Intel Arc A380E vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Comparison

The Verdict

The data presents a stark generational and performance divide between these two workstation-oriented GPUs. The Intel Arc A380E, positioned as an end-of-life entry-level product from the Alchemist generation, holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, by contrast, sits at the 70th percentile, a substantial jump that reflects its status as an active, current-generation product. For any workload requiring significant compute throughput, the RTX PRO 2000 is the clear choice based on the recorded metrics.

The RTX PRO 2000's average benchmark score of 25,269 points dwarfs the Intel part's recorded average of zero, as the database contains no benchmark entries for the A380E. This absence of data is itself informative. The Intel card was designed for a specific, lower-power niche, while the NVIDIA card delivers over four times the FP32 compute throughput. The RTX PRO 2000 delivers 17.03 TFLOPS of FP32 performance against the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS. Its nearest rivals in the database, such as the AMD Radeon RX 6700M (average score 25,633, a 1.4% difference) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (average score 25,740, a 1.8% difference), highlight that the RTX PRO 2000 competes with much larger, higher-powered mobile parts. The Intel A380E, with its 75 W TDP and 6 GB of memory, targets basic display output and light acceleration, not the demanding compute tasks where the NVIDIA card excels.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is immense, representing two distinct design philosophies and generations. Intel's Arc A380E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, produced on a more advanced 5 nm process, also at TSMC. This process advantage contributes to the NVIDIA chip's significantly higher transistor density.

The transistor counts tell a dramatic story of design scale. The Intel chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, resulting in a density of 45.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip packs 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.0 million transistors per square millimeter. This means the NVIDIA chip holds roughly three times the transistors in a slightly larger area, enabling its far higher core counts and specialized hardware.

Core configuration differences are fundamental. The Intel A380E has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It includes 8 ray tracing cores but no dedicated tensor cores. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000, by contrast, is equipped with 4,352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It also features 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores. The inclusion of tensor cores in the NVIDIA part is a critical architectural advantage for AI-accelerated workloads, a capability entirely absent from the Intel specification. The FP16 throughput figures further illustrate this: the Intel card reaches 8.192 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA card sustains 17.03 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating a more balanced compute design.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly higher memory bandwidth at 288.0 GB/s, compared to the Intel Arc A380E's 186.0 GB/s. This is due to its larger 128-bit bus and faster GDDR7 memory.

Q: Are these two graphics cards similar in physical size?

A: No. The Intel Arc A380E is a single-slot card measuring 254 mm in length, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a dual-slot card measuring 167 mm in length. The NVIDIA card is considerably shorter despite being thicker.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has a higher TDP of 75 W, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a lower TDP of 70 W. Both cards require a suggested power supply of 250 W and do not use external power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has more memory for large datasets?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, more than double the 6 GB of GDDR6 found on the Intel Arc A380E. This larger framebuffer is better suited for large 3D models and high-resolution textures.

Q: How do the display outputs compare?

A: The Intel Arc A380E provides 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, a newer and different physical connector standard.

Q: What is the performance ranking of each GPU in the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell ranks at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,269. The Intel Arc A380E ranks at the 50th percentile, but has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every core specification. The process node is a key distinction, with Intel using a 6 nm process and NVIDIA using a 5 nm process. The transistor count is drastically different: 7,200 million for Intel versus 21,900 million for NVIDIA. Die size also varies, with the Intel die at 157 mm² and the NVIDIA die at 181 mm². The resulting transistor density is 45.9 million per mm² for Intel and 121.0 million per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds show an interesting inversion. The Intel card has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a much lower base clock of 982 MHz but boosts to 1957 MHz. Memory clocks differ too: Intel's memory runs at 15.5 Gbps effective, while NVIDIA's runs at 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Intel card has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, while the NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus. This results in bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s for Intel and 288.0 GB/s for NVIDIA. The core counts are similarly lopsided: 1,024 shading units versus 4,352, 64 TMUs versus 136, 32 ROPs versus 48, 8 ray tracing cores versus 34, and null versus 136 tensor cores.

Compute rates and physical specifications also diverge. Pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s for Intel and 93.94 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s for Intel and 266.2 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS for Intel and 17.03 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. The power draw is close, 75 W for Intel and 70 W for NVIDIA, but the slot width differs (single-slot for Intel, dual-slot for NVIDIA). The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for Intel and PCIe 5.0 x8 for NVIDIA. Physical dimensions are also different: 254 mm long for Intel versus 167 mm for NVIDIA. The production status is end-of-life for Intel and active for NVIDIA, and the release dates are years apart.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are impossible because the database contains no benchmark records for the Intel Arc A380E. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, however, has a full suite of recorded scores. Its performance in synthetic tests reveals a capable, mid-range workstation part. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 2,374.5. Its Geekbench scores are strong: 106,087 in OpenCL and 113,865 in Vulkan. These results indicate robust compute and graphics API performance.

The Passmark suite shows a more varied picture. The RTX PRO 2000 scores 20,049 in the G3D test and 8,396 in the GPU Compute test. Its DirectX 9 score is 241, DirectX 10 is 122, and DirectX 11 is 174, while the DirectX 12 score is 80. The G2D score is 1,303. These numbers suggest that the card's strengths lie in modern, compute-heavy workloads rather than legacy DirectX 9 or 10 tasks, where its scores are relatively low compared to its G3D result.

The performance context is further clarified by the RTX PRO 2000's nearest rivals in the database. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700M by 1.4%, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 by 1.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.8%. It leads the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 2%. These deltas show the RTX PRO 2000 is positioned in a competitive performance band, exchanging blows with much larger mobile GPUs. The Intel Arc A380E, with no scores, cannot be placed in this context. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder based on specifications, not measured performance.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell wins in nearly every measurable category. Its 17.03 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 266.2 GTexel/s texture rate make it suited for 3D rendering, simulation, and complex compute tasks. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for large datasets, AI inference workloads that can utilize its 136 tensor cores, and ray tracing with its 34 RT cores. The active production status ensures ongoing driver support and availability. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface also offers double the bandwidth of the Intel card's PCIe 4.0 x8 connection for data transfer from the host system.

The Intel Arc A380E wins in specific, narrow areas based on its specification sheet. Its single-slot design and shorter 254 mm length allow for installation in space-constrained chassis. Its 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs are full-sized connectors, which may be preferable in some professional setups without adapter cables. Its fixed 2000 MHz clock speed is simple and predictable. It also uses the older but widely compatible PCIe 4.0 interface. However, these advantages are primarily physical or interface-related. In raw compute, memory capacity, and feature support, the NVIDIA card dominates. The A380E's higher TDP of 75 W versus 70 W for the NVIDIA card is a minor disadvantage, and its end-of-life status means it is a legacy product. The data clearly indicates that the RTX PRO 2000 is the superior performer, while the A380E serves only the most basic display and acceleration needs.