders. The results show the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB scoring 1515 against the Intel Arc B370's 1184, a delta of 21.8% in favor of the NVIDIA card.

This single result is the only head-to-head data point available, but it is telling. The 21.8% margin is substantial, placing the RTX 3050 6 GB firmly ahead in DX12 gaming workloads. The Intel Arc B370's narrower shading resource allocation, with 1280 shading units versus 2304, and its reliance on system shared memory are likely contributing factors to this deficit.

The RTX 3050 6 GB's additional benchmark data provides context for its overall capabilities. Its PassMark scores show strong DirectX 9 performance at 124 points, moderate DirectX 11 performance at 72 points, and weaker DirectX 10 and DirectX 12 results at 59 and 53 points respectively. The G2D score of 882 indicates solid 2D desktop performance, while the G3D score of 10738 and GPU compute score of 5192 show its overall 3D and compute capabilities.

The Intel Arc B370 has no additional benchmark data beyond the single Steel Nomad result. Its nearest rivals in the database are older ATI and AMD parts, including the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with an average score of 1186, a 0.2% difference, and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168, which the Intel part beats by 1.4%. The RTX 3050 6 GB's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M at 2335 and the NVIDIA Quadro P620 at 2339, both within 0.4% of its average score.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the common test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB scores 1515 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The NVIDIA card leads by 21.8%.

Q: What are the power consumption differences between these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB has a 70 W TDP, requires a 250 W recommended power supply, and also has no external power connectors.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card also supports additional APIs through its 72 tensor cores, while the Intel part has no tensor cores listed.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB has 6 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 168.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are these GPUs currently in production?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an active production status, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is listed as end-of-life. The Intel part was released in January 2026, and the NVIDIA card was released in February 2024.

Q: How do these GPUs compare to their nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Arc B370's nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher. The RTX 3050 6 GB's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M, scores 2335, which is 0.3% lower than the RTX 3050's average of 2329.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB wins in every directly comparable benchmark category in the database. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1515 versus 1184 gives it a 21.8% advantage in modern gaming workloads. The card's dedicated 6 GB GDDR6 memory with 168.0 GB/s bandwidth provides predictable performance across different system configurations, whereas the Arc B370's system shared memory makes its performance dependent on the host system's memory subsystem.

The RTX 3050 6 GB also offers substantially more compute resources: 2304 shading units versus 1280, 72 TMUs versus 40, 32 ROPs versus 20, and 18 RT cores versus 10. Its 6.774 TFLOPS FP32 throughput exceeds the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS, and its 105.8 GTexel/s texture rate is nearly 10% higher. The NVIDIA card also includes 72 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads, a capability entirely absent from the Intel part's specifications.

The Intel Arc B370 wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 25 W TDP is less than half of the RTX 3050 6 GB's 70 W TDP, making it suitable for devices where thermal limits are extremely tight. As an IGP with no slot width requirement, no power connectors, and no external display outputs of its own, it can be integrated directly into a system on a chip, eliminating the need for a separate graphics card. The Arc B370's 3 nm process node also gives it a manufacturing advantage in terms of density, though the database does not provide its transistor count or die size for direct comparison.

For gaming performance, the RTX 3050 6 GB is the clear winner. For ultra-portable devices where every watt matters and discrete graphics are physically impossible, the Arc B370's integrated approach is the only viable option between these two. The pixel rates are nearly identical, with the Arc B370 at 48.00 GPixel/s and the RTX 3050 at 47.04 GPixel/s, meaning the Intel part is not universally slower in all rendering stages.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel Arc B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel foundries, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB uses an 8 nm process at Samsung. The NVIDIA chip contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, while the Intel chip's transistor count and die size are unknown. The transistor density of the NVIDIA chip is 43.5 million per square millimeter.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Arc B370 has a 300 MHz base clock and 2400 MHz boost, while the RTX 3050 6 GB has a 1042 MHz base and 1470 MHz boost. Memory configurations are entirely different: the Arc B370 uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, while the RTX 3050 6 GB has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 168.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources show a clear NVIDIA advantage. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The RTX 3050 6 GB has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 18 RT cores, plus 72 tensor cores that the Intel part lacks. The FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel versus 6.774 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, and FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel versus 6.774 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, with Intel using a 2:1 ratio and NVIDIA using 1:1.

Power and physical specifications diverge completely. The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP, is an IGP with no slot width, and has no power connectors. The RTX 3050 6 GB has a 70 W TDP, is dual-slot, has no power connectors, and requires a 250 W power supply. The Arc B370 has no display outputs of its own, while the RTX 3050 6 GB has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA card measures 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height.

Production status and release dates also differ. The Arc B370 is active and was released on January 26, 2026. The RTX 3050 6 GB is end-of-life, released on February 1, 2024, with the GeForce 20 series as its predecessor and GeForce 40 series as its successor. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 179 USD, while the Intel part has no recorded launch price. The bus interface differs as well: the Arc B370 uses IGP, and the RTX 3050 6 GB uses PCIe 4.0 x8.