AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Arc B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In this test, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 2348 points, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 points. The delta is 98.3%, meaning the AMD card delivers nearly double the performance of the Intel part in this specific workload. This is a decisive win for AMD, and the magnitude of the gap indicates a fundamental difference in performance class rather than a marginal advantage.

To contextualize the RX 7600 XT's score, the database shows its average benchmark score across all tests is 17083. Its nearest rivals in the overall standings include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which averages 17208 points (a delta of -0.7% relative to the RX 7600 XT), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, which averages 17037 points (a delta of 0.3%). This places the RX 7600 XT in a competitive position against older and newer NVIDIA offerings, with the data showing it sits within a narrow range of these peers. The RX 7600 XT holds a 60th percentile rank across all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc B370, in contrast, has an average benchmark score of just 1184, derived solely from that single Steel Nomad result. Its nearest rivals are significantly older and lower-powered parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186 (a delta of -0.2%), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 averages 1190 (a delta of -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M averages 1192 (a delta of -0.7%). The Arc B370's 5th percentile rank across all GPUs confirms that it occupies the lower end of the performance spectrum, far removed from the RX 7600 XT's mid-range standing.

The data indicates that in the Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 7600 XT is not merely ahead, it is in a different tier altogether. The 98.3% delta is a clear signal that these products are not direct competitors in raw rasterization performance. The RX 7600 XT's score of 2348 is nearly double the Arc B370's 1184, and this single data point drives the entire head-to-head comparison. The wins tally in the database confirms this: the RX 7600 XT records 1 win, and the Arc B370 records 0 wins.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 2348, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The RX 7600 XT leads by 98.3% in this test.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Arc B370's average score is 1184. It is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190), and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192). It is 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168).

Q: What is the performance difference between the RX 7600 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's average score of 17083. The RX 7600 XT is also 0.3% ahead of the GTX 690 (17037) and 0.4% ahead of the Radeon HD 7970M (17019).

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7600 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RX 7600 XT has a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Arc B370's transistor density is not listed in the database.

Q: What are the TDP values for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W, while the Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W. The Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), whereas the RX 7600 XT is a dual-slot discrete card.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip based on Xe3-LPG architecture and is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is significant: 6 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel, indicating a much newer manufacturing technology for the Intel part.

The RX 7600 XT contains 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm², giving it a density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Arc B370's transistor count and die size are both listed as unknown in the database, so a direct comparison of transistor budgets is not possible. However, the RX 7600 XT's architecture is designed for high-throughput rasterization, with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 render output units (ROPs). It also includes 32 ray tracing cores.

The Arc B370, by contrast, has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, along with 10 ray tracing cores. This is a substantially smaller execution resource pool. The RX 7600 XT's pixel rate is 176.3 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s, while the Arc B370's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. These rates reflect the raw output capabilities of each design, with the AMD part delivering roughly 3.7 times the pixel throughput and 3.7 times the texture throughput.

Compute performance follows a similar pattern. The RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS for FP32 and 22.57 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The Arc B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The FP16 advantage for Intel is notable, but the FP32 performance is far lower. The RX 7600 XT also has a higher boost clock at 2755 MHz compared to the Arc B370's 2400 MHz, and its base clock is 1980 MHz versus 300 MHz for the Intel part. The Arc B370's low base clock suggests a power-optimized design, consistent with its 25 W TDP.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal several key differences beyond raw performance. The RX 7600 XT is a discrete, dual-slot card that requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested power supply. The Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU, fitting directly into a portable device. The RX 7600 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Arc B370's bus interface is listed as IGP.

Memory is another major differentiator. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Arc B370 uses system shared memory, meaning its capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. This is a fundamental architectural difference: dedicated high-bandwidth memory versus shared system memory.

Display outputs also differ. The RX 7600 XT offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Arc B370's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by the device it is integrated into. The RX 7600 XT measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height; the Arc B370 has no listed dimensions, as it is not a standalone card. The RX 7600 XT has a release date of 2024-01-23, while the Arc B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26, indicating a later launch for the Intel part.

The RX 7600 XT has a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The Arc B370 has no launch MSRP listed. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7600 XT's TDP is 190 W, while the Arc B370's TDP is 25 W, a difference of 165 W that underscores the discrete versus integrated positioning.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a mid-range discrete graphics card with a 60th percentile rank across all GPUs, an average benchmark score of 17083, and a strong showing in the Steel Nomad DX12 test at 2348. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, against which it trails by only 0.7%, and the GTX 690, against which it leads by 0.3%. This is a card that performs within a narrow band of established discrete GPUs.

The Intel Arc B370 is a low-power integrated processor with a 5th percentile rank and an average score of 1184. Its nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5570, all within a 1.4% delta. The Arc B370 is not competing with the RX 7600 XT in any meaningful sense; its performance class is several tiers lower. The 98.3% delta in the head-to-head benchmark confirms this.

For a user seeking discrete GPU performance, the RX 7600 XT is the only viable choice based on the recorded data. It offers dedicated memory, high bandwidth, and a robust feature set for DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads. The Arc B370, as an IGP, is suited for portable devices where power consumption is paramount, but its benchmark results place it far behind any discrete solution.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins in every recorded benchmark category where both have data. The single head-to-head test, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, shows a 98.3% advantage for AMD. The RX 7600 XT also holds superior specifications across the board: higher shading unit count (2048 vs 1280), higher TMU count (128 vs 40), higher ROP count (64 vs 20), and more ray tracing cores (32 vs 10). Its pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s are approximately 3.7 times higher than the Arc B370's respective rates of 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is also 3.7 times higher (22.57 TFLOPS vs 6.144 TFLOPS). The RX 7600 XT's dedicated 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is a clear advantage over the Arc B370's system shared memory.

The Intel Arc B370 wins in power efficiency and form factor. Its TDP of 25 W is drastically lower than the RX 7600 XT's 190 W, and it requires no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no expansion slot. It is an IGP, meaning it is integrated into a portable device and consumes no additional space. The Arc B370's FP16 compute of 12.29 TFLOPS is higher than its FP32 output, indicating a 2:1 ratio that could benefit certain compute workloads, though the absolute numbers remain far below the RX 7600 XT's FP16 output of 22.57 TFLOPS. The Arc B370 also uses a more advanced 3 nm process node compared to the RX 7600 XT's 6 nm node, though the database does not provide transistor counts for the Intel part to assess the impact of this process advantage.

In summary, the RX 7600 XT is the clear winner for any performance-oriented task, while the Arc B370's advantages are limited to its integrated, low-power design suitable for portable devices where discrete graphics are not an option.