AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Comparison

The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and the Radeon RX 7600 represent two different generations of graphics technology, and the recorded benchmark data shows a clear split in their strengths. The AMD card wins the majority of the head-to-head tests, taking 7 out of 10, while the NVIDIA card secures 3 decisive victories, including a massive lead in one specific API test. The data suggests that the choice between these two depends heavily on the workload, with AMD dominating modern compute and DirectX 11 tasks, while NVIDIA retains a stronghold in Vulkan and legacy DirectX 10 scenarios.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon RX 7600 establishes its dominance in compute-heavy and general-purpose 3D rendering workloads. Its biggest victory comes in the PassMark GPU Compute test, where it scores 8,790 against the RTX 2060 SUPER's 6,721, a 23.5% advantage. This pattern repeats in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, where the RX 7600 posts 88,051 versus 76,957, a 12.6% lead. The AMD card also wins the modern 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test with a score of 2,310 compared to 2,011, a 12.9% margin, indicating stronger performance in current-generation DirectX 12 titles.

The RX 7600's wins extend into legacy DirectX APIs as well. In PassMark DirectX 11, it scores 172 against 130, a 24.4% advantage, and in DirectX 9 it edges ahead with 226 versus 218, a 3.5% margin. The AMD card also wins the 2D graphics test, scoring 984 versus 854, a 13.2% difference. Its closest overall result is in PassMark G3D, where it scores 16,634 against 16,462, a marginal 1% win.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, while losing the overall count, secures its most important victory in the Geekbench Vulkan test. Here it scores 77,402 against the RX 7600's 34,401, a staggering 125% advantage. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison. The NVIDIA card also wins PassMark DirectX 10 with a score of 111 versus 84, a 32.1% lead, and narrowly takes PassMark DirectX 12 with 61 versus 58, a 5.2% margin. These results indicate that the RTX 2060 SUPER is significantly better optimized for Vulkan-based workloads and retains an edge in older DirectX 10 titles.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The RTX 2060 SUPER uses the TU106 chip based on NVIDIA's Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It packs 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 24.3 million per mm². In contrast, the RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip with AMD's RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains 13,300 million transistors on a much smaller 204 mm² die, achieving a density of 65.2 million per mm².

The architectural differences translate into different core configurations. The RTX 2060 SUPER has 2,176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, reflecting its Turing-generation focus on ray tracing and AI acceleration. The RX 7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 RT cores but no tensor cores. Despite having fewer shading units, the RX 7600 achieves much higher clock speeds, with a boost clock of 2655 MHz compared to 1650 MHz on the RTX 2060 SUPER.

Memory configurations also differ significantly. Both cards have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, but the RTX 2060 SUPER uses a 256-bit bus providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the RX 7600 uses a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. The RTX 2060 SUPER has the higher bandwidth, but the RX 7600 compensates with faster effective memory speeds of 18 Gbps versus 14 Gbps.

The RX 7600's RDNA 3.0 architecture delivers substantially higher compute throughput. Its FP32 performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS, while the RTX 2060 SUPER achieves 7.181 TFLOPS. The AMD card also supports 1:1 FP16 rates at 21.75 TFLOPS, whereas the NVIDIA card offers 14.36 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel and texture rates follow suit, with the RX 7600 reaching 169.9 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s compared to 105.6 GPixel/s and 224.4 GTexel/s on the RTX 2060 SUPER.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Vulkan test is the clearest differentiator. The RTX 2060 SUPER scores 77,402 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the RX 7600 manages only 34,401. This 125% delta is remarkable and suggests that NVIDIA's driver stack and architecture are far more efficient in this API. For users running Vulkan-based games or applications, the RTX 2060 SUPER is clearly the superior choice based on this metric.

In compute workloads, the RX 7600 takes command. The PassMark GPU Compute test shows the AMD card at 8,790 versus 6,721, a 23.5% advantage. The Geekbench OpenCL test reinforces this, with the RX 7600 scoring 88,051 against 76,957, a 12.6% lead. These results indicate that the RX 7600 is better suited for general-purpose compute tasks and OpenCL acceleration.

