AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs NVIDIA T400 Comparison

The NVIDIA T400 is a low-profile workstation card built on Turing, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a modern mainstream GPU using RDNA 4.0. The benchmark data shows a total mismatch in raw performance, with the RX 9060 delivering scores that are multiple times higher across the board. However, the T400’s role is not about sheer throughput; it is about a minimal power envelope and a specific niche in legacy or low-power systems. The following analysis breaks down the architectural chasm, the specification differences, and the benchmark results to determine which card is appropriate for which workload.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA T400 has a higher average benchmark score of 16508 compared to the AMD Radeon RX 9060’s 16014. This is surprising given the RX 9060’s massive lead in individual tests, but the T400’s percentile rank is 60 versus the RX 9060’s 59.

Q: Is the RX 9060 faster in both common compute and graphics API tests?

A: Yes. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 9060 scores 88183 versus the T400’s 17039, a delta of -80.7% in favor of the AMD card. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RX 9060 scores 39476 versus 15976, a delta of -59.5% in favor of the AMD card.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each card according to the data?

A: The T400’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, with a delta of 0%. The RX 9060’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is 0.7% faster than it.

Q: Does the T400 support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The T400’s specifications list no RT cores, while the RX 9060 includes 28 RT cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RX 9060 has 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is 3.6 times higher than the T400’s 80.00 GB/s. The RX 9060 also has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory versus the T400’s 2 GB.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The RX 9060 has a transistor density of 149.2M / mm² on a 4 nm node, while the T400 has 23.5M / mm² on a 12 nm node. The RX 9060 packs 29,700 million transistors into a 199 mm² die.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is generational. The NVIDIA T400 is built on the Turing architecture using TU117 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process by TSMC. It is a modest chip with 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 23.5M / mm². The T400’s design is focused on efficiency and minimal power draw, with a base clock of 420 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz. It lacks specialized hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations, as both RT cores and tensor cores are listed as null. The FP32 performance is 1,094.4 GFLOPS, and FP16 is 2.189 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, codenamed "Strix Point". It is manufactured on a 4 nm process, also by TSMC, but packs 29,700 million transistors into a slightly smaller 199 mm² die. This results in a density of 149.2M / mm², which is over six times higher than the T400. The RX 9060 has a much higher base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz. It includes 28 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, a feature entirely absent on the T400. The FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 21.43 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating full-rate FP16 execution.

The memory subsystem is a major divergence. The T400 uses a 64-bit bus with 2 GB of GDDR6, achieving 80.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 9060 uses a 128-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6, achieving 288.0 GB/s. This quadruple increase in memory capacity and 3.6x increase in bandwidth is critical for modern game textures and compute workloads. The T400 supports PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, offering much higher bandwidth to the host system. The API support also differs: the T400 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RX 9060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct purposes. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the clear winner for any workload requiring substantial compute, modern graphics features, or large memory pools. Its benchmark scores are over five times higher in OpenCL and nearly two and a half times higher in Vulkan. The 8 GB memory buffer and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for contemporary gaming at high settings. The presence of 28 RT cores means it can handle ray-traced effects, something the T400 cannot do at all.

The NVIDIA T400, conversely, is a legacy or low-power solution. With a TDP of 30 W and no power connectors, it is designed for systems with severe power constraints. Its single-slot form factor and three mini-DisplayPort outputs suggest a use case in multi-display setups for productivity or signage, where 3D performance is secondary. The T400’s 2 GB memory is insufficient for modern games, and its lack of RT cores disqualifies it from any ray-traced workload. The verdict is straightforward: if the task involves gaming, rendering, or GPU compute, the RX 9060 is the only choice. If the task is basic display output in a low-power embedded or enterprise environment, the T400 might suffice, but its performance is a fraction of the RX 9060.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The T400 has 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, while the RX 9060 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. This is a 4.7x increase in shading units and a 4x increase in ROPs, which directly impacts pixel fill rate. The T400’s pixel rate is 22.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 34.20 GTexel/s. The RX 9060’s pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, representing an 8.4x and 9.8x advantage, respectively.

The clock speeds are also drastically different. The T400 idles at a 420 MHz base clock, which is lower than most CPUs. The RX 9060 has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost of 2990 MHz, a 2.1x increase over the T400’s boost. Memory clocks are also higher on the RX 9060: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the T400’s 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective). Power consumption is a major differentiator: the T400 draws 30 W, while the RX 9060 draws 132 W. The T400 has no power connectors, while the RX 9060 requires a single 8-pin connector. The suggested PSU for the T400 is 200 W, while the RX 9060 suggests 300 W.

The bus interface is another difference: the T400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the T400 has 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, while the RX 9060 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The T400 is a single-slot card, while the RX 9060 is dual-slot. Finally, the production status shows the T400 is end-of-life, released in May 2021, while the RX 9060 is active, released in August 2025.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data contains only two tests, both of which are decisive wins for the AMD Radeon RX 9060. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 9060 scores 88183, while the T400 scores 17039. This is a delta of -80.7% from the perspective of the T400, meaning the RX 9060 is roughly 5.2 times faster. This test is a strong indicator of general-purpose compute performance, and the gap is massive. The RX 9060’s 1792 shading units and high clock speeds dominate the T400’s 384 units.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the RX 9060 scores 39476, while the T400 scores 15976. The delta is -59.5%, meaning the RX 9060 is about 2.5 times faster. This narrower gap in Vulkan compared to OpenCL suggests that the T400’s architecture is less penalized in a graphics API context, but it still loses by a wide margin. The T400’s score of 15976 is respectable for a 30 W card, but it is not competitive against the RX 9060’s modern RDNA 4.0 design. The wins are counted as 0 for the T400 and 2 for the RX 9060, confirming a clean sweep.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon RX 9060 Wins: The RX 9060 wins every benchmark where the two are compared. Its OpenCL score of 88183 is over five times the T400’s 17039, making it the obvious choice for compute workloads like rendering, machine learning inference, and video encoding. The Vulkan score of 39476 versus 15976 further cements its lead in gaming and graphics APIs. With 8 GB of memory, it can handle modern game textures that would overflow the T400’s 2 GB buffer. The 28 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, which is entirely absent on the T400. The 191.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 334.9 GTexel/s texture rate mean it can push high resolutions and high refresh rates without bottlenecking.

NVIDIA T400 Wins: The T400 has no benchmark wins in the head-to-head data. However, its specification highlights a different kind of victory: power efficiency. With a TDP of 30 W, the T400 uses less than a quarter of the RX 9060’s 132 W. It requires no external power connectors and only suggests a 200 W PSU, making it viable in systems with minimal power delivery. Its single-slot form factor is also an advantage in dense server or workstation builds where space is at a premium. The T400’s 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs could drive multiple displays in a low-power environment, whereas the RX 9060’s dual-slot design and higher power draw are less suited for such constrained cases. Ultimately, the T400’s only practical win is in scenarios where the RX 9060 cannot physically fit or be powered, not in performance.