GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

CORE STATE GA104

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1560 MHz

TDP 115 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

24,546

92,939

geekbench_vulkan

24,747

86,768

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

2,380

passmark_directx_10

N/A

113

passmark_directx_11

N/A

138

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

160

passmark_g2d

N/A

641

passmark_g3d

N/A

15,309

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

6,827

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Rendering performance comparisons between RTX 3070 (NVIDIA) and Arc A350M reveal a clear winner. RTX 3070 (NVIDIA) provides notably superior benchmark scores throughout contemporary titles. The memory advantage and architectural upgrades translate into clearly smoother visual quality. Performance figures confirms this observation. Players demanding premium visuals will consider this.

When it comes to RT, RTX 3070 (NVIDIA) pulls significantly beyond of Arc A350M. Its specialized accelerators execute heavy lighting rendering considerably more effectively. Users looking for premium graphics would definitely choose RTX 3070 (NVIDIA). This RT advantage is notable. Next-gen games more and more take advantage of ray tracing capabilities.

When it comes to RT, RTX 3070 (NVIDIA) pulls further in front of Arc A350M. The hardware accelerators manage heavy lighting calculations significantly more capably. Gamers wanting premium graphics would definitely consider RTX 3070 (NVIDIA). This hardware RT performance is significant. Current releases progressively utilize RT features.

To summarize, RTX 3070 (NVIDIA) delivers the more capable selection in this analysis. The frame rate advantages support evaluation for users constructing a capable gaming PC. Although Arc A350M possesses its advantages, the test numbers obviously favors RTX 3070 (NVIDIA). Reach your conclusion with this in mind. This benchmark margin is significant enough to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A350M

RTX 3070 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

5,120 +566.7%

Shaders

768

5,120 +566.7%

TMUs

160 +233.3%

ROPs

80 +233.3%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1150 MHz

1110 MHz

Boost Clock

2200 MHz

1560 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

8,192 +100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

448.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

52.80 GPixel/s

124.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

105.6 GTexel/s

249.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

3.379 TFLOPS

15.97 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)

249.6 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)

15.97 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

40 +566.7%

Tensor Cores

—

160

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

25 W

115 W

TDP (W)

115 +360.0%

Power Connectors

—

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA104

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

GeForce 30 Mobile

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

17,400 million

Die Size

157 mm²

392 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

44.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

—

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

GeForce 20 Mobile

View Arc A350M Details View GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile Details