AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the NVIDIA Tesla K10 are separated by more than a decade of GPU architecture, and the benchmark data reflects that chasm. In the only direct comparison available, the RX 7600 delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,051 against the Tesla K10’s 14,029, a decisive 527.6% advantage. This is not a close contest; it is a generational wipeout, with the modern card outperforming the legacy compute accelerator by a factor of roughly six in raw compute throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single head-to-head result tells the entire story. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 88,051, while the NVIDIA Tesla K10 scores 14,029. The delta is a staggering 527.6% in favor of the RX 7600. This means the RX 7600 delivers over six times the compute performance of the Tesla K10 in this workload. For context, the RX 7600’s average benchmark score across all tests is 15,171, while the Tesla K10’s is 14,029 — the K10’s only benchmark is its OpenCL result, so its average is identical to that single score.

The RX 7600 also dominates in absolute terms across other benchmark suites, although the Tesla K10 lacks comparable results in those tests. The RX 7600 posts a Passmark G3D score of 16,634, a Passmark GPU Compute score of 8,790, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310. Meanwhile, the Tesla K10 has no entries for DirectX 9, 10, 11, or 12, nor for 3DMark or Passmark G2D. This absence underscores that the K10 was never designed for the same workload profile; its sole data point is the OpenCL compute test, where it loses by over 500%.

Even the RX 7600’s worst-case comparison against its nearest rivals suggests strength. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15,199 on average, just 0.2% higher than the RX 7600’s 15,171. The AMD Radeon 680M trails by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X leads by 0.6%. The Tesla K10’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680, scores 14,150, which is 0.9% higher than the K10’s 14,029. In short, the RX 7600 sits in a modern performance tier, while the K10 is anchored to a much older baseline, with its closest competitors being low-power integrated graphics like the AMD Radeon 660M and RTX A2000 Mobile.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is enormous. The RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. In contrast, the Tesla K10 uses the GK104 chip with Kepler architecture, built on a 28 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains 3,540 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a density of just 12.0 million per square millimeter. The RX 7600 crams nearly four times the transistors into a smaller physical area.

Clock speeds amplify the difference. The RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The Tesla K10 lists no base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 1250 MHz (5 Gbps effective). This means the RX 7600’s core operates at speeds the K10 cannot approach, and the K10’s silicon was never rated for such frequencies.

Memory configurations also diverge sharply. The RX 7600 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Tesla K10 provides 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, with 160.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While the K10 has a wider bus, the RX 7600’s faster memory technology yields 80% more bandwidth. The RX 7600 also features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, alongside 32 ray tracing cores. The K10 has 1536 shading units, 128 TMUs, but only 32 ROPs, with no ray tracing support.

Compute rates reflect the architecture’s evolution. The RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio). The Tesla K10 manages just 2.289 TFLOPS of FP32 and has no listed FP16 capability. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: the RX 7600 hits 169.9 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s, while the K10 is limited to 23.84 GPixel/s and 95.36 GTexel/s. The RX 7600 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the K10 supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the superior product for virtually any workload. It wins the only head-to-head benchmark by 527.6%, has a higher average benchmark score (15,171 vs. 14,029), and offers modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate that the Tesla K10 lacks entirely. The K10’s percentile rank of 55 versus the RX 7600’s 57 shows that even in its own era, the K10 was not a top-tier performer, and it has aged poorly.

The Tesla K10’s only conceivable advantage is its launch MSRP of 5,099 USD, which is a historical artifact rather than a current value proposition. The RX 7600’s launch MSRP was 269 USD. However, the K10 is end-of-life, while the RX 7600 is active. The K10’s 225 W TDP and dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors require a 550 W suggested PSU, whereas the RX 7600 draws 165 W with a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The RX 7600 is also more efficient in every measurable way.

For gaming, content creation, or general compute, the RX 7600 is the only rational choice. For anyone considering the Tesla K10, the data offers no justification: it is slower, older, less efficient, and has no display outputs, meaning it cannot even drive a monitor without a secondary GPU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | NVIDIA Tesla K10 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 3,540 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 12.0M / mm² |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 1536 |

| ROPs | 64 | 32 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | None |

| FP32 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | Not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 23.84 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 95.36 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 165 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.2.175 |

| Length | 204 mm (8 inches) | 272 mm (10.7 inches) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2012-04-30 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 wins decisively with a score of 88,051 versus the NVIDIA Tesla K10’s 14,029, a 527.6% advantage.

Q: What are the memory capacities of these two cards?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Tesla K10 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 160.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Tesla K10 support ray tracing?

A: No, the Tesla K10 has no ray tracing cores. The RX 7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, while the Tesla K10 has a higher TDP of 225 W, requiring a 450 W and 550 W suggested PSU, respectively.

Q: Can the Tesla K10 output video to a display?

A: No, the Tesla K10 has no display outputs. The RX 7600 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 connectors.

Q: What are the production statuses of these GPUs?

A: The RX 7600 is listed as Active, while the Tesla K10 is End-of-life, with release dates of 2023-05-24 and 2012-04-30, respectively.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 wins in every measurable category from the FACT PACK. It is the only card with a display output, making it suitable for gaming, desktop use, and any visual workload. Its 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly ten times the Tesla K10’s 2.289 TFLOPS, and its 32 ray tracing cores enable modern rendering techniques that the K10 cannot execute. The RX 7600’s 8 GB memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth also provide a more practical buffer for contemporary games and applications.

The NVIDIA Tesla K10 has no wins in the data. Its only benchmark result is a loss, and its specification sheet shows it is smaller in every performance metric except memory bus width (256 bit vs. 128 bit) and length (272 mm vs. 204 mm). Even its transistor density is lower, at 12.0M / mm² versus 65.2M / mm². The K10’s sole advantage is its launch MSRP of 5,099 USD, which is a historical price point and not a current recommendation.

For compute workloads that rely solely on OpenCL, the RX 7600 is over six times faster. For any task requiring modern API features like DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan 1.4, the RX 7600 is the only option. The Tesla K10 is a legacy accelerator with no display support, no ray tracing, and a higher power draw. The data shows no scenario where the Tesla K10 outperforms the RX 7600. Users with legacy compute needs might consider the K10’s wider memory bus, but the RX 7600’s superior bandwidth and compute rates negate that theoretical benefit. In every practical sense, the RX 7600 is the definitive winner.