AMD Radeon RX 7700S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7700S

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 7700S occupy different corners of the GPU market, one a desktop add-in card and the other a mobile integrated graphics processor. The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap across all shared benchmarks, with the RTX 4070 SUPER winning every head-to-head test by wide margins. The RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the RX 7700S ranks at the 78th percentile, a gap that widens significantly in raw scores. The average benchmark score for the RTX 4070 SUPER is 43,223, compared to 33,849 for the RX 7700S, a difference of roughly 28%. These are not direct competitors in the traditional sense, but comparing them reveals how far apart desktop and mobile GPU tiers have become.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER wins every recorded benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4,627 against the RX 7700S's 2,185, a 111.8% advantage. In Geekbench OpenCL, the margin stretches to 174.4% with scores of 172,795 versus 62,983. The largest single win comes in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 4070 SUPER posts 205,624 against 36,380, a staggering 465.2% lead. There is no test in the database where the RX 7700S takes the lead, so the use-case split is straightforward: the RTX 4070 SUPER is the choice for any workload that stresses DX12, OpenCL, or Vulkan performance.

The RX 7700S does have one contextual advantage: its power envelope. With a TDP of 100 W, it is designed for portable devices, whereas the RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220 W and requires a dual-slot cooler with a 16-pin connector. The RX 7700S is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The RTX 4070 SUPER, by contrast, is a 267 mm dual-slot card meant for full desktop builds. If the workload is mobile gaming or portable content creation, the RX 7700S is the only one of the two that fits physically. But from a pure performance standpoint, the RTX 4070 SUPER dominates every measured metric.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip based on Ada Lovelace, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The RX 7700S uses the Navi 33 chip based on RDNA 3.0, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4070 SUPER has nearly 2.7 times the transistor count and a 47% larger die, explaining much of its performance advantage.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7700S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s. That is a 75% bandwidth advantage for the NVIDIA card. Clock speeds are closer: the RTX 4070 SUPER boosts to 2475 MHz from a 1980 MHz base, while the RX 7700S boosts to 2500 MHz from a 1500 MHz base. The AMD card actually has a higher boost clock, but the NVIDIA card's larger shader array and memory subsystem more than compensate.

Compute resources are lopsided. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores. The RX 7700S has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 RT cores and no tensor core equivalent. FP32 throughput stands at 35.48 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 SUPER versus 20.48 TFLOPS for the RX 7700S. Interestingly, the RX 7700S achieves 40.96 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 4070 SUPER matches its FP32 rate at 35.48 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The RX 7700S offers higher peak FP16 in theory, but the RTX 4070 SUPER's unified shader design handles FP16 and FP32 at the same rate, which is often more practical.

The RTX 4070 SUPER is a PCIe 4.0 x16 desktop card with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RX 7700S is also PCIe 4.0 x16 but has portable-device-dependent display outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the RX 7700S has no listed launch MSRP. The RTX 4070 SUPER is end-of-life as a production product, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor; the RX 7700S remains active in production.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms the RX 7700S in every recorded benchmark, with deltas ranging from 111.8% to 465.2%. The RTX 4070 SUPER is the correct choice for any desktop user who needs maximum DX12, OpenCL, or Vulkan performance. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 43,223 place it well above the RX 7700S's 78th percentile and 33,849 average. The RTX 4070 SUPER also offers more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB), higher bandwidth (504.2 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s), and nearly 3.5 times the FP32 throughput. For gaming at high resolutions, content creation, or compute workloads, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the superior part.

The RX 7700S is not without merit, but its advantages are entirely in form factor and power efficiency. At 100 W with no external power connectors and IGP packaging, it fits into laptops where the 220 W, dual-slot RTX 4070 SUPER cannot go. If the requirement is a portable system with reasonable RDNA 3.0 graphics, the RX 7700S is the only viable option of the two. Its boost clock of 2500 MHz is actually higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 2475 MHz, and its FP16 throughput of 40.96 TFLOPS exceeds the NVIDIA card's 35.48 TFLOPS. But those are narrow wins in a field where the RTX 4070 SUPER dominates every benchmark. Users who need desktop-class performance should choose the RTX 4070 SUPER; users who need a mobile GPU should choose the RX 7700S, knowing it trades away the majority of compute performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43,223, compared to 33,849 for the RX 7700S, a difference of about 28% in favor of the NVIDIA card.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 SUPER in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4,627 versus 2,185 for the RX 7700S, a 111.8% lead.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, while the RX 7700S has 8 GB of GDDR6. The RTX 4070 SUPER also has a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, giving it 504.2 GB/s bandwidth compared to 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The RX 7700S has a boost clock of 2500 MHz, slightly higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 2475 MHz. However, the RTX 4070 SUPER has a much higher base clock at 1980 MHz versus 1500 MHz.

Q: Can the RX 7700S be used in a desktop PC?

A: The RX 7700S is an IGP with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs, so it is designed for laptops. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot desktop card with HDMI and DisplayPort outputs.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: Both GPUs support ray tracing. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 56 RT cores, while the RX 7700S has 32 RT cores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are one-sided, but the magnitude of each win tells a different story. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4,627 against 2,185 for the RX 7700S. That 2,442-point gap represents a 111.8% improvement, meaning the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers more than double the DX12 performance. This is the closest of the three head-to-head tests, which suggests that the RX 7700S is least disadvantaged in modern DirectX workloads, though still far behind.

Geekbench OpenCL shows a wider split. The RTX 4070 SUPER posts 172,795, while the RX 7700S manages 62,983. The delta of 174.4% means the NVIDIA card is roughly 2.7 times faster in OpenCL compute. This test stresses general-purpose GPU compute, and the RTX 4070 SUPER's 7,168 shading units and 224 tensor cores clearly pull ahead of the RX 7700S's 2,048 shading units and 32 RT cores. The lack of tensor cores on the AMD side may contribute to the gap in workloads that leverage them.

The most extreme result comes in Geekbench Vulkan. The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 205,624, compared to 36,380 for the RX 7700S, a delta of 465.2%. That is more than 5.6 times the Vulkan performance of the AMD card. Such a large disparity in a low-level graphics API suggests driver optimization and architecture efficiency play a significant role, not just raw hardware specs. The Ada Lovelace architecture appears to be exceptionally well-suited to Vulkan workloads, at least in this data.

Beyond the head-to-head tests, the RTX 4070 SUPER has additional benchmark records in the database that the RX 7700S does not share. The RTX 4070 SUPER posts Passmark scores of 29,995 in G3D, 17,108 in GPU Compute, and 1,184 in G2D, along with DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores of 344, 167, 273, and 110 respectively. The RX 7700S has no recorded Passmark results, so those tests cannot be compared directly. The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile at -1% delta, the Quadro M6000 at -0.2%, and the RTX 5050 Mobile at -0.1%, placing it in solid company. The RX 7700S's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7950 at -0.3%, the RX 480 at -0.4%, the GTX 1060 5 GB at +0.5%, and the RTX A5000 at +0.7%, a much older and slower peer group. These rival deltas confirm that the RTX 4070 SUPER competes with high-end mobile and workstation parts, while the RX 7700S sits alongside mid-range GPUs from several generations ago.