AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT

The benchmark data presents a lopsided contest: the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT wins 9 of 10 head-to-head tests, yet the two GPUs land within 1.8% of each other in average benchmark score (12,710 vs 12,940). This apparent contradiction stems from the AMD card's dominance in raw compute and modern API workloads, while the NVIDIA card holds a single, dramatic victory in Vulkan performance. The RX 760M XT is the more capable overall mobile GPU, but the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile remains relevant for specific software stacks.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT if you prioritize modern DirectX 12 workloads, compute performance, or higher resolution gaming. It delivers 336.7% higher scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (2048 vs 469), 29.3% higher OpenCL scores (74,869 vs 57,915), and 37.8% higher PassMark G3D scores (13,907 vs 10,093). Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory at 288.0 GB/s bandwidth doubles the RTX 3050 Ti's 4 GB and 192.0 GB/s, making it the better choice for texture-heavy titles.

Pick the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile only if your application ecosystem is Vulkan-centric. The data shows a 100.8% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan (55,812 vs 27,793), a gap so large it suggests a fundamental API optimization difference. For users locked into Vulkan-based engines or workloads, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the safer bet despite losing nearly every other benchmark.

The percentile data complicates the picture: the AMD card sits at the 52nd percentile among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card is at the 53rd percentile. Both are mid-pack mobile parts, yet the AMD card's average score (12,710) is slightly lower than its rival's (12,940) because of the extreme Vulkan outlier. In practical terms, the RX 7600M XT is the superior gaming and compute GPU, while the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a niche Vulkan specialist.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT wins decisively in raw compute and modern graphics APIs. Its PassMark GPU Compute score of 7,140 exceeds the NVIDIA card's 4,305 by 65.8%. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result (2048 vs 469) shows a 336.7% advantage, indicating the RDNA 3.0 architecture handles DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads far more efficiently. Legacy DirectX tests also favor AMD: DirectX 9 (175 vs 120, +45.8%), DirectX 11 (137 vs 76, +80.3%), and DirectX 10 (76 vs 60, +26.7%). The 2D performance gap is similarly large, with PassMark G2D scores of 894 vs 498 (+79.5%).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile wins exclusively in Geekbench Vulkan. The 55,812 score vs 27,793 represents a 100.8% advantage, the single largest margin in either direction across all tests. This is not a marginal win; it is a doubling of performance. The implication is that the Ampere architecture's Vulkan driver stack or hardware scheduler provides exceptional efficiency in this specific benchmark, which does not translate to other workloads.

The wins break down as 9 for AMD and 1 for NVIDIA across the ten head-to-head tests. The AMD card's victories range from 15.5% (PassMark DirectX 12) to 336.7% (3DMark Steel Nomad), while NVIDIA's sole win is the 100.8% Vulkan margin. This distribution suggests the RX 7600M XT is broadly superior, with the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's Vulkan strength being an outlier rather than a trend.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs stem from different architectural generations and fabrication processes. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses the GA106 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process, measuring 276 mm² with 12,000 million transistors (43.5M per mm²). The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses the Navi 33 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, measuring 204 mm² with 13,300 million transistors (65.2M per mm²). The AMD chip packs 10.8% more transistors into a 26.1% smaller die, yielding a 49.9% higher transistor density.

Core configurations differ markedly. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, while the RX 7600M XT has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Despite having 20% fewer shading units, the AMD card achieves 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 vs 5.299 TFLOPS for NVIDIA — a 281.8% advantage. This stems from the RDNA 3.0 architecture's dual-issue FP32 design and much higher clocks: 2,469 MHz boost vs 1,035 MHz, with a 2,023 MHz game clock. The AMD card's pixel rate (158.0 GPixel/s) is 377.1% higher than NVIDIA's 33.12 GPixel/s, and its texture rate (316.0 GTexel/s) is 281.6% higher than 82.80 GTexel/s.

