AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2755 MHz
TDP 190 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 96 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2617 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 512 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,348
16,408
geekbench_opencl
92,426
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
48,366
N/A
passmark_directx_10
85
N/A
passmark_directx_11
167
N/A
passmark_directx_12
65
N/A
passmark_directx_9
228
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,030
N/A
passmark_g3d
17,132
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
8,987
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell occupy opposite ends of the graphics card spectrum, yet the benchmark data reveals a surprisingly narrow gap in overall percentile ranking. The RX 7600 XT sits at the 60th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits at the 59th, despite the NVIDIA card delivering nearly seven times the raw 3DMark performance. This discrepancy highlights that these products are engineered for entirely different workloads, and the choice between them depends almost exclusively on the specific demands of the software you run, not on a simple comparison of frame rates.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the clear winner in conventional rasterization and compute benchmarks that stress a wide range of legacy and modern APIs. In the Passmark suite, it dominates across the board: it scores 228 in DirectX 9, 167 in DirectX 11, 85 in DirectX 10, and 65 in DirectX 12. Its Passmark G3D score of 17,132 and G2D score of 1,030 are substantial, and its GPU compute score of 8,987 shows strong general-purpose math throughput. In Geekbench, it posts 92,426 in OpenCL and 48,366 in Vulkan, indicating that it handles both compute and graphics APIs with equal competence.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins in the only benchmark where both cards were tested head-to-head: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It scores 16,408 compared to the RX 7600 XT’s 2,348, a performance advantage of 85.7 percent in that specific test. The NVIDIA card’s architecture is built for maximum throughput in modern, heavy DirectX 12 workloads, which is why it excels there. However, the data shows that the RX 7600 XT is more versatile across older DirectX versions and OpenCL compute, making it the better choice for users running a mix of legacy applications or software that relies on those specific APIs.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two cards is stark, starting with the manufacturing process. The RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm TSMC node with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is built on a 5 nm TSMC node with 92,200 million transistors on a massive 750 mm² die, achieving 122.9 million transistors per square millimeter. This means the NVIDIA chip packs nearly seven times more transistors into a die that is roughly three and a half times larger.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different as well. The RX 7600 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth — a more than sixfold increase in memory capacity and bandwidth. The NVIDIA card also features a much wider execution engine: 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs, compared to the AMD’s 2,048 shaders, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell also includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, while the RX 7600 XT has 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores at all.

Clock speeds are interesting because the AMD card runs higher. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a base of 1590 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz, but no game clock specified. Despite lower clocks, the NVIDIA card’s sheer scale gives it far higher peak throughput: 126.0 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute versus 22.57 TFLOPS for the AMD card. The interface also differs, with the RX 7600 XT using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell using PCIe 5.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, which is over six times the 288.0 GB/s of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT.

Q: Can the AMD card handle ray tracing workloads?

A: Yes, the RX 7600 XT includes 32 ray tracing cores, but the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 188 of them, indicating a far higher capacity for ray tracing calculations, though no ray tracing benchmarks were provided.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and requires a 450 W power supply, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a TDP of 600 W and requires a 1000 W power supply.

Q: Are these cards the same physical size?

A: No. The RX 7600 XT is 204 mm long and 115 mm tall, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, making it substantially larger.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so there is no difference in API feature level.

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17,083, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has an average of 16,408. The RX 7600 XT actually scores slightly higher on average because it has more benchmark results across a wider range of tests.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every major specification category, with the only similarities being their dual-slot design and API support. The RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm process, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses 5 nm. The AMD card has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die; the NVIDIA card has 92,200 million on a 750 mm² die. Memory capacity is 16 GB of GDDR6 versus 96 GB of GDDR7, with bus widths of 128-bit and 512-bit, respectively. Bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 1.79 TB/s.

The compute resources are vastly different: the RX 7600 XT has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, and 188 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card also has 752 tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks entirely. Clock speeds favor AMD: 1980 MHz base and 2755 MHz boost versus 1590 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost for NVIDIA. Peak FP32 performance is 22.57 TFLOPS for AMD and 126.0 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. The AMD card draws 190 W and uses a 1x 8-pin connector, while the NVIDIA card draws 600 W and uses a 1x 16-pin connector. The RX 7600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has 1x HDMI 2.1a plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs; the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Only one benchmark was run on both cards, which makes the comparison clear and decisive. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scored 16,408 points against the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT’s 2,348 points. The delta is -85.7 percent for the AMD card, meaning the NVIDIA card outperformed it by that margin. This is not a small difference; it is a complete blowout in a modern, DirectX 12-heavy workload that stresses raw throughput, memory bandwidth, and shader processing.

The RX 7600 XT has its own set of wins in the broader benchmark suite, though none were run on the NVIDIA card. Its Passmark G3D score of 17,132 is nearly as high as the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell’s Steel Nomad score, but the tests are not comparable. The AMD card’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 228 and DirectX 11 score of 167 show it handles older APIs effectively, while its Geekbench OpenCL score of 92,426 and Vulkan score of 48,366 demonstrate strong compute and modern graphics performance in those specific tests. The NVIDIA card simply has no data for those workloads, so the RX 7600 XT is the only card in this comparison that can claim verified performance across a wide range of API generations.

The Verdict

The data points to a simple conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the card for users who run a diverse mix of software, including legacy DirectX 9, 10, and 11 applications, as well as OpenCL compute tasks. Its Passmark and Geekbench scores show it is a balanced, capable performer that does not specialize in any single API, and its 60th percentile ranking reflects broad usability. It also has a lower power requirement at 190 W, a smaller physical footprint, and a simpler 8-pin power connector, making it far easier to install in a wider range of systems.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the card for users who need maximum performance in a single, modern DirectX 12 workload. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,408 is 85.7 percent higher than the AMD card’s, and its massive memory pool of 96 GB, 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, and 126.0 TFLOPS of compute make it a specialized tool for heavy, professional-grade rendering or simulation tasks that leverage those resources. The trade-off is a 600 W power draw, a 1000 W recommended PSU, and a larger card that requires more case space. Its 59th percentile ranking is misleading because it is based on a single benchmark, so its true value is in that one specific high-end workload. Choose the RX 7600 XT for versatility and general use; choose the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell for extreme DirectX 12 performance where nothing else matters.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7600 XT
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
24,064 +1075.0%
Shaders
2,048
24,064 +1075.0%
TMUs
128
752 +487.5%
ROPs
64
192 +200.0%
Compute Units
32
—
SM Count
—
188
Clocks
Base Clock
1980 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2755 MHz
2617 MHz
Game Clock
2470 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2470 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
96 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
98,304 +500.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
128 bit
512 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
1.79 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
128 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
176.3 GPixel/s
502.5 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
352.6 GTexel/s
1,968.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
22.57 TFLOPS
126.0 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
705.3 GFLOPS (1:32)
1.968 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.57 TFLOPS (1:1)
126.0 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
188 +487.5%
Tensor Cores
—
752
Matrix Cores
64
—
Power
TDP
190 W
600 W
TDP (W)
190
600 +215.8%
Suggested PSU
450 W
1000 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 33
GB202
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
—
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
92,200 million
Die Size
204 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
204 mm 8 inches
304 mm 12 inches
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
329 USD
8,565 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II
Workstation Ada
Successor
Navi IV
—
View Radeon RX 7600 XT Details View RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Details