AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
GeForce GTX TITAN
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a decisive performance differential between these two graphics cards across the shared benchmark suite. The database contains two head-to-head comparisons, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins both by substantial margins, with no wins recorded for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN.
Starting with Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 92,426 points against 24,873 points for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN. This represents a 271.6% advantage for the AMD card, a delta that places the newer architecture in a completely different performance tier for compute workloads that leverage OpenCL. The Geekbench Vulkan test shows an even more pronounced gap: the RX 7600 XT records 48,366 points while the GTX TITAN manages only 10,027 points, yielding a 382.4% lead for the AMD part. Vulkan is a modern low-level API, and the RX 7600 XT's support for Vulkan 1.4 compared to the GTX TITAN's Vulkan 1.2.175 likely contributes to this result, though the raw hardware differences are the primary driver.
Looking at the broader benchmark context, the RX 7600 XT's average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 17,083, while the GTX TITAN averages 14,373. The RX 7600 XT also sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database, compared to the 56th percentile for the GTX TITAN. While both cards occupy the middle of the overall distribution, the RX 7600 XT's percentile ranking is meaningfully higher.
The nearest rival data places each card in different competitive neighborhoods. The RX 7600 XT's closest competitors by average score include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17,037 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17,019 (0.4% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 at 17,208 (0.7% ahead), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16,932 (0.9% behind). Meanwhile, the GTX TITAN's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 at 14,385 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon Vega 11 at 14,352 (0.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M at 14,404 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics at 14,315 (0.4% behind). This positioning underscores the generational gap: the GTX TITAN now trades blows with integrated and entry-level discrete GPUs, while the RX 7600 XT competes with much more recent hardware.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the stronger performer in every recorded comparison. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks, holds a higher average score, and achieves a higher percentile ranking. For any user prioritizing raw compute performance in OpenCL or Vulkan workloads, the RX 7600 XT is the correct choice based solely on the measured results.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN, despite its historical significance and higher launch MSRP of 999 USD, now trails the RX 7600 XT by margins that are difficult to overstate. The RX 7600 XT's launch MSRP of 329 USD, combined with its benchmark superiority, makes the performance gap particularly stark from a historical perspective, though pricing considerations are not the focus here.
Users who already own a GTX TITAN and are evaluating an upgrade should note that the RX 7600 XT offers more than triple the Vulkan performance and nearly quadruple the OpenCL performance in the recorded tests. Those who are choosing between these two cards today, with the GTX TITAN being end-of-life and the RX 7600 XT still active in production, should select the AMD card without hesitation based on the benchmark data.
Architecture Differences
The architectural divide between these two GPUs is substantial, reflecting over a decade of semiconductor advancement. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN, in contrast, uses the GK110 chip on the Kepler architecture, belongs to the GeForce 700 generation, and is built on a 28 nm process, also at TSMC. It packs 7,080 million transistors onto a much larger 561 mm² die, giving a transistor density of just 12.6 million transistors per square millimeter.
The clock speed disparity is equally pronounced. The RX 7600 XT operates with a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2755 MHz, with a game clock of 2470 MHz. The GTX TITAN runs at a base clock of 836 MHz and a boost clock of 876 MHz. The RX 7600 XT's higher clocks, combined with its architectural efficiency, explain much of the benchmark gap.
Memory configurations differ in capacity, type, and bus width, though bandwidth is nearly identical. The RX 7600 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, while the GTX TITAN has 6 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 384-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.4 GB/s. The RX 7600 XT achieves comparable bandwidth with a narrower bus by running its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the GTX TITAN's 1502 MHz (6 Gbps effective).
Core counts reveal different design philosophies. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, plus 32 ray tracing cores. The GTX TITAN has 2688 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores. The GTX TITAN's higher shading unit and TMU counts reflect its older, wider design, but the RX 7600 XT's newer architecture delivers far higher throughput per unit.
Pixel and texture rates follow the clock and architecture differences. The RX 7600 XT achieves a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s, while the GTX TITAN manages 49.06 GPixel/s and 196.2 GTexel/s respectively. FP32 compute is another area of massive divergence: the RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS, while the GTX TITAN delivers 4.709 TFLOPS. The RX 7600 XT also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio (22.57 TFLOPS), whereas the GTX TITAN has no recorded FP16 capability.
