Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc A310 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. The database shows zero wins for either product in direct comparison tests. However, the average benchmark scores from their respective test suites illustrate the scale of the performance gap. The Intel Arc A310 averages 7,550 points across its benchmark set, while the NVIDIA card averages 6,270 points in its single recorded test, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 workload.

The Arc A310's individual results are spread across several legacy and compute workloads. Its Passmark G3D score of 5,433 is the strongest traditional graphics result, while its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 69 is the weakest. The compute-oriented Geekbench OpenCL result of 30,607 and Vulkan result of 28,964 show a different side of the chip, one that is far stronger in abstract compute tasks than in rasterization tests. The Passmark GPU compute score of 2,157 reinforces this pattern.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, by contrast, has only one benchmark entry: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5. That single result places it at the 36th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Arc A310 sits at the 40th percentile. These percentile figures are close, but they are not directly comparable because they are drawn from different test populations and workloads.

The nearest rival data for the Arc A310 shows how tightly it clusters around comparable products. The AMD Radeon R7 250 averages 7,557 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 averages 7,580 (0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 averages 7,472 (1.0% behind), and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M averages 7,447 (1.4% behind). These deltas are all within 1.5%, indicating that the Arc A310 sits in a very dense performance band where small variations separate adjacent products.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's nearest rivals tell a similar story of tight clustering, despite the much higher absolute performance class. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches its average score exactly (0.0% delta), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 trails by 0.2%, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% behind, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9%. The narrow deltas again suggest that this benchmark result is not an outlier but a stable measurement within a competitive tier.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Arc A310 uses the DG2-128 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, implementing the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the AD102 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, implementing Ada Lovelace from the GeForce 40 series.

Transistor counts reveal the scale disparity. The Intel chip packs 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The NVIDIA chip contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a density of 125.3 million per mm². The NVIDIA part is more than ten times larger in transistor count and roughly four times larger in die area, with nearly triple the transistor density.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, producing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s. That is a 5.4x bandwidth advantage for the NVIDIA card, which is critical for modern workloads at high resolutions and with large textures.

Compute resources scale accordingly. The Arc A310 has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster operation units, and 6 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card has 8,448 shading units (11x), 264 TMUs (8.25x), 96 ROPs (6x), and 66 RT cores (11x). The NVIDIA part also includes 264 tensor cores, a feature absent from the Intel specification.

Clock behavior differs as well. The Arc A310 runs at a fixed 1,750 MHz for both base and boost, with memory at 1,937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a 2,340 MHz base clock and 2,610 MHz boost, with memory at 1,313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card boosts 49% higher than the Intel card's fixed clock.

Rates and throughput numbers follow the same pattern. The Arc A310 achieves 28.00 GPixel/s pixel fill and 56.00 GTexel/s texture fill, with 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The NVIDIA card reaches 250.6 GPixel/s (9x), 689.0 GTexel/s (12.3x), 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 (16.4x), and 44.10 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications reinforce the positioning. The Arc A310 is a 30 W single-slot card with no power connectors and a 200 W suggested PSU, using PCIe 4.0 x8. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a 285 W triple-slot card with a 16-pin connector, a 600 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA card measures 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide, whereas the Arc A310 has no recorded dimensions.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the Arc A310 provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections, while the NVIDIA card offers one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Arc A310 was released on 2022-10-11, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 on 2024-06-09. Both are end-of-life products, with the Intel card succeeding Xe Graphics and preceding Battlemage, and the NVIDIA card succeeding GeForce 30 and preceding GeForce 50.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A310 wins in scenarios defined by low power envelopes and compact physical profiles. Its 30 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it suitable for small form factor systems or secondary display duties. The four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups with modern connection standards. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, and the 200 W suggested PSU means it can run in systems with modest power supplies.

The Arc A310's benchmark pattern suggests relative strength in compute-oriented APIs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 30,607 and Vulkan score of 28,964 are far higher than its Passmark results, indicating that the architecture performs better in abstract compute workloads than in legacy DirectX rasterization tests. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 69 and DirectX 10 score of 31 are particularly weak, suggesting poor optimization for older graphics APIs. The DirectX 11 score of 33 and DirectX 12 score of 29 are similarly low.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins in scenarios demanding maximum throughput. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance, 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 96 ROPs position it for high-resolution gaming, ray tracing, and compute-heavy professional workloads. The 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features that the Arc A310 lacks entirely. The 16 GB VRAM supports large datasets and modern game assets, while the 256-bit bus delivers the bandwidth those assets require.

The single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, though the lack of additional benchmark data limits broader conclusions. The 36th percentile placement suggests it outperforms most GPUs in the database, despite the modest absolute score in that particular test.

FAQ

Q: How does the Arc A310's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A310 averages 7,550 points. The AMD Radeon R7 250 is 0.1% ahead at 7,557, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 0.4% ahead at 7,580, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is 1.0% behind at 7,472, and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M is 1.4% behind at 7,447.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's nearest rival performance delta?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches its average score of 6,270 exactly (0.0% delta). The NVIDIA Quadro K620 trails by 0.2%, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% behind, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9%.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 672.3 GB/s over a 256-bit bus, compared to the Arc A310's 124.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Arc A310 has a 30 W TDP and a 200 W suggested PSU with no power connectors. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a 285 W TDP and a 600 W suggested PSU with one 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 8,448 shading units, while the Arc A310 has 768.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of purpose. The Intel Arc A310 is a low-power, compact GPU for systems where physical space and electrical draw are primary constraints. Its 30 W TDP, single-slot profile, and absence of power connectors make it appropriate for small builds, while its four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor configurations. Its benchmark results cluster tightly with older and lower-tier products, and its percentile rank of 40 places it in the middle of the database.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a high-throughput GPU for workloads that demand maximum compute and memory performance. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32, 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, and 16 GB VRAM place it in a different performance class entirely, despite its 36th percentile rank in the database being lower than the Arc A310's. The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA card is 799 USD.

A buyer choosing between these two should base the decision on the intended workload and system constraints. If the requirement is minimal power draw, small physical footprint, and basic display output, the Arc A310 is the appropriate choice. If the requirement is high-end gaming, ray tracing, AI acceleration, or professional rendering, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the only option with the necessary resources. The gap in shading units (11x), FP32 throughput (16.4x), and memory bandwidth (5.4x) is too large for the Arc A310 to bridge, regardless of its compute-oriented benchmark strengths.