GPU Comparison
RADEON
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
CORE STATE
Navi 31
VRAM
20 GB
CLOCK SPEED
2394 MHz
TDP
300 W
BUS WIDTH
320 bit
ARCHITECTURE
RDNA 3.0
PROCESS
5 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2022
VS
GEFORCE
CMP 90HX
CORE STATE
GA102
VRAM
10 GB
CLOCK SPEED
1710 MHz
TDP
320 W
BUS WIDTH
320 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Ampere
PROCESS
8 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2021
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
geekbench_opencl
geekbench_vulkan
passmark_directx_10
passmark_directx_11
passmark_directx_12
passmark_directx_9
passmark_g2d
passmark_g3d
passmark_gpu_compute
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX
This graphics card analysis between AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 90HX graphics shows remarkably competitive performance. The two cards exchange blows throughout diverse tests, with none securing a decisive superiority. This performance numbers demonstrates this assessment. None of the GPU excels steadily. Those face a true selection here.
The bottom line: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 90HX graphics are tightly competitive. Neither warrants a undisputed recommendation over the alternative. Let availability and ecosystem preferences shape your final determination. Either cards can meet you adequately. This is a solid scenario.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
RX 7900 XT
CMP 90HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,376
6,400
+19.0%
Shaders
5,376
6,400
+19.0%
TMUs
336
200
-40.5%
ROPs
192
80
-58.3%
Compute Units
84
—
SM Count
—
50
Clocks
Base Clock
1387 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2394 MHz
1710 MHz
Game Clock
2025 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2025 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
20 Gbps effective
1188 MHz
19 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
20 GB
10 GB
VRAM (MB)
20,480
10,240
-50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
320 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
800.0 GB/s
760.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
5 MB
L3 Cache
80 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
459.6 GPixel/s
136.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
804.4 GTexel/s
342.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
51.48 TFLOPS
21.89 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.609 TFLOPS (1:32)
342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
103.0 TFLOPS (2:1)
21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
84
50
-40.5%
Tensor Cores
—
200
Matrix Cores
168
—
Power
TDP
300 W
320 W
TDP (W)
300
320
+6.7%
Suggested PSU
700 W
700 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 31
GA102
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Navi III
(RX 7000)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
28,300 million
Die Size
529 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
109.1M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
276 mm
10.9 inches
285 mm
11.2 inches
Height
110 mm
4.3 inches
112 mm
4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Launch Price
899 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
—
Successor
Navi IV
—