AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM in raw compute performance?

A: The Arc A570M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS. The AMD part holds a 48% advantage in single-precision throughput. However, the Intel GPU reaches 10.65 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, versus 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) for AMD.

Q: Which GPU has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A570M has 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is 29.6% higher than the RX 7400 OEM's 172.8 GB/s. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but Intel runs its memory at 14 Gbps effective versus 10.8 Gbps effective for AMD.

Q: How do the thermal designs differ?

A: The RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP and requires a 250 W suggested PSU with a single 6-pin power connector. The Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and is designed as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) for portable devices.

Q: What is the transistor density comparison between these chips?

A: The AMD Navi 33 chip packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding 65.2M transistors per mm². The Intel DG2-256 chip has 11,500 million transistors on a larger 269 mm² die, resulting in 42.8M transistors per mm².

Q: Where does the Arc A570M rank among all GPUs in the database?

A: The Arc A570M sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58,392, putting the Intel part 0.3% behind.

Q: Which GPU supports newer display outputs?

A: The RX 7400 OEM provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Arc A570M's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning connectivity varies by the laptop or mobile device implementation.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM and Intel Arc A570M take fundamentally different approaches to GPU design. AMD's part uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. Intel's Arc A570M uses the Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-256 chip, belonging to the Alchemist generation under the Arc 5 Mobile series.

Both chips are fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node, but the similarities end there. The AMD chip packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel chip contains 11,500 million transistors spread across a larger 269 mm² die, with a lower density of 42.8M per mm². The density gap indicates AMD's design packs logic more tightly, while Intel's larger die accommodates a different layout.

The compute architectures diverge significantly. The RX 7400 OEM carries 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc A570M has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, but only 16 ray tracing cores. Despite having fewer total shading units, the AMD chip achieves higher FP32 throughput thanks to its architecture's raw clock efficiency and instruction scheduling.

The FP16 capabilities reveal a key architectural choice. AMD's RDNA 3.0 executes FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning both formats run at 7.885 TFLOPS. Intel's Xe-HPG executes FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling throughput to 10.65 TFLOPS. This indicates Intel optimized for workloads that can leverage reduced precision, while AMD prioritized balanced performance across precision formats.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The RX 7400 OEM has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz. The Arc A570M starts at 900 MHz base and boosts to 1300 MHz. The Intel part operates at higher frequencies throughout, though the AMD chip's architecture compensates with more efficient instruction execution per clock cycle.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Each uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The RX 7400 OEM is a single-slot discrete card measuring 167 mm (6.6 inches) in length, while the Arc A570M is an integrated graphics processor with no standalone dimensions, designed for portable devices.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark matches between the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM and the Intel Arc A570M. However, the available data for the Intel part provides meaningful context through its nearest rivals in the Geekbench OpenCL test.

The Arc A570M scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58,392. The Intel part trails by 0.3% in this comparison, a margin small enough to be considered within measurement noise. This proximity to a high-end desktop GPU from AMD's previous generation suggests the Arc A570M delivers substantial compute capability for a mobile-oriented part.

The Arc A570M also sits 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which scores 58,085. That AMD card represents a mid-range desktop offering, and the Intel mobile GPU edges it out in raw OpenCL performance. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528, placing it 0.5% ahead of the Arc A570M. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, which is 0.7% ahead.

These narrow margins indicate the Arc A570M clusters tightly with several established GPUs across vendors. The performance band from the RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 to the Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 spans only about 1%, and the Arc A570M sits near the middle of that range.

For the RX 7400 OEM, the database shows no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs. The average benchmark score is recorded as zero, which means the database lacks empirical performance measurements for this part. The percentile of 50 suggests a median position in the overall distribution, but without recorded scores, direct numerical comparisons against the Arc A570M cannot be established from the data.

The FP32 throughput figures provide the clearest computational comparison available. The RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS, which is 48% higher than the Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads, the Intel part reverses the situation with 10.65 TFLOPS versus 7.885 TFLOPS, giving it a 35% advantage. The pixel and texture rates favor Intel: the Arc A570M achieves 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s, while the RX 7400 OEM produces 70.40 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s. Intel holds a 18% lead in pixel fill rate and a 35% lead in texture fill rate.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM | Intel Arc A570M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Chip | Navi 33 | DG2-256 |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 11,500 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 269 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 42.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 112 | 128 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 16 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 166.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS | 5.325 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 75 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | None |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2023-07-31 |

| Production Status | Not specified | Active |

The memory configuration matches in size and type: both use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The bandwidth difference stems entirely from the memory clock, with Intel running at 14 Gbps effective versus AMD's 10.8 Gbps effective. Both GPUs support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is identical at PCIe 4.0 x8.

The ROP count is equal at 64 for both GPUs. The AMD part carries 28 ray tracing cores while Intel uses 16. The AMD chip has a smaller die with more transistors, while the Intel chip occupies more silicon area with fewer transistors. The Intel part operates at higher clocks across the board: 900 MHz base versus 330 MHz, and 1300 MHz boost versus 1100 MHz.

The form factors could not be more different. The RX 7400 OEM is a discrete single-slot card with a 6-pin power connector and a 250 W suggested PSU. The Arc A570M is an integrated GPU with no power connectors and no suggested PSU, designed to be soldered into portable devices. The AMD card was released on 2025-08-07, nearly two years after the Intel part's 2023-07-31 release date.

The Verdict

The data presents a split decision based on workload type. For FP32-intensive applications, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS, which is 48% higher than the Intel Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS. This advantage makes the AMD card the stronger choice for traditional gaming and general compute tasks that rely on single-precision math.

For FP16 workloads, the Intel Arc A570M reverses the comparison with 10.65 TFLOPS, a 35% advantage over the AMD part. The 2:1 FP16 ratio on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture indicates the mobile GPU handles reduced-precision computation more efficiently, which can benefit machine learning inference and certain content creation workloads.

Memory bandwidth favors Intel as well. The Arc A570M's 224.0 GB/s exceeds the RX 7400 OEM's 172.8 GB/s by 29.6%. This bandwidth advantage, combined with higher pixel and texture rates (83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s), gives Intel an edge in memory-bound and fill-rate-limited scenarios.

The Arc A570M's recorded benchmark performance confirms its competitiveness. With a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 and an 88th percentile ranking, it sits within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop GPU. The RX 7400 OEM has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making its real-world performance unverified.

Power requirements differentiate the two substantially. The RX 7400 OEM draws 55 W TDP and requires a discrete power connector with a 250 W suggested PSU. The Arc A570M draws 75 W TDP but operates as an integrated GPU with no external power requirements, making it suitable for compact portable systems where discrete card installation is impossible.

The RX 7400 OEM provides explicit display outputs through HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1, while the Arc A570M's outputs depend on the portable device implementation. This makes the AMD card the more predictable option for desktop systems with standard monitors. The AMD part also carries more ray tracing cores (28 versus 16), which may benefit ray-traced workloads despite the lower clock speeds.

For a desktop system requiring a discrete GPU with known display connectivity and higher FP32 throughput, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM presents the stronger data profile. For a mobile platform where integrated graphics are mandatory and FP16 performance matters, or where memory bandwidth is the priority, the Intel Arc A570M offers clear advantages. The choice depends on form factor requirements and the precision format dominating the intended workload.