Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc A380M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER occupy different tiers of the mobile and desktop graphics landscape, and the recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between them. The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Arc A380M, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark score in the database, leaving its performance profile defined entirely by its specifications and architectural characteristics rather than measured results. This absence of direct head-to-head benchmark data means the comparison relies on the available figures for the RTX 5070 SUPER and the architectural specifications of both parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only recorded benchmark in the database for this pairing is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which applies exclusively to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The card scores 2690 points, and the database places it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the recorded data are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with an average score of 2664, a delta of 1 percent behind, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662, also 1.1 percent behind, the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660, 1.1 percent behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645, 1.7 percent behind. These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 5070 SUPER’s measured performance is tightly clustered with these older or lower-tier parts in this specific test, despite its modern architecture and high-end specifications. The RTX 5070 SUPER leads the closest rival, the Quadro K1100M, by only 1 percent, which is a marginal advantage in this workload.

The Intel Arc A380M has zero recorded benchmark entries, so there are no scores or percentile placements to compare directly. The wins counter for the Intel part is 0, and the wins counter for the NVIDIA part is also 0, reflecting the absence of head-to-head tests. Without measured data for the Arc A380M, the database cannot quantify how it performs against the RTX 5070 SUPER in any specific workload. The RTX 5070 SUPER’s 2690 score stands as the sole numeric benchmark reference in this comparison, and it shows a part that, while positioned in the low 18th percentile globally, still outperforms its nearest recorded competitors by a narrow margin.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins in every measurable category available in the database, simply because it is the only one with recorded benchmark data. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 confirms it delivers functional performance in a DirectX 12 workload, and its percentile rank of 18 indicates it sits above 82 percent of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals, all within 1.7 percent of its score, show that the RTX 5070 SUPER edges out older professional and entry-level parts, but the margin is slim. The card also leads in raw specifications: it uses 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores, with a boost clock of 2512 MHz. Its FP32 throughput is 32.15 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is the same at 32.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating no half-precision penalty.

The Arc A380M, with no benchmark scores, cannot claim any measured win. Its specifications show a smaller design: 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 8 RT cores, and no tensor cores listed. Its boost clock is 2000 MHz, and its FP32 throughput is 4.096 TFLOPS, which is roughly 12.8 percent of the RTX 5070 SUPER’s FP32 figure. The FP16 throughput is 8.192 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it halves the rate for full precision. In terms of memory, the Arc A380M uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has more than three times the memory capacity and over 3.6 times the bandwidth, which gives it a clear advantage in memory-heavy workloads such as high-resolution textures or large data sets.

The RTX 5070 SUPER also wins on power delivery and interface. It uses a 16-pin connector and a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus, while the Arc A380M uses an MXM-A 3.1 interface, which is a mobile module standard. The RTX 5070 SUPER’s TDP is 275 W, compared to the Arc A380M’s 35 W, meaning the Intel part consumes far less power, but this is not a performance win in benchmark terms. The RTX 5070 SUPER’s pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s, while the Arc A380M’s are 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s, respectively. These numbers confirm the NVIDIA part dominates in fill-rate and texture throughput, which are critical for rasterization and post-processing effects.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the only part in this comparison with measured performance, and that measured performance, while not dominant against its nearest recorded rivals, is substantial in absolute terms. A 2690 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, which means it outperforms the majority of the database’s entries. The nearest rivals, all scoring between 2645 and 2664, are within 1.7 percent, so the RTX 5070 SUPER does not crush them, but it does lead them all. For anyone relying on benchmark scores, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the clear choice because it has a recorded result and the Arc A380M has none.

The Arc A380M is a low-power mobile part with a 35 W TDP and a 6 nm process, built for compact, portable devices. Its specifications, such as 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, are far below the RTX 5070 SUPER, but they are also far below what the RTX 5070 SUPER needs to function, given its 275 W TDP and dual-slot cooler. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop card with a 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width, while the Arc A380M is an MXM module, meaning it is designed for laptops or small-form-factor systems. The database shows no benchmark wins for either part, so the verdict rests on the single recorded score and the specification gaps. The RTX 5070 SUPER is the only part with demonstrated performance, so it is the only one that can be recommended based on measured data.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A380M have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists zero benchmark entries for the Arc A380M, so no performance score or percentile ranking is available for it.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER leads the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M by 1 percent, the GeForce GT 1030 by 1.1 percent, the Intel Arc Pro B50 by 1.1 percent, and the GeForce GT 440 by 1.7 percent, all based on average scores.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The Arc A380M uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two parts?

A: The Arc A380M has a TDP of 35 W, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W, making the Intel part substantially more power-efficient in specification terms.

Q: What are the shading unit counts for each GPU?

A: The Arc A380M has 1024 shading units, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, a 6.25 times difference in favor of the NVIDIA card.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A380M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER are built on different architectures and process nodes. The Arc A380M uses Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile, with a transistor count of 7,200 million and a die size of 157 mm², yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, with the GB205 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the GeForce 50-series, has 31,100 million transistors, and a die size of 263 mm², giving a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip has over four times the transistors and a higher density.

The clock speeds differ significantly. The Arc A380M has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz or 15.5 Gbps effective. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz or 28 Gbps effective. The memory type also differs: the Intel part uses GDDR6, while the NVIDIA part uses GDDR7. The bus widths are 96-bit and 192-bit, respectively, and the bandwidth figures are 186.0 GB/s versus 672.0 GB/s. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, while the Arc A380M has 8 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. The FP32 and FP16 throughputs also differ: the Arc A380M delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 with a 1:1 ratio.

The physical and interface specifications are also distinct. The Arc A380M is an MXM Module, using the MXM-A 3.1 bus interface, and its display outputs are portable device dependent. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, measuring 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. It has a 16-pin power connector and outputs 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Arc A380M has no listed power connector or suggested PSU, while the RTX 5070 SUPER also has no suggested PSU listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The release dates differ, with the Arc A380M released on January 23, 2023, and the RTX 5070 SUPER released on December 31, 2025, though neither has a predecessor or successor listed.