AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2245 MHz
TDP 260 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

TITAN RTX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1770 MHz
TDP 280 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
4,814
3,794
geekbench_opencl
175,758
144,858
geekbench_vulkan
99,850
136,073
passmark_directx_10
139
147
passmark_directx_11
300
189
passmark_directx_12
107
88
passmark_directx_9
310
223
passmark_g2d
1,180
860
passmark_g3d
27,089
20,491
passmark_gpu_compute
15,016
10,034

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture: the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE wins 8 of 10 head-to-head benchmarks against the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, with an average benchmark score of 32,456 versus 31,676. The AMD card sits at the 77th percentile of all GPUs, one point above the TITAN RTX’s 76th percentile. In raw performance terms, the RX 7900 GRE is the faster card in most workloads, particularly in DirectX 11, DirectX 9, and compute-heavy tasks. However, the TITAN RTX holds one significant advantage: it wins the Vulkan benchmark by 26.6%, which suggests NVIDIA’s architecture retains a lead in that specific API.

For a buyer choosing strictly from this data, the RX 7900 GRE is the pick for anyone prioritizing modern gaming performance, DirectX 12, or general compute throughput. The TITAN RTX, despite being end-of-life, remains relevant only for users who specifically need Vulkan performance or require 24 GB of memory (a capacity the AMD card cannot match). The RX 7900 GRE is also the more sensible choice for longevity: it is still in active production, whereas the TITAN RTX is discontinued. The AMD card’s launch MSRP is 549 USD, while the TITAN RTX launched at 2,499 USD — though pricing considerations are noted, the performance gap does not justify that difference for most workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from fundamentally different design generations. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses the Navi 31 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 57,700 million transistors into a 529 mm² die. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX uses the TU102 chip on a 12 nm process, also at TSMC, with 18,600 million transistors on a larger 754 mm² die. The transistor density difference is stark: the AMD chip achieves 109.1M transistors per mm², versus 24.7M for NVIDIA. This explains why the RX 7900 GRE can deliver higher performance while consuming less power — its TDP is 260 W versus 280 W for the TITAN RTX.

The RX 7900 GRE is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito, from the Navi III generation. The TITAN RTX uses Turing architecture from the GeForce 20 generation. AMD’s card has 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 160 ROPs, while NVIDIA’s card has 4,608 shading units, 288 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The AMD card also has 80 ray tracing cores, compared to 72 for NVIDIA. Notably, the TITAN RTX has 576 tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks entirely — a feature that could matter for AI workloads, though the benchmark data does not directly test tensor performance.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The TITAN RTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. Despite the TITAN RTX’s higher raw bandwidth, the AMD card achieves higher effective throughput in practice, as benchmark scores show. The RX 7900 GRE also supports PCIe 4.0 x16, while the TITAN RTX is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16 — a generational interface advantage for AMD.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster overall?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE wins 8 of 10 head-to-head benchmarks, with an average score of 32,456 versus 31,676 for the NVIDIA TITAN RTX. The AMD card also holds a higher percentile ranking at 77 versus 76.

Q: Does the TITAN RTX win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, the TITAN RTX wins two benchmarks: the Geekbench Vulkan test (136,073 vs 99,850, a 26.6% advantage) and the Passmark DirectX 10 test (147 vs 139, a 5.4% advantage).

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The AMD card has a lower TDP at 260 W versus 280 W for the NVIDIA card, despite delivering higher performance in most benchmarks. The RX 7900 GRE also uses a more advanced 5 nm process versus 12 nm for the TITAN RTX.

Q: Is the TITAN RTX still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA TITAN RTX is end-of-life. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is still in active production.

Q: Which card has better DirectX 12 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE wins the Passmark DirectX 12 test (107 vs 88, a 21.6% advantage) and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test (4,814 vs 3,794, a 26.9% advantage).

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every major specification. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses a 5 nm process, while the NVIDIA TITAN RTX uses 12 nm. Transistor count is 57,700 million for AMD versus 18,600 million for NVIDIA. Die size is 529 mm² for AMD versus 754 mm² for NVIDIA. The AMD card has a base clock of 1287 MHz and boost of 2245 MHz, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1350 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost. The AMD card also has a game clock of 1880 MHz, which the NVIDIA card lacks.

