AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM versus the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100. Both parts have zero average benchmark scores and no listed nearest rivals. The percentileVsAllGpus value for both is 50, indicating they sit at the median of all GPUs in the database, but this is a positional rank, not a performance measurement. Without benchmark data points, direct score comparisons cannot be made. What can be compared are the specification-derived performance ceilings. The Intel part delivers 22.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 2.82 times the 7.885 TFLOPS of the AMD card. The Intel part's texture rate is 694.4 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s for the AMD part, a 5.63 times advantage. The AMD part holds the pixel rate edge with 70.40 GPixel/s against the Intel part's 0 MPixel/s, as the Intel accelerator lacks ROPs entirely. Memory bandwidth strongly favors Intel at 1.23 TB/s versus 172.8 GB/s, a 7.12 times difference. These figures represent theoretical peaks, not measured workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM wins in every category tied to rasterization output. Its 64 ROPs deliver 70.40 GPixel/s of fill rate, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has zero ROPs and 0 MPixel/s. The AMD card also offers display outputs with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, making it the only one of the two that can drive a monitor directly. The Intel part has no display outputs. The AMD card operates at a 55 W TDP with a 250 W suggested PSU, uses a single-slot form factor, and draws power from a single 6-pin connector. The Intel accelerator uses 300 W TDP with a 700 W suggested PSU, occupies dual slots, and requires a 12-pin connector. The AMD card's RDNA 3.0 architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) with no Vulkan listing. For gaming-oriented workloads, the AMD card has the full feature set. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 wins in raw compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth. Its 22.22 TFLOPS FP32 is nearly three times the AMD figure. It carries 48 GB of HBM2e memory over an 8192 bit bus, compared to 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus. Its 7168 shading units and 448 TMUs dwarf the AMD card's 1792 shading units and 112 TMUs. The Intel part uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus PCIe 4.0 x8 on the AMD card. For data center workloads that rely on memory capacity, bandwidth, and FP32 throughput, the Intel part is the clear choice.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip on Generation 12.5 architecture. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel with 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, yielding 78.1M transistors per mm². The Intel chip has 7.52 times more transistors and a 6.27 times larger die area. The AMD part's base clock is 330 MHz with a boost of 1100 MHz, while the Intel part's base clock is 1000 MHz with a boost of 1550 MHz. Memory clocks differ substantially: the AMD card runs its GDDR6 at 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective), while the Intel HBM2e runs at 600 MHz (1200 Mbps effective) but across a much wider bus. The AMD card has 28 ray tracing cores; the Intel part has 56. Neither part lists tensor cores. The AMD part's FP16 throughput is 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio with FP32). The Intel part's FP16 throughput is 22.22 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Both support OpenGL 4.6. The AMD card was released on 2025-08-07 and has no production status listed; the Intel part was released on 2023-01-09 and has an Active production status. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV. The Intel part has no predecessor listed and lists H3C Graphics as its successor.

The Verdict

The data separates these two devices into distinct use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is the only one with display outputs, a pixel fill rate, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. Its 70.40 GPixel/s pixel rate and 64 ROPs make it suited for rendering frames to a screen. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has no ROPs, no pixel rate, and no display outputs, making it unsuitable for direct display output or traditional rasterized rendering pipelines. The Intel part's 48 GB HBM2e memory with 1.23 TB/s bandwidth and 22.22 TFLOPS FP32 positions it for memory-bound compute workloads in data center environments. Its 7168 shading units and 448 TMUs provide 5.63 times the texture throughput of the AMD card. The AMD card's 8 GB GDDR6 at 172.8 GB/s is sufficient for mainstream graphics tasks but limited for large dataset compute. The Intel part requires 300 W TDP and a 700 W suggested PSU, which is 5.45 times the AMD card's 55 W TDP and 2.8 times the suggested PSU wattage. The AMD card measures 167 mm (6.6 inches) in length versus 267 mm (10.5 inches) for the Intel part. The Intel part uses PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the lane width and moving to the newer bus generation compared to the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x8. Users needing a compact, low-power graphics card with display connectivity should select the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM. Users needing high-throughput compute with massive memory capacity should select the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 delivers 22.22 TFLOPS FP32, which is 2.82 times the 7.885 TFLOPS of the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 output video to a display?

A: No. The Intel part lists "No outputs" for display outputs, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses 48 GB of HBM2e on an 8192 bit bus with 1.23 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP and a 250 W suggested PSU. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has a 300 W TDP and a 700 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 7168 shading units and 448 TMUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 1792 shading units and 112 TMUs.

Q: What is the transistor count and process node for each?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses 13,300 million transistors on a 6 nm TSMC process. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses 100,000 million transistors on a 10 nm Intel process.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | Ponte Vecchio |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.5 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 100,000 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 1280 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 78.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1550 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) | 600 MHz (1200 Mbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 48 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 8192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 1.23 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 7168 |

| TMUs | 112 | 448 |

| ROPs | 64 | 0 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 56 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 0 MPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 694.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 22.22 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 22.22 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 300 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 700 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | Not listed |

| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2023-01-09 |

| Production Status | Not listed | Active |

| Successor | Navi IV | H3C Graphics |