Power requirements differ notably. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The GTX TITAN has a TDP of 250 W, uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, and requires a 600 W suggested PSU. Both are dual-slot cards, but the RX 7600 XT is shorter at 204 mm (8 inches) versus 267 mm (10.5 inches) for the GTX TITAN.
The bus interface also differs: the RX 7600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the GTX TITAN uses PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs reflect their respective eras: the RX 7600 XT offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the GTX TITAN provides 2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 1x DisplayPort 1.2. API support shows the RX 7600 XT supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, versus the GTX TITAN's DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175.
FAQ
Q: Which card has more memory?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN has 6 GB of GDDR5 memory.
Q: What is the performance difference in Vulkan benchmarks?
A: The RX 7600 XT scores 48,366 in Geekbench Vulkan, which is 382.4% higher than the GTX TITAN's score of 10,027.
Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?
A: The RX 7600 XT has a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter, compared to 12.6 million per square millimeter for the GTX TITAN.
Q: Does the GTX TITAN support ray tracing?
A: No, the GTX TITAN has no ray tracing cores, while the RX 7600 XT includes 32 ray tracing cores.
Q: What is the boost clock for each card?
A: The RX 7600 XT boosts to 2755 MHz, while the GTX TITAN boosts to 876 MHz.
Q: Which card is still in production?
A: The RX 7600 XT has an active production status, while the GTX TITAN is marked as end-of-life.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins in every recorded benchmark category. In Geekbench OpenCL, it leads by 271.6%, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it leads by 382.4%. Its average benchmark score of 17,083 surpasses the GTX TITAN's 14,373 by a wide margin. The RX 7600 XT also wins on efficiency metrics: it delivers higher performance with a lower TDP of 190 W versus 250 W, and requires a less powerful PSU at 450 W versus 600 W.
For compute-heavy workloads that utilize OpenCL, such as general-purpose GPU computing, the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides nearly five times the theoretical compute throughput of the GTX TITAN's 4.709 TFLOPS. For modern gaming APIs like Vulkan, the RX 7600 XT's support for version 1.4 and its much higher benchmark score make it the clear choice.
The GTX TITAN's advantages are limited to specifications that do not translate into benchmark wins. It has more shading units (2688 versus 2048), more TMUs (224 versus 128), a wider memory bus (384-bit versus 128-bit), and a marginally higher memory bandwidth (288.4 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s). However, none of these theoretical advantages appear in the recorded benchmark results. The GTX TITAN also has a larger die size at 561 mm², which historically correlates with higher manufacturing cost, but this does not benefit the end user.
For users with legacy software that relies on older APIs, the GTX TITAN's DirectX 12 (11_0) support and Vulkan 1.2.175 may be sufficient, but the RX 7600 XT's DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 provide forward compatibility. The RX 7600 XT also offers more modern display outputs, including DisplayPort 2.1, which the GTX TITAN lacks entirely.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ in nearly every recorded specification. The RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm process node, while the GTX TITAN uses 28 nm. Transistor counts are 13,300 million versus 7,080 million. Die sizes are 204 mm² versus 561 mm². Base clocks are 1980 MHz versus 836 MHz. Boost clocks are 2755 MHz versus 876 MHz. Memory sizes are 16 GB versus 6 GB. Memory types are GDDR6 versus GDDR5. Bus widths are 128-bit versus 384-bit. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz versus 1502 MHz.
The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The GTX TITAN has 2688 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores. Pixel rates are 176.3 GPixel/s versus 49.06 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 352.6 GTexel/s versus 196.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 22.57 TFLOPS versus 4.709 TFLOPS. The RX 7600 XT supports FP16 at 22.57 TFLOPS, while the GTX TITAN has no recorded FP16 value.
TDP ratings are 190 W versus 250 W. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Suggested PSUs are 450 W versus 600 W. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a + 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 2x DVI + 1x HDMI 1.4a + 1x DisplayPort 1.2. DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (11_0). Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.2.175. Card lengths are 204 mm versus 267 mm. Heights are 115 mm versus 111 mm. The RX 7600 XT is active in production, while the GTX TITAN is end-of-life. Release dates are 2024-01-23 versus 2013-02-18. Launch MSRPs are 329 USD versus 999 USD.