GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A770

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000 8 GB

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,969
N/A
geekbench_opencl
109,175
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
94,284
34,561

Analysis: Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

Reviewing the test data for Intel Arc A770 GPU and NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 8 GB GPU, the trend of similar throughput develops. No graphics card wins steadily throughout most games. This swapping of advantages implies fundamental parity. Consumers have a genuine dilemma between them. Each GPUs deliver capable graphics throughput.

When performance is so close, cost and functionality grow the main variables. Examine real-time ray tracing capability, upscaling implementation, TDP, and driver stability when picking between Intel Arc A770 GPU and NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 8 GB GPU. These considerations could tip the balance. Consider comprehensively. The complete perspective is important.

Looking at a engineering viewpoint, Intel Arc A770 GPU and NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 8 GB GPU share matching hardware. Memory amount, shader processors, and interface width are nearly equivalent. The specification equality supports the close test data. Not one has a substantial hardware superiority. This comparison is balanced.

When people undecided between Intel Arc A770 GPU and NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 8 GB GPU, feel certain that either selection delivers similar gaming results. This score results supports no obvious leader. Make your choice on secondary considerations and experience strong gaming throughput in any case. Both are champions in their own regard. Select confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A770
T1000 8 GB
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
896 -78.1%
Shaders
4,096
896 -78.1%
TMUs
256
56 -78.1%
ROPs
128
32 -75.0%
SM Count
14
Execution Units
512
Clocks
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1395 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
8,192 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS (1:8)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
39.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
XMX Cores
512
Power
TDP
225 W
50 W
TDP (W)
225
50 -77.8%
Suggested PSU
550 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Turing
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU117
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 7)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
6 nm
12 nm
Transistors
21,700 million
4,700 million
Die Size
406 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
53.4M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
329 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Quadro Volta
Successor
Battlemage
Workstation Ampere
View Arc A770 Details View T1000 8 GB Details