Memory subsystems also favor AMD. The RX 7600M XT offers 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus at 288.0 GB/s, versus 4 GB on the same bus width at 192.0 GB/s for NVIDIA. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, while the RX 7600M XT has 32 RT cores and no tensor cores — a notable feature divergence for AI workloads. Power envelopes differ substantially: 75 W TDP for NVIDIA vs 120 W for AMD, which may influence laptop thermal designs.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card is end-of-life, released May 2021, while the AMD card is active, released January 2023. The AMD part's 6 nm process and newer architecture explain its superior efficiency-per-clock and raw throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS, a 281.8% advantage. Its PassMark GPU Compute score of 7,140 also exceeds 4,305 by 65.8%.

Q: Why does the NVIDIA card win the Vulkan benchmark despite losing other tests?

A: In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile scores 55,812 versus 27,793 for the RX 7600M XT, a 100.8% difference. This indicates Ampere's Vulkan implementation is exceptionally well-optimized, but this advantage does not extend to other API workloads where AMD leads.

Q: How do memory configurations compare?

A: The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 128-bit bus. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 4 GB GDDR6 with 192.0 GB/s on the same bus width. The AMD card offers double the capacity and 50% more bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU is better for DirectX 12 gaming?

A: The RX 7600M XT dominates in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2048 versus 469 for the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, a 336.7% advantage. PassMark DirectX 12 also favors AMD (58 vs 49, +18.4%).

Q: What are the power consumption differences?

A: The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has a 75 W TDP, while the RX 7600M XT has a 120 W TDP. The AMD card consumes 60% more power but delivers substantially higher performance across most benchmarks.

Q: Are these GPUs from the same generation?

A: No. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is from the GeForce 30-series (Ampere, 8 nm), released May 2021 and now end-of-life. The RX 7600M XT is from the Radeon RX 7000 series (RDNA 3.0, 6 nm), released January 2023 and still active.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test produces the largest disparity in the entire comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT scores 2048, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile manages only 469 — a 77.1% deficit for NVIDIA. This 336.7% advantage for AMD reflects the RDNA 3.0 architecture's superior DirectX 12 throughput, driven by its 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 capability and 158.0 GPixel/s pixel rate. No other test comes close to this margin, making it the clearest signal of architectural superiority.

The Geekbench Vulkan test flips the script entirely. NVIDIA's 55,812 score doubles AMD's 27,793, a 100.8% swing in favor of the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile. This result is anomalous given the AMD card's dominance elsewhere, but it underscores the importance of driver optimization. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores may contribute to Vulkan compute efficiency, though the exact mechanism is not evident from the data alone.

Geekbench OpenCL shows a more moderate AMD win: 74,869 vs 57,915, a 22.6% margin. This aligns with the PassMark GPU Compute result (7,140 vs 4,305, +65.8%), confirming that the RX 7600M XT is the stronger compute GPU. The OpenCL gap is smaller than compute-only tests suggest, likely because memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s) and shading unit count (2,048 vs 2,560) partially offset each other.

PassMark tests consistently favor AMD, with margins ranging from 15.5% to 80.3%. The DirectX 11 result (137 vs 76, +80.3%) and DirectX 9 result (175 vs 120, +45.8%) show the AMD card's legacy API efficiency. The DirectX 12 score (58 vs 49, +18.4%) is the narrowest PassMark win, suggesting that while AMD leads, the gap narrows in modern APIs outside of 3DMark. The G2D score (894 vs 498, +79.5%) indicates the AMD card also has superior 2D compositing performance, which affects desktop and UI responsiveness.

The PassMark G3D score (13,907 vs 10,093, +37.8%) provides a holistic gaming performance estimate. This 27.4% deficit for NVIDIA is substantial but less extreme than the 3DMark result, suggesting that real-world gaming differences may be smaller than peak synthetic tests imply. The RX 7600M XT's 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs versus 32 ROPs and 80 TMUs for NVIDIA explain much of this advantage, as pixel and texture throughput are critical for fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The cumulative picture is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT wins nine of ten benchmarks, including every test that measures gaming, compute, or 2D performance. The sole NVIDIA victory in Vulkan is remarkable for its magnitude but insufficient to overcome the AMD card's broad superiority. The RTX 3050 Ti Mobile remains a functional mobile GPU, but the data positions it as a legacy part facing a much stronger modern competitor.