GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2990 MHz
TDP 132 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc Pro A30M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,322
N/A
geekbench_opencl
88,725
31,894
geekbench_vulkan
39,586
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

Reviewing the test figures for the Intel Intel Arc Pro A30M and RX 9060 by AMD, a pattern of matched capability emerges. No graphics card wins reliably over all benchmarks. The back-and-forth of victories indicates fundamental parity. Consumers encounter a actual selection between them. Both GPUs achieve competent rendering throughput.

Based on a hardware standpoint, the Intel Intel Arc Pro A30M and RX 9060 by AMD have matching specifications. Memory capacity, shader processors, and bus width are closely comparable. This specification equivalence explains the matched performance data. No has a considerable technical lead. This matchup is even.

When performance is remarkably comparable, price and functionality grow the primary elements. Examine real-time ray tracing support, AI upscaling technology, power consumption, and ecosystem maturity when selecting between the Intel Intel Arc Pro A30M and RX 9060 by AMD. These elements could affect the decision. Consider comprehensively. This bigger view matters.

To summarize, this comparison between the Intel Intel Arc Pro A30M and RX 9060 by AMD ends in a virtual deadlock. Performance gaps are minimal and doubtful to impact real-world experience. Focus your decision on availability, driver choices, and specific feature needs. The two are strong selections. The parity is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060
Pro A30M
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
1,024 -42.9%
Shaders
1,792
1,024 -42.9%
TMUs
112
64 -42.9%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
28
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2990 MHz
2000 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
191.4 GPixel/s
64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
334.9 GTexel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.43 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
669.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
1,024.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
42.86 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.192 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
8 -71.4%
XMX Cores
128
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
132 W
50 W
TDP (W)
132
50 -62.1%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 44
DG2-128
Codename
Strix Point
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Alchemist (Pro-Series Mobile)
Process Size
4 nm
6 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
7,200 million
Die Size
199 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
149.2M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 9060 Details View Arc Pro A30M Details