Memory differs: 16 GB vs 24 GB capacity, 256-bit vs 384-bit bus width, and 576.0 GB/s vs 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card has 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 160 ROPs, versus 4,608 shading units, 288 TMUs, and 96 ROPs for NVIDIA. Ray tracing cores are 80 for AMD versus 72 for NVIDIA. The NVIDIA card has 576 tensor cores; the AMD card has none. Pixel rate is 359.2 GPixel/s for AMD versus 169.9 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 718.4 GTexel/s versus 509.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 45.98 TFLOPS for AMD versus 16.31 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 91.96 TFLOPS versus 32.62 TFLOPS.

Power draw and physical dimensions also differ: TDP is 260 W for AMD versus 280 W for NVIDIA. The AMD card is 276 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 51 mm wide, while the NVIDIA card is 267 mm long, 116 mm tall, and 35 mm wide. Both are dual-slot with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16; the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs differ: AMD offers 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, while NVIDIA offers 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest win for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE comes in the Passmark DirectX 11 test, where it scores 300 versus 189 for the TITAN RTX — a 58.7% advantage. This is followed by the Passmark GPU Compute test, where AMD scores 15,016 versus 10,034, a 49.7% lead. The Passmark DirectX 9 test shows a 39% advantage (310 vs 223). The Passmark G2D test favors AMD by 37.2% (1,180 vs 860). In the Passmark G3D test, AMD leads by 32.2% (27,089 vs 20,491). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows AMD ahead by 26.9% (4,814 vs 3,794). The Geekbench OpenCL test gives AMD a 21.3% edge (175,758 vs 144,858). Finally, the Passmark DirectX 12 test shows AMD ahead by 21.6% (107 vs 88).

The NVIDIA TITAN RTX wins two benchmarks. The Geekbench Vulkan test is its strongest showing, scoring 136,073 versus 99,850 for AMD — a 26.6% advantage. The Passmark DirectX 10 test is a narrow win for NVIDIA at 147 versus 139, a 5.4% margin. These two wins demonstrate that the TITAN RTX retains specific API-level strengths, particularly in Vulkan, but they are isolated victories against a broader trend of AMD dominance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the clear winner for DirectX-based workloads. It wins every DirectX test in the benchmark suite: DirectX 9 by 39%, DirectX 11 by 58.7%, and DirectX 12 by 21.6%. It also dominates compute tasks, with a 49.7% lead in GPU compute and a 21.3% lead in OpenCL. For modern gaming, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result shows AMD ahead by 26.9%, which suggests the RX 7900 GRE is better suited for current AAA titles. The AMD card also wins the Passmark G3D test by 32.2%, reinforcing its overall gaming superiority. Additionally, the RX 7900 GRE is the only card still in production, and its 5 nm process gives it a power efficiency advantage — 260 W TDP versus 280 W — while delivering higher performance.

The NVIDIA TITAN RTX wins in two specific areas. First, Vulkan performance: the Geekbench Vulkan score of 136,073 is 26.6% higher than AMD’s 99,850, indicating that Vulkan-based games or applications may favor the NVIDIA card. Second, the DirectX 10 test shows a modest 5.4% advantage, though this is a legacy API with limited modern relevance. The TITAN RTX also offers 24 GB of memory versus 16 GB, which could be decisive for memory-bound workloads like large datasets or high-resolution textures, though the benchmark data does not directly test this. For users who prioritize Vulkan titles or need maximum memory capacity, the TITAN RTX remains a viable option despite its age. For everyone else, the RX 7900 GRE is the data-backed choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7900 GRE
TITAN RTX
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,120
4,608 -10.0%
Shaders
5,120
4,608 -10.0%
TMUs
320
288 -10.0%
ROPs
160
96 -40.0%
Compute Units
80
SM Count
72
Clocks
Base Clock
1287 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
1770 MHz
Game Clock
1880 MHz
Shader Clock
1880 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
24,576 +50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
169.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
45.98 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,436.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
509.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
91.96 TFLOPS (2:1)
32.62 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
80
72 -10.0%
Tensor Cores
576
Matrix Cores
160
Power
TDP
260 W
280 W
TDP (W)
260
280 +7.7%
Suggested PSU
600 W
600 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 31
TU102
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
GeForce 20
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
18,600 million
Die Size
529 mm²
754 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
24.7M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
276 mm 10.9 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.03x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
2,499 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
GeForce 10
Successor
Navi IV
GeForce 30
View Radeon RX 7900 GRE Details View TITAN RTX Details