AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7700

CORE STATE Navi 32
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2459 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

CORE STATE GK104
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 980 MHz
TDP 150 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Kepler
nm
PROCESS 28 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2012

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,865
N/A
geekbench_opencl
106,028
15,113
passmark_directx_10
92
N/A
passmark_directx_11
186
N/A
passmark_directx_12
96
N/A
passmark_directx_9
261
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,206
N/A
passmark_g3d
20,974
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
10,963
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
15,012

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti represent two distinct eras of GPU design, separated by over a decade of architectural evolution. The data shows a single direct benchmark comparison, with the RX 7700 delivering a decisive victory, yet the GTX 660 Ti holds a surprisingly close aggregate standing relative to its own contemporaries. This analysis breaks down the specific benchmark results, architectural chasm, and specification differences that define this matchup.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data presents a clear, singular outcome: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins the only direct head-to-head test available, the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark. In that test, the RX 7700 scores 106,028 points, against the GTX 660 Ti’s 15,113 points. This translates to a 601.6% delta in favor of the AMD card, meaning it delivers roughly seven times the raw compute performance in that specific workload. The GTX 660 Ti has no benchmark wins in this comparison, with a 0 in the wins column.

However, the use-case split is not solely about the head-to-head. The RX 7700 also possesses a broader benchmark suite, with results across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12, as well as Passmark G2D, G3D, and GPU Compute tests. Its Passmark G3D score of 20,974 and GPU Compute score of 10,963 indicate strong general-purpose and gaming performance. The GTX 660 Ti, by contrast, only has Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores available, with its Vulkan score at 15,012. This suggests the RX 7700 is designed for modern, multi-API workloads, while the GTX 660 Ti’s data reflects a legacy focus on older DirectX titles. For any modern application leveraging OpenCL or Vulkan, the RX 7700 is the definitive winner; for legacy DirectX 9/10 scenarios, the RX 7700’s Passmark scores (261 and 92, respectively) show it can still handle those APIs, albeit with lower relative scores than its modern API results.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a higher average benchmark score of 15,852, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti’s 15,063. This places the RX 7700 in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, while the GTX 660 Ti sits in the 57th percentile.

Q: How much faster is the RX 7700 in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The RX 7700 scores 106,028 points, which is 601.6% higher than the GTX 660 Ti’s 15,113 points in the same test. This represents the only direct head-to-head benchmark available in the data.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the RX 7700 based on average score?

A: The nearest rivals to the RX 7700 are the AMD Radeon R9 370X (average score 15,862, delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (average score 16,014, delta -1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (average score 15,679, delta 1.1%). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is also close, with an average score of 16,129 and a delta of -1.7%.

Q: Does the GTX 660 Ti support Vulkan?

A: Yes, the GTX 660 Ti supports Vulkan version 1.2.175, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 15,012. However, this is significantly lower than the RX 7700’s OpenCL score, though no direct Vulkan comparison exists between the two cards.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor count?

A: The RX 7700 has a substantially higher transistor count of 28,100 million, compared to the GTX 660 Ti’s 3,540 million. The RX 7700 also uses a much denser 5 nm process, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M / mm², versus the GTX 660 Ti’s 12.0M / mm² on a 28 nm process.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The GTX 660 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 144.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This represents an eightfold increase in capacity and a roughly 4.3 times increase in bandwidth for the RX 7700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The sole head-to-head benchmark is the Geekbench OpenCL test, and it is a landslide. The RX 7700 achieves a score of 106,028, while the GTX 660 Ti manages 15,113. The delta percentage of 601.6% is the most significant metric in this comparison, dwarfing any other performance gap. This result is consistent with the generational leap in specifications, as the RX 7700 outputs 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to the GTX 660 Ti’s 2.634 TFLOPS.

To contextualize this within their respective peer groups, the RX 7700’s average score of 15,852 places it just 0.1% below its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, and 1.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The GTX 660 Ti’s average score of 15,063 is 0.1% below the AMD Radeon Pro 560X and 1.4% below the AMD Radeon 680M. While the GTX 660 Ti is competitive with its immediate peers, the RX 7700’s performance in the OpenCL test is in a completely different tier, indicating that its average score is held back by the inclusion of older API benchmarks where it does not excel as proportionally. The data shows the RX 7700’s lead is not incremental but exponential, driven by architectural efficiency and raw compute resources.

Specification Differences

The specification gap between these two cards is vast. The RX 7700 operates at a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2459 MHz, while the GTX 660 Ti runs at 915 MHz base and 980 MHz boost. Memory capacity differs eightfold: 16 GB of GDDR6 for the AMD card versus 2 GB of GDDR5 for the NVIDIA card. The memory bus is 256-bit versus 192-bit, and bandwidth is 624.1 GB/s versus 144.2 GB/s.

Compute resources also diverge sharply. The RX 7700 has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, while the GTX 660 Ti has 1,344 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. Pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s for the RX 7700 versus 27.44 GPixel/s for the GTX 660 Ti, and texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s versus 109.8 GTexel/s. Power requirements differ as well, with the RX 7700 rated at 200 W TDP and a suggested 550 W PSU, while the GTX 660 Ti runs at 150 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU. The RX 7700 uses dual 8-pin power connectors, whereas the GTX 660 Ti uses dual 6-pin connectors. Display outputs are also different: the RX 7700 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, while the GTX 660 Ti provides 2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 1x DisplayPort 1.2.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is fundamental. The RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip with a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GTX 660 Ti uses the Kepler architecture, based on the GK104 chip, fabricated on a 28 nm process. The RX 7700 has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, resulting in a density of 81.2M / mm², while the GTX 660 Ti packs 3,540 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a density of 12.0M / mm².

The RX 7700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and includes 40 ray tracing cores. The GTX 660 Ti supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175, but has no ray tracing cores. The RX 7700 also has a game clock of 2041 MHz, a feature absent from the GTX 660 Ti’s specifications. The production status also differs, with the RX 7700 marked as Active and the GTX 660 Ti as End-of-life. The RX 7700 is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, succeeding Navi II, while the GTX 660 Ti belongs to the GeForce 600 generation, succeeding GeForce 500 and preceding GeForce 700.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7700
GTX 660 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
1,344 -47.5%
Shaders
2,560
1,344 -47.5%
TMUs
160
112 -30.0%
ROPs
96
24 -75.0%
Compute Units
40
—
Clocks
Base Clock
1900 MHz
915 MHz
Boost Clock
2459 MHz
980 MHz
Game Clock
2041 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2041 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2438 MHz 19.5 Gbps effective
1502 MHz 6 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
2,048 -87.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bus
256 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
624.1 GB/s
144.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
16 KB (per SMX)
L2 Cache
2 MB
384 KB
L3 Cache
64 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
236.1 GPixel/s
27.44 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
393.4 GTexel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
25.18 TFLOPS
2.634 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
786.9 GFLOPS (1:32)
109.8 GFLOPS (1:24)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
25.18 TFLOPS (1:1)
—
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
—
Matrix Cores
80
—
Power
TDP
200 W
150 W
TDP (W)
200
150 -25.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
450 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
2x 6-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Kepler
GPU Name
Navi 32
GK104
Codename
Wheat Nas
—
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
GeForce 600
Process Size
5 nm
28 nm
Transistors
28,100 million
3,540 million
Die Size
346 mm²
294 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
81.2M / mm²
12.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.2.175
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
3.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.5 (5.1)
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
241 mm 9.5 inches
Height
135 mm 5.3 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
2x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
299 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
GeForce 500
Successor
Navi IV
GeForce 700
View Radeon RX 7700 Details View GeForce GTX 660 Ti Details