AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 occupy opposite ends of the low-power graphics spectrum. The recorded data shows the RX 7400 OEM as a higher-throughput RDNA 3.0 part with 8 GB of memory, while the RTX 4010 is a compact Ampere entry with 4 GB. Benchmarks exist only for the RTX 4010, so direct measured comparison is unavailable; instead, the analysis relies on architectural specifications, compute rates, and the RTX 4010’s single recorded 3DMark score against its nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for these two products. The only recorded benchmark result belongs to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, which scored 2893 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12. That score places the RTX 4010 at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating it sits well below the median performer. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has no benchmark scores recorded, and its percentileVsAllGpus field shows 50, suggesting it is positioned at the midpoint of all GPUs, though no measured data supports that figure directly.

The RTX 4010’s nearest rivals in the database are all within a narrow band. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB averages 2907, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010’s score. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF averages 2910, 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB averages 2913, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 averages 2923, 1% higher. These deltas are small, meaning the RTX 4010 performs nearly identically to those four cards in that specific test, despite being a far lower-tier product in terms of memory and compute. The data shows the RTX 4010 delivers competitive results in this one workload, but the RX 7400 OEM cannot be compared directly due to missing measurements.

Given the RX 7400 OEM’s higher shading unit count, texture mapping units, and memory bandwidth, it should theoretically outperform the RTX 4010 in rasterization-heavy tasks, but no recorded numbers confirm this. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, so the database offers no head-to-head verdict. The analysis must therefore rely on specification-derived expectations, not measured outcomes.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with a codename of Hotpink Bonefish. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip, based on Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. It packs 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The AMD part uses a newer, denser process node, which contributes to its higher transistor count despite a similar die size.

The RX 7400 OEM features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, with 6 ray tracing cores. The AMD card has more than double the shading units and nearly five times the TMUs. The RTX 4010 includes 24 tensor cores, a feature the RX 7400 OEM does not list. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7400 OEM has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, while the RTX 4010 runs at 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost. Despite the AMD card’s lower clocks, its wider execution resources produce much higher theoretical throughput. The RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS FP32 and the same 7.885 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The RTX 4010 delivers 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 2.706 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). That puts the AMD part at roughly 2.9 times the FP32 compute of the NVIDIA part. Pixel rate for the RX 7400 OEM is 70.40 GPixel/s, versus 28.19 GPixel/s for the RTX 4010. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s for AMD, versus 42.29 GTexel/s for NVIDIA.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective), producing 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4010 uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective), yielding 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card has double the capacity and 80% more bandwidth. Power draw is close, with the RX 7400 OEM rated at 55 W TDP and the RTX 4010 at 50 W TDP. Both require a 250 W suggested power supply. The RX 7400 OEM uses one 6-pin power connector, while the RTX 4010 has none, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot.

Physical dimensions are similar. The RX 7400 OEM is 167 mm long (6.6 inches), while the RTX 4010 is 163 mm long (6.4 inches) and 69 mm tall (2.7 inches). Both are single-slot designs. The AMD card outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The NVIDIA card uses 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 4010 has an active production status and was released in the database on 2024-04-15, while the RX 7400 OEM has no production status listed and a release date of 2025-08-07.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 172.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 96.00 GB/s. The AMD part also has 8 GB of GDDR6 versus 4 GB on the NVIDIA card.

Q: Does the RTX 4010 support tensor cores?

A: Yes, the RTX 4010 includes 24 tensor cores. The RX 7400 OEM does not list any tensor cores in the database.

Q: What is the RTX 4010’s recorded benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4010 scored 2893 in the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, scored 2907, which is 0.5% higher.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 4010 has a boost clock of 1762 MHz, compared to the RX 7400 OEM’s 1100 MHz. However, the RX 7400 OEM has higher theoretical compute rates due to more shading units.

Q: Are both cards single-slot designs?

A: Yes, both the RX 7400 OEM and the RTX 4010 are single-slot cards. The RX 7400 OEM is 167 mm long, and the RTX 4010 is 163 mm long and 69 mm tall.

Q: What process nodes do these cards use?

A: The RX 7400 OEM uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 4010 uses an 8 nm process at Samsung. The AMD chip has 13,300 million transistors, versus 8,700 million for NVIDIA.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every core specification. Shading units: 1792 on the RX 7400 OEM versus 768 on the RTX 4010. Texture mapping units: 112 versus 24. Raster output units: 64 versus 16. Ray tracing cores: 28 versus 6. Tensor cores: none listed on AMD versus 24 on NVIDIA.