The DirectX 11 test shows the largest single margin outside of Vulkan. The RX 7600 scores 172 versus 130, a 24.4% advantage. This is particularly relevant for older games and applications that still rely on DirectX 11. The DirectX 9 test is much closer, with the RX 7600 winning 226 to 218, a 3.5% margin. The DirectX 10 test, however, goes to the RTX 2060 SUPER by a significant 32.1% margin, scoring 111 versus 84.

In modern DirectX 12, the RX 7600 leads in the 3DMark Steel Nomad test with 2,310 versus 2,011, a 12.9% advantage. The PassMark DirectX 12 test is much closer, with the RTX 2060 SUPER winning 61 to 58, a 5.2% margin. This discrepancy suggests that the specific workload matters, as the 3DMark test favors the AMD card while the PassMark test favors NVIDIA.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has a higher average benchmark score of 18,093, while the RX 7600 averages 15,171. However, the RX 7600 wins 7 of 10 head-to-head tests, so the average is skewed by the RTX 2060 SUPER's massive Vulkan advantage.

Q: How do the two cards compare in Vulkan performance?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER dominates in Vulkan, scoring 77,402 in Geekbench Vulkan versus 34,401 for the RX 7600, a 125% advantage. This is the largest performance gap in any test between the two cards.

Q: What is the difference in shading unit count?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has 2,176 shading units, while the RX 7600 has 2,048. Despite having fewer units, the RX 7600 achieves much higher FP32 throughput at 21.75 TFLOPS versus 7.181 TFLOPS due to its higher clocks and RDNA 3.0 architecture.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has significantly higher memory bandwidth at 448.0 GB/s, compared to 288.0 GB/s on the RX 7600. This is due to the 256-bit bus on the NVIDIA card versus the 128-bit bus on the AMD card.

Q: How do the cards compare in DirectX 11 performance?

A: The RX 7600 wins DirectX 11 by a substantial margin, scoring 172 versus 130 on the RTX 2060 SUPER, a 24.4% advantage. This is one of the RX 7600's strongest results.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER is manufactured on a 12 nm process, while the RX 7600 uses a 6 nm process. Both are produced by TSMC, but the smaller node allows the RX 7600 to pack more transistors (13,300 million) on a smaller die (204 mm²).

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 7600 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 10,800 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | 445 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 24.3M / mm² | 65.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1470 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2655 MHz |

| Game Clock | N/A | 2250 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2176 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 136 | 128 |

| RT Cores | 34 | 32 |

| Tensor Cores | 272 | N/A |

| Pixel Rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 224.4 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.181 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 175 W | 165 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2019-07-08 | 2023-05-24 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture for different use cases. The Radeon RX 7600 is the better choice for users prioritizing compute performance, DirectX 11 gaming, and modern DirectX 12 workloads. Its 23.5% lead in GPU compute, 24.4% lead in DirectX 11, and 12.9% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad make it the stronger all-around performer for current gaming and productivity tasks. Its higher FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS versus 7.181 TFLOPS further reinforces this position.

The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, despite being older and at end-of-life, remains the definitive choice for Vulkan-based applications. Its 125% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan is overwhelming and suggests that NVIDIA's driver optimization for this API is far superior. It also wins DirectX 10 by 32.1% and narrowly takes PassMark DirectX 12, making it a viable option for users with specific legacy API requirements.

The RTX 2060 SUPER also offers higher memory bandwidth at 448.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s, which could benefit bandwidth-sensitive workloads. However, the RX 7600 counters with lower power consumption at 165 W versus 175 W, a smaller die, and a more modern 6 nm process. The RX 7600's higher average benchmark score in most individual tests, combined with its active production status, makes it the more future-proof choice for most users. The RTX 2060 SUPER is best reserved for those who specifically need Vulkan performance or legacy DirectX 10 support, where it remains unmatched in this comparison.