Memory size: 8 GB versus 4 GB. Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 64 bit. Memory bandwidth: 172.8 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s. Memory clock: 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Base clock: 330 MHz versus 1417 MHz. Boost clock: 1100 MHz versus 1762 MHz. FP32 compute: 7.885 TFLOPS versus 2.706 TFLOPS. FP16 compute: 7.885 TFLOPS versus 2.706 TFLOPS. Pixel rate: 70.40 GPixel/s versus 28.19 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 42.29 GTexel/s.

Transistor count: 13,300 million versus 8,700 million. Die size: 204 mm² versus 200 mm². Transistor density: 65.2M / mm² versus 43.5M / mm². Process node: 6 nm TSMC versus 8 nm Samsung.

TDP: 55 W versus 50 W. Power connectors: 1x 6-pin versus none. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. Length: 167 mm versus 163 mm. The RTX 4010 also lists a height of 69 mm, which the RX 7400 OEM does not provide.

Release dates differ as well: 2025-08-07 for the RX 7400 OEM and 2024-04-15 for the RTX 4010. Production status is active for the RTX 4010, with no status given for the AMD card. The RTX 4010 has a recorded benchmark score and percentileVsAllGpus of 18, while the RX 7400 OEM has no benchmarks and a percentileVsAllGpus of 50.

The Verdict

The data indicates the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is the stronger compute part on paper. It offers 7.885 TFLOPS FP32, more than double the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 123.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s dwarf the RTX 4010’s 42.29 GTexel/s and 28.19 GPixel/s. Memory capacity and bandwidth also favor AMD, with 8 GB and 172.8 GB/s versus 4 GB and 96.00 GB/s. For any workload that stresses raw shading throughput or large textures, the RX 7400 OEM should deliver substantially higher performance.

The RTX 4010 counters with tensor cores, which the RX 7400 OEM lacks. That gives the NVIDIA card a potential edge in AI inference or DLSS-style workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this. The RTX 4010 also has a recorded 3DMark score of 2893, placing it within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, and Quadro P600 in that test. That result suggests the RTX 4010 is surprisingly competitive in that specific benchmark, despite its low memory and compute specs. However, the RX 7400 OEM has no comparable score, so a direct verdict from measured data is impossible.

For general rasterization and memory-intensive tasks, the RX 7400 OEM appears superior based on specifications. For users requiring tensor core functionality or who prioritize the single recorded benchmark outcome, the RTX 4010 has an advantage. The RTX 4010 is also the only one with active production status, which may matter for availability. The RX 7400 OEM has a newer process node and higher transistor density, which could indicate better efficiency per transistor, but its TDP is slightly higher at 55 W versus 50 W.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rate of 7.885 TFLOPS is nearly triple the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. Texture-heavy workloads benefit from 112 TMUs and 123.2 GTexel/s, while the RTX 4010 has only 24 TMUs and 42.29 GTexel/s. The 8 GB memory capacity and 172.8 GB/s bandwidth make the RX 7400 OEM better suited for larger framebuffers or higher-resolution textures. The 128-bit bus doubles the RTX 4010’s 64-bit bus, and the 64 ROPs versus 16 ROPs gives AMD a clear lead in fill-rate-limited scenes. The RX 7400 OEM also uses a more advanced 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors, which supports its higher execution resource count.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 wins in tensor core functionality. Its 24 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for accelerated AI operations, a feature absent from the RX 7400 OEM’s specification sheet. The RTX 4010 also has a higher memory clock at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective), though the narrower bus limits overall bandwidth. Its base and boost clocks are significantly higher at 1417 MHz and 1762 MHz, which may benefit single-threaded or latency-sensitive tasks. The RTX 4010 has a recorded benchmark score of 2893, showing it can perform near the level of much higher-end cards in the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. Its 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs differ from AMD’s HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1 setup, which could matter for specific display configurations. The RTX 4010’s active production status and earlier release date of 2024-04-15 give it a market presence that the RX 7400 OEM, with no production status and a later release date, does not confirm.

In power efficiency, the two are close, with the RTX 4010 at 50 W TDP and the RX 7400 OEM at 55 W TDP. The RTX 4010 requires no power connector, while the RX 7400 OEM uses one 6-pin connector. Both list a 250 W suggested power supply. For users with limited power connector availability, the RTX 4010 holds a practical advantage. For users prioritizing compute density and memory capacity, the RX 7400 OEM is the clear choice from the recorded